Implementation of evidence-based weekend service recommendations for allied health managers : a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol
- Sarkies, Mitchell, White, Jennifer, Morris, Meg, Taylor, Nicholas, Martin, Jennifer
- Authors: Sarkies, Mitchell , White, Jennifer , Morris, Meg , Taylor, Nicholas , Martin, Jennifer
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Implementation Science Vol. 13, no. 1 (2018), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: It is widely acknowledged that health policy and practice do not always reflect current research evidence. Whether knowledge transfer from research to practice is more successful when specific implementation approaches are used remains unclear. A model to assist engagement of allied health managers and clinicians with research implementation could involve disseminating evidence-based policy recommendations, along with the use of knowledge brokers. We developed such a model to aid decision-making for the provision of weekend allied health services. This protocol outlines the design and methods for a multi-centre cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the success of research implementation strategies to promote evidence-informed weekend allied health resource allocation decisions, especially in hospital managers. Methods: This multi-centre study will be a three-group parallel cluster randomised controlled trial. Allied health managers from Australian and New Zealand hospitals will be randomised to receive either (1) an evidence-based policy recommendation document to guide weekend allied health resource allocation decisions, (2) the same policy recommendation document with support from a knowledge broker to help implement weekend allied health policy recommendations, or (3) a usual practice control group. The primary outcome will be alignment of weekend allied health service provision with policy recommendations. This will be measured by the number of allied health service events (occasions of service) occurring on weekends as a proportion of total allied health service events for the relevant hospital wards at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Discussion: Evidence-based policy recommendation documents communicate key research findings in an accessible format. This comparatively low-cost research implementation strategy could be combined with using a knowledge broker to work collaboratively with decision-makers to promote knowledge transfer. The results will assist managers to make decisions on resource allocation, based on evidence. More generally, the findings will inform the development of an allied health model for translating research into practice. © 2018 The Author(s). **Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 5 including Federation University Australia affiliate “Jennifer Martin” is provided in this record**
- Authors: Sarkies, Mitchell , White, Jennifer , Morris, Meg , Taylor, Nicholas , Martin, Jennifer
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Implementation Science Vol. 13, no. 1 (2018), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: It is widely acknowledged that health policy and practice do not always reflect current research evidence. Whether knowledge transfer from research to practice is more successful when specific implementation approaches are used remains unclear. A model to assist engagement of allied health managers and clinicians with research implementation could involve disseminating evidence-based policy recommendations, along with the use of knowledge brokers. We developed such a model to aid decision-making for the provision of weekend allied health services. This protocol outlines the design and methods for a multi-centre cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the success of research implementation strategies to promote evidence-informed weekend allied health resource allocation decisions, especially in hospital managers. Methods: This multi-centre study will be a three-group parallel cluster randomised controlled trial. Allied health managers from Australian and New Zealand hospitals will be randomised to receive either (1) an evidence-based policy recommendation document to guide weekend allied health resource allocation decisions, (2) the same policy recommendation document with support from a knowledge broker to help implement weekend allied health policy recommendations, or (3) a usual practice control group. The primary outcome will be alignment of weekend allied health service provision with policy recommendations. This will be measured by the number of allied health service events (occasions of service) occurring on weekends as a proportion of total allied health service events for the relevant hospital wards at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Discussion: Evidence-based policy recommendation documents communicate key research findings in an accessible format. This comparatively low-cost research implementation strategy could be combined with using a knowledge broker to work collaboratively with decision-makers to promote knowledge transfer. The results will assist managers to make decisions on resource allocation, based on evidence. More generally, the findings will inform the development of an allied health model for translating research into practice. © 2018 The Author(s). **Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 5 including Federation University Australia affiliate “Jennifer Martin” is provided in this record**
What factors do allied health take into account when making resource allocation decisions?
- Lane, Haylee, Sturgess, Tamica, Philip, Kathleen, Markham, Donna, Martin, Jennifer
- Authors: Lane, Haylee , Sturgess, Tamica , Philip, Kathleen , Markham, Donna , Martin, Jennifer
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: International Journal of Health Policy and Management Vol. 7, no. 5 (2018), p. 412-420
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: Allied health comprises multiple professional groups including dietetics, medical radiation practitioners, occupational therapists, optometrists and psychologists. Different to medical and nursing, Allied health are often organized in discipline specific departments and allocate budgets within these to provide services to a range of clinical areas. Little is known of how managers of allied health go about allocating these resources, the factors they consider when making these decisions, and the sources of information they rely upon. The purpose of this study was to identify the key factors that allied health consider when making resource allocation decisions and the sources of information they are based upon. Methods: Four forums were conducted each consisting of case studies, a large group discussion and two hypothetical scenarios to elicit data. A thematic content analysis commenced during post-forum discussions of key factors by forum facilitators. These factors were then presented to an expert working party for further discussion and refinement. Transcripts were generated of all data recordings and a detailed thematic analysis was undertaken by one author to ensure coded data matched the initial thematic analysis. Results: Twelve factors affecting the decision-making of allied health managers and clinicians were identified. One of these factors was disendorsed by the expert working party. The 11 remaining factors can be considered to be key decision-making principles that should be consistently applied to resource allocation. These principles were clustered into three overarching themes of readiness, impact and appropriateness. Conclusion: Understanding these principles now means further research can be completed to more effectively integrate research evidence into health policy and service delivery, create partnerships among policy-makers, managers, service providers and researchers, and to provide support to answer difficult questions that policy-makers, managers and service providers face. © 2018 The Author(s). **Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 5 including Federation University Australia affiliate “Jennifer Martin” is provided in this record**
- Authors: Lane, Haylee , Sturgess, Tamica , Philip, Kathleen , Markham, Donna , Martin, Jennifer
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: International Journal of Health Policy and Management Vol. 7, no. 5 (2018), p. 412-420
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: Allied health comprises multiple professional groups including dietetics, medical radiation practitioners, occupational therapists, optometrists and psychologists. Different to medical and nursing, Allied health are often organized in discipline specific departments and allocate budgets within these to provide services to a range of clinical areas. Little is known of how managers of allied health go about allocating these resources, the factors they consider when making these decisions, and the sources of information they rely upon. The purpose of this study was to identify the key factors that allied health consider when making resource allocation decisions and the sources of information they are based upon. Methods: Four forums were conducted each consisting of case studies, a large group discussion and two hypothetical scenarios to elicit data. A thematic content analysis commenced during post-forum discussions of key factors by forum facilitators. These factors were then presented to an expert working party for further discussion and refinement. Transcripts were generated of all data recordings and a detailed thematic analysis was undertaken by one author to ensure coded data matched the initial thematic analysis. Results: Twelve factors affecting the decision-making of allied health managers and clinicians were identified. One of these factors was disendorsed by the expert working party. The 11 remaining factors can be considered to be key decision-making principles that should be consistently applied to resource allocation. These principles were clustered into three overarching themes of readiness, impact and appropriateness. Conclusion: Understanding these principles now means further research can be completed to more effectively integrate research evidence into health policy and service delivery, create partnerships among policy-makers, managers, service providers and researchers, and to provide support to answer difficult questions that policy-makers, managers and service providers face. © 2018 The Author(s). **Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 5 including Federation University Australia affiliate “Jennifer Martin” is provided in this record**
Effectiveness of knowledge brokering and recommendation dissemination for influencing healthcare resource allocation decisions : a cluster randomised controlled implementation trial
- Sarkies, Mitchell, Robins, Lauren, Jepson, Megan, Williams, Cylie, Martin, Jennifer
- Authors: Sarkies, Mitchell , Robins, Lauren , Jepson, Megan , Williams, Cylie , Martin, Jennifer
- Date: 2021
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: PLoS Medicine Vol. 18, no. 10 (2021), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background Implementing evidence into clinical practice is a key focus of healthcare improvements to reduce unwarranted variation. Dissemination of evidence-based recommendations and knowledge brokering have emerged as potential strategies to achieve evidence implementation by influencing resource allocation decisions. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of these two research implementation strategies to facilitate evidence-informed healthcare management decisions for the provision of inpatient weekend allied health services. Methods and findings This multicentre, single-blinded (data collection and analysis), three-group parallel cluster randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation was conducted in Australian and New Zealand hospitals between February 2018 and January 2020. Clustering and randomisation took place at the organisation level where weekend allied health staffing decisions were made (e.g., network of hospitals or single hospital). Hospital wards were nested within these decision-making structures. Three conditions were compared over a 12-month period: (1) usual practice waitlist control; (2) dissemination of written evidence-based practice recommendations; and (3) access to a webinar-based knowledge broker in addition to the recommendations. The primary outcome was the alignment of weekend allied health provision with practice recommendations at the cluster and ward levels, addressing the adoption, penetration, and fidelity to the recommendations. The secondary outcome was mean hospital length of stay at the ward level. Outcomes were collected at baseline and 12 months later. A total of 45 clusters (n = 833 wards) were randomised to either control (n = 15), recommendation (n = 16), or knowledge broker (n = 14) conditions. Four (9%) did not provide follow-up data, and no adverse events were recorded. No significant effect was found with either implementation strategy for the primary outcome at the cluster level (recommendation versus control β 18.11 [95% CI −8,721.81 to 8,758.02] p = 0.997; knowledge broker versus control β 1.24 [95% CI −6,992.60 to 6,995.07] p = 1.000; recommendation versus knowledge broker β −9.12 [95% CI −3,878.39 to 3,860.16] p = 0.996) or ward level (recommendation versus control β 0.01 [95% CI 0.74 to 0.75] p = 0.983; knowledge broker versus control β −0.12 [95% CI −0.54 to 0.30] p = 0.581; recommendation versus knowledge broker β −0.19 [−1.04 to 0.65] p = 0.651). There was no significant effect between strategies for the secondary outcome at ward level (recommendation versus control β 2.19 [95% CI −1.36 to 5.74] p = 0.219; knowledge broker versus control β −0.55 [95% CI −1.16 to 0.06] p = 0.075; recommendation versus knowledge broker β −3.75 [95% CI −8.33 to 0.82] p = 0.102). None of the control or knowledge broker clusters transitioned to partial or full alignment with the recommendations. Three (20%) of the clusters who only received the written recommendations transitioned from nonalignment to partial alignment. Limitations include underpowering at the cluster level sample due to the grouping of multiple geographically distinct hospitals to avoid contamination. Conclusions Owing to a lack of power at the cluster level, this trial was unable to identify a difference between the knowledge broker strategy and dissemination of recommendations compared with usual practice for the promotion of evidence-informed resource allocation to inpatient weekend allied health services. Future research is needed to determine the interactions between different implementation strategies and healthcare contexts when translating evidence into healthcare practice. © 2021 Sarkies et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
- Authors: Sarkies, Mitchell , Robins, Lauren , Jepson, Megan , Williams, Cylie , Martin, Jennifer
- Date: 2021
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: PLoS Medicine Vol. 18, no. 10 (2021), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background Implementing evidence into clinical practice is a key focus of healthcare improvements to reduce unwarranted variation. Dissemination of evidence-based recommendations and knowledge brokering have emerged as potential strategies to achieve evidence implementation by influencing resource allocation decisions. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of these two research implementation strategies to facilitate evidence-informed healthcare management decisions for the provision of inpatient weekend allied health services. Methods and findings This multicentre, single-blinded (data collection and analysis), three-group parallel cluster randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation was conducted in Australian and New Zealand hospitals between February 2018 and January 2020. Clustering and randomisation took place at the organisation level where weekend allied health staffing decisions were made (e.g., network of hospitals or single hospital). Hospital wards were nested within these decision-making structures. Three conditions were compared over a 12-month period: (1) usual practice waitlist control; (2) dissemination of written evidence-based practice recommendations; and (3) access to a webinar-based knowledge broker in addition to the recommendations. The primary outcome was the alignment of weekend allied health provision with practice recommendations at the cluster and ward levels, addressing the adoption, penetration, and fidelity to the recommendations. The secondary outcome was mean hospital length of stay at the ward level. Outcomes were collected at baseline and 12 months later. A total of 45 clusters (n = 833 wards) were randomised to either control (n = 15), recommendation (n = 16), or knowledge broker (n = 14) conditions. Four (9%) did not provide follow-up data, and no adverse events were recorded. No significant effect was found with either implementation strategy for the primary outcome at the cluster level (recommendation versus control β 18.11 [95% CI −8,721.81 to 8,758.02] p = 0.997; knowledge broker versus control β 1.24 [95% CI −6,992.60 to 6,995.07] p = 1.000; recommendation versus knowledge broker β −9.12 [95% CI −3,878.39 to 3,860.16] p = 0.996) or ward level (recommendation versus control β 0.01 [95% CI 0.74 to 0.75] p = 0.983; knowledge broker versus control β −0.12 [95% CI −0.54 to 0.30] p = 0.581; recommendation versus knowledge broker β −0.19 [−1.04 to 0.65] p = 0.651). There was no significant effect between strategies for the secondary outcome at ward level (recommendation versus control β 2.19 [95% CI −1.36 to 5.74] p = 0.219; knowledge broker versus control β −0.55 [95% CI −1.16 to 0.06] p = 0.075; recommendation versus knowledge broker β −3.75 [95% CI −8.33 to 0.82] p = 0.102). None of the control or knowledge broker clusters transitioned to partial or full alignment with the recommendations. Three (20%) of the clusters who only received the written recommendations transitioned from nonalignment to partial alignment. Limitations include underpowering at the cluster level sample due to the grouping of multiple geographically distinct hospitals to avoid contamination. Conclusions Owing to a lack of power at the cluster level, this trial was unable to identify a difference between the knowledge broker strategy and dissemination of recommendations compared with usual practice for the promotion of evidence-informed resource allocation to inpatient weekend allied health services. Future research is needed to determine the interactions between different implementation strategies and healthcare contexts when translating evidence into healthcare practice. © 2021 Sarkies et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
A novel counterbalanced implementation study design : methodological description and application to implementation research
- Sarkies, Mitchell, Skinner, Elizabeth, Bowles, Kelly-Ann, Morris, Meg, Martin, Jennifer
- Authors: Sarkies, Mitchell , Skinner, Elizabeth , Bowles, Kelly-Ann , Morris, Meg , Martin, Jennifer
- Date: 2019
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Implementation Science Vol. 14, no. 1 (2019), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: Implementation research is increasingly being recognised for optimising the outcomes of clinical practice. Frequently, the benefits of new evidence are not implemented due to the difficulties applying traditional research methodologies to implementation settings. Randomised controlled trials are not always practical for the implementation phase of knowledge transfer, as differences between individual and organisational readiness for change combined with small sample sizes can lead to imbalances in factors that impede or facilitate change between intervention and control groups. Within-cluster repeated measure designs could control for variance between intervention and control groups by allowing the same clusters to receive a sequence of conditions. Although in implementation settings, they can contaminate the intervention and control groups after the initial exposure to interventions. We propose the novel application of counterbalanced design to implementation research where repeated measures are employed through crossover, but contamination is averted by counterbalancing different health contexts in which to test the implementation strategy. Methods: In a counterbalanced implementation study, the implementation strategy (independent variable) has two or more levels evaluated across an equivalent number of health contexts (e.g. community-acquired pneumonia and nutrition for critically ill patients) using the same outcome (dependent variable). This design limits each cluster to one distinct strategy related to one specific context, and therefore does not overburden any cluster to more than one focussed implementation strategy for a particular outcome, and provides a ready-made control comparison, holding fixed. The different levels of the independent variable can be delivered concurrently because each level uses a different health context within each cluster to avoid the effect of treatment contamination from exposure to the intervention or control condition. Results: An example application of the counterbalanced implementation design is presented in a hypothetical study to demonstrate the comparison of 'video-based' and 'written-based' evidence summary research implementation strategies for changing clinical practice in community-acquired pneumonia and nutrition in critically ill patient health contexts. Conclusion: A counterbalanced implementation study design provides a promising model for concurrently investigating the success of research implementation strategies across multiple health context areas such as community-acquired pneumonia and nutrition for critically ill patients. © 2019 The Author(s). **Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 5 including Federation University Australia affiliate “Jennifer Martin" is provided in this record**
- Authors: Sarkies, Mitchell , Skinner, Elizabeth , Bowles, Kelly-Ann , Morris, Meg , Martin, Jennifer
- Date: 2019
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Implementation Science Vol. 14, no. 1 (2019), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: Implementation research is increasingly being recognised for optimising the outcomes of clinical practice. Frequently, the benefits of new evidence are not implemented due to the difficulties applying traditional research methodologies to implementation settings. Randomised controlled trials are not always practical for the implementation phase of knowledge transfer, as differences between individual and organisational readiness for change combined with small sample sizes can lead to imbalances in factors that impede or facilitate change between intervention and control groups. Within-cluster repeated measure designs could control for variance between intervention and control groups by allowing the same clusters to receive a sequence of conditions. Although in implementation settings, they can contaminate the intervention and control groups after the initial exposure to interventions. We propose the novel application of counterbalanced design to implementation research where repeated measures are employed through crossover, but contamination is averted by counterbalancing different health contexts in which to test the implementation strategy. Methods: In a counterbalanced implementation study, the implementation strategy (independent variable) has two or more levels evaluated across an equivalent number of health contexts (e.g. community-acquired pneumonia and nutrition for critically ill patients) using the same outcome (dependent variable). This design limits each cluster to one distinct strategy related to one specific context, and therefore does not overburden any cluster to more than one focussed implementation strategy for a particular outcome, and provides a ready-made control comparison, holding fixed. The different levels of the independent variable can be delivered concurrently because each level uses a different health context within each cluster to avoid the effect of treatment contamination from exposure to the intervention or control condition. Results: An example application of the counterbalanced implementation design is presented in a hypothetical study to demonstrate the comparison of 'video-based' and 'written-based' evidence summary research implementation strategies for changing clinical practice in community-acquired pneumonia and nutrition in critically ill patient health contexts. Conclusion: A counterbalanced implementation study design provides a promising model for concurrently investigating the success of research implementation strategies across multiple health context areas such as community-acquired pneumonia and nutrition for critically ill patients. © 2019 The Author(s). **Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 5 including Federation University Australia affiliate “Jennifer Martin" is provided in this record**
Mental health literacy and social work education
- Authors: Martin, Jennifer
- Date: 2016
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education Vol. 18, no. 1 (2016), p. 103-120
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: The aim of this article is to investigate the relevance of mental health literacy for social work education by presenting the findings of a three-stage study conducted in 2014. In Stage 1, the Youth Mental Health First Aid (YMHFA) mental health literacy course was mapped against the mental health curricula required for social work degree programs accredited by the professional body, the Australian Association of Social Workers (AASW). During Stage 2, a scoping study was undertaken to ascertain what Mental Health First Aid courses were being taught in social work and human service programs across Australia. Survey responses from bachelor and master’s social work students commenting on the newness and relevance of the YMHFA course content are presented in Stage 3. The results of this study suggest that coursework in mental health literacy is of benefit to social work students and that the YMHFA course meets a considerable amount of the AASW required content. It is concluded that studies in mental health literacy provide social work students with a strong basic foundation in mental health knowledge, values and skills.
- Authors: Martin, Jennifer
- Date: 2016
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Advances in Social Work and Welfare Education Vol. 18, no. 1 (2016), p. 103-120
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: The aim of this article is to investigate the relevance of mental health literacy for social work education by presenting the findings of a three-stage study conducted in 2014. In Stage 1, the Youth Mental Health First Aid (YMHFA) mental health literacy course was mapped against the mental health curricula required for social work degree programs accredited by the professional body, the Australian Association of Social Workers (AASW). During Stage 2, a scoping study was undertaken to ascertain what Mental Health First Aid courses were being taught in social work and human service programs across Australia. Survey responses from bachelor and master’s social work students commenting on the newness and relevance of the YMHFA course content are presented in Stage 3. The results of this study suggest that coursework in mental health literacy is of benefit to social work students and that the YMHFA course meets a considerable amount of the AASW required content. It is concluded that studies in mental health literacy provide social work students with a strong basic foundation in mental health knowledge, values and skills.
Conservation, agriculture, sustainable, development and strong communities
- Authors: Martin, Jennifer
- Date: 2020
- Type: Text , Conference paper
- Relation: Strategies for the promotion of conservation agriculture in Central Asia, Proceedings of the International Conference, Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 5–7 September 2018 p. 278-287
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Four decades have passed since the introduction of Conservation Agriculture research and development. We also mark forty years since the introduction of the Declaration of Alma-Ata at the International Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, 6–12 September 1978. Furthermore, of significance to the future development of sustainable agriculture practices and healthy communities, is the introduction of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals in January 2016. These follow on from the Millennium Development goals that will guide the United Nations Development Program policy and development unti l 2030. An Australian case study on Conservation Agriculture is presented examining the relationship between Conservation Agriculture, health and wellbeing and sustainable development. It is argued that an ecosystems approach is useful for strategic sustainable development to understand the connectedness and inter-relationship between climate change agricultural practices, sense of place, identity, health and wellbeing. Community development processes can assist to build strong communities through collaboration between farmers, farmer organizations, local experts, and national and regional public and private institutions.
- Authors: Martin, Jennifer
- Date: 2020
- Type: Text , Conference paper
- Relation: Strategies for the promotion of conservation agriculture in Central Asia, Proceedings of the International Conference, Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 5–7 September 2018 p. 278-287
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Four decades have passed since the introduction of Conservation Agriculture research and development. We also mark forty years since the introduction of the Declaration of Alma-Ata at the International Conference on Primary Health Care, Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, 6–12 September 1978. Furthermore, of significance to the future development of sustainable agriculture practices and healthy communities, is the introduction of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals in January 2016. These follow on from the Millennium Development goals that will guide the United Nations Development Program policy and development unti l 2030. An Australian case study on Conservation Agriculture is presented examining the relationship between Conservation Agriculture, health and wellbeing and sustainable development. It is argued that an ecosystems approach is useful for strategic sustainable development to understand the connectedness and inter-relationship between climate change agricultural practices, sense of place, identity, health and wellbeing. Community development processes can assist to build strong communities through collaboration between farmers, farmer organizations, local experts, and national and regional public and private institutions.
Continuing professional development for accredited mental health social workers : an evaluative study
- Martin, Jennifer, Paul, Lauren, Robertson, Melissa
- Authors: Martin, Jennifer , Paul, Lauren , Robertson, Melissa
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Advances in social work and welfare education Vol. 20, no. 2 (2018), p. 129-143
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: This article considers how the Australian Association of Social Workers (AASW) has responded to the recommendations made by accredited mental health social workers in the first national study on continuing professional development needs in 2010. The aim of the study was to ascertain the responsiveness of the AASW to the recommendations made so that members knew if their concerns had been listened to. A five-year timeframe was considered timely for such a review. An evaluative approach was used in August 2015 sourcing data from both public and private domains from 2010 to 2015 to identify, and not appraise or critique, how the AASW had responded to the recommendations in the 2010 review. This is in acknowledgment that there may be other reasons influencing changes made and that these may not be a direct response to the 2010 survey recommendations. The study found that all recommendations made in the 2010 review were responded to by the AASW. [Author abstract]
- Authors: Martin, Jennifer , Paul, Lauren , Robertson, Melissa
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Advances in social work and welfare education Vol. 20, no. 2 (2018), p. 129-143
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: This article considers how the Australian Association of Social Workers (AASW) has responded to the recommendations made by accredited mental health social workers in the first national study on continuing professional development needs in 2010. The aim of the study was to ascertain the responsiveness of the AASW to the recommendations made so that members knew if their concerns had been listened to. A five-year timeframe was considered timely for such a review. An evaluative approach was used in August 2015 sourcing data from both public and private domains from 2010 to 2015 to identify, and not appraise or critique, how the AASW had responded to the recommendations in the 2010 review. This is in acknowledgment that there may be other reasons influencing changes made and that these may not be a direct response to the 2010 survey recommendations. The study found that all recommendations made in the 2010 review were responded to by the AASW. [Author abstract]
Risky drinking social worlds in Victoria: a social media analysis
- Ahmed, Ashir, Martin, Jennifer, Towl, David, Haussegger, Zac
- Authors: Ahmed, Ashir , Martin, Jennifer , Towl, David , Haussegger, Zac
- Date: 2021
- Type: Text , Technical report , Report
- Full Text:
- Authors: Ahmed, Ashir , Martin, Jennifer , Towl, David , Haussegger, Zac
- Date: 2021
- Type: Text , Technical report , Report
- Full Text:
Suicide coverage in mainstream and social media: Challenges for media convergence
- Martin, Jennifer, Kuek, Stephanie, Jarema, Alexander, Oakham, Mandy, Maude, Phillip
- Authors: Martin, Jennifer , Kuek, Stephanie , Jarema, Alexander , Oakham, Mandy , Maude, Phillip
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: New Community Quarterly Vol. 14, no. 55 (2018), p. 73-79
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Authors: Martin, Jennifer , Kuek, Stephanie , Jarema, Alexander , Oakham, Mandy , Maude, Phillip
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: New Community Quarterly Vol. 14, no. 55 (2018), p. 73-79
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
Conversations about risky alcohol use on social media
- Martin, Jennifer, Ahmed, Ashir, Towl, David, Haussegger, Zac
- Authors: Martin, Jennifer , Ahmed, Ashir , Towl, David , Haussegger, Zac
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: New Community Quarterly Vol. 19, no. 3 (2018), p. 59-64
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Authors: Martin, Jennifer , Ahmed, Ashir , Towl, David , Haussegger, Zac
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: New Community Quarterly Vol. 19, no. 3 (2018), p. 59-64
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
Perceptions of risk in allied health resource allocation decision-making
- Grant, Kellie, White, Jennifer, Martin, Jennifer, Haintes, Terrence
- Authors: Grant, Kellie , White, Jennifer , Martin, Jennifer , Haintes, Terrence
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: New Community Quarterly Vol. 18, no. 3 (2018), p. 10-14
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Authors: Grant, Kellie , White, Jennifer , Martin, Jennifer , Haintes, Terrence
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: New Community Quarterly Vol. 18, no. 3 (2018), p. 10-14
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »