- Title
- The dark side of emotion at work: Emotional manipulation in everyday and work place contexts
- Creator
- Hyde, Jane; Grieve, Rachel
- Date
- 2018
- Type
- Text; Journal article
- Identifier
- http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/HandleResolver/1959.17/197473
- Identifier
- vital:18878
- Identifier
-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.025
- Identifier
- ISSN:0191-8869
- Abstract
- This study investigated whether self-reported willingness to emotionally manipulate (EM) day-to-day and willingness to manipulate at work are related constructs, by analysing the factor structures and relationships of the Trait EM Willingness in General and Work Scale, as well as considering gender effects. Respondents (567 employees 365 females, 199 males, 3 other) were asked how often they engaged in various manipulative behaviours in day-to-day and work contexts. Exploratory and Confirmatory factor analyses analysed split halves of the responses. Three factors emerged: Work-Related Malicious EM Willingness, General Malicious EM Willingness, and Disingenuousness (items reflecting insincerity and deceit), demonstrating a contextual influence on malicious EM. The three-factor structure fitted the data well and was reliable, however, discriminant validity was not evident as Work-Related and General Malicious EM Willingness were highly correlated. The correlations demonstrate the trait-like consistency of malicious manipulation. The model achieved better fit for the male data, indicating the superiority of items at measuring EM in males. Endorsement of malicious EM at work was higher in males, consistent with the masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits in social role theory. These findings add to understanding of the dark side of emotion, and reveal another layer of complexity to this problematic work behaviour. •Explores nature of emotional manipulation willingness at work and in daily life.•Two types of EM Willingness were identified: malicious and disingenuousness.•Malicious EM appears to be influenced by context of workplace.•The three-factor model of EM achieved better fit for the male data.•People at work may use a variety of deceptive techniques to achieve their goals.
- Publisher
- Elsevier Ltd
- Relation
- Personality and individual differences Vol. 129, no. (2018), p. 108-113
- Rights
- All metadata describing materials held in, or linked to, the repository is freely available under a CC0 licence
- Rights
- Copyright Elsevier
- Subject
- Business & management; Circadian rhythm; Confirmatory factor analysis; Consistency (negotiation); Dark side of emotion; Discriminant validity; Dominance; Economics and business; Emotional intelligence; Emotional manipulation; Emotions; Factor structures; Femininity; Gender; Great Rift; Job performance; Manipulation; Masculinity; Psychology; psychology and cognitive sciences; Role theory; Scale (social sciences); Social psychology; Social sciences; Trait; Work (electrical); Work environment; Workplace; Workplaces; 5202 Biological psychology; 5204 Cognitive and computational psychology
- Reviewed
- Hits: 646
- Visitors: 609
- Downloads: 0