Integrating theory into disturbance interaction experiments to better inform ecosystem management
- Foster, Claire, Sato, Chloe, Lindenmayer, David, Barton, Philip
- Authors: Foster, Claire , Sato, Chloe , Lindenmayer, David , Barton, Philip
- Date: 2016
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Global Change Biology Vol. 22, no. 4 (2016), p. 1325-1335
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Managing multiple, interacting disturbances is a key challenge to biodiversity conservation, and one that will only increase as global change drivers continue to alter disturbance regimes. Theoretical studies have highlighted the importance of a mechanistic understanding of stressor interactions for improving the prediction and management of interactive effects. However, many conservation studies are not designed or interpreted in the context of theory and instead focus on case-specific management questions. This is a problem as it means that few studies test the relationships highlighted in theoretical models as being important for ecological management. We explore the extent of this problem among studies of interacting disturbances by reviewing recent experimental studies of the interaction between fire and grazing in terrestrial ecosystems. Interactions between fire and grazing can occur via a number of pathways; one disturbance can modify the other's likelihood, intensity or spatial distribution, or one disturbance can alter the other's impacts on individual organisms. The strength of such interactions will vary depending on disturbance attributes (e.g. size or intensity), and this variation is likely to be nonlinear. We show that few experiments testing fire-grazing interactions are able to identify the mechanistic pathway driving an observed interaction, and most are unable to detect nonlinear effects. We demonstrate how these limitations compromise the ability of experimental studies to effectively inform ecological management. We propose a series of adjustments to the design of disturbance interaction experiments that would enable tests of key theoretical pathways and provide the deeper ecological understanding necessary for effective management. Such considerations are relevant to studies of a broad range of ecological interactions and are critical to informing the management of disturbance regimes in the context of accelerating global change. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
- Authors: Foster, Claire , Sato, Chloe , Lindenmayer, David , Barton, Philip
- Date: 2016
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Global Change Biology Vol. 22, no. 4 (2016), p. 1325-1335
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Managing multiple, interacting disturbances is a key challenge to biodiversity conservation, and one that will only increase as global change drivers continue to alter disturbance regimes. Theoretical studies have highlighted the importance of a mechanistic understanding of stressor interactions for improving the prediction and management of interactive effects. However, many conservation studies are not designed or interpreted in the context of theory and instead focus on case-specific management questions. This is a problem as it means that few studies test the relationships highlighted in theoretical models as being important for ecological management. We explore the extent of this problem among studies of interacting disturbances by reviewing recent experimental studies of the interaction between fire and grazing in terrestrial ecosystems. Interactions between fire and grazing can occur via a number of pathways; one disturbance can modify the other's likelihood, intensity or spatial distribution, or one disturbance can alter the other's impacts on individual organisms. The strength of such interactions will vary depending on disturbance attributes (e.g. size or intensity), and this variation is likely to be nonlinear. We show that few experiments testing fire-grazing interactions are able to identify the mechanistic pathway driving an observed interaction, and most are unable to detect nonlinear effects. We demonstrate how these limitations compromise the ability of experimental studies to effectively inform ecological management. We propose a series of adjustments to the design of disturbance interaction experiments that would enable tests of key theoretical pathways and provide the deeper ecological understanding necessary for effective management. Such considerations are relevant to studies of a broad range of ecological interactions and are critical to informing the management of disturbance regimes in the context of accelerating global change. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Herbivory and fire interact to affect forest understory habitat, but not its use by small vertebrates
- Foster, Claire, Barton, Philip, Sato, C. F., Wood, J. T., Macgregor, C. I., Lindenmayer, David
- Authors: Foster, Claire , Barton, Philip , Sato, C. F. , Wood, J. T. , Macgregor, C. I. , Lindenmayer, David
- Date: 2016
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Animal Conservation Vol. 19, no. 1 (2016), p. 15-25
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Herbivory and fire are two disturbances that often co-occur, but studies of their interactive effects are rare outside of grassland ecosystems. We experimentally tested the interactive effects of prescribed fire and macropod herbivory on forest understory vegetation and its vertebrate fauna. Fire and herbivory interacted synergistically to affect forest understory vegetation, with palatable plants showing poor post-fire recovery in unfenced sites compared with herbivore exclusion sites. Despite this strong interactive effect on vegetation, small vertebrates responded to the individual, and not the interactive effects of disturbance. The native insectivorous mammal Antechinus stuartii was more frequently encountered on large herbivore exclusion sites, as was the introduced European rabbit. In contrast, the small skink Lampropholis delicata was more common on sites with high densities of large herbivores. Skinks, snakes and European rabbits were also more active on burnt than unburnt sites. Our results suggest that it may be necessary to manage the macropod herbivore population after fire to prevent the decline of palatable plants, and maintain the dense habitat required by some small mammals. However, as the invasive rabbit was most active in macropod-free sites after fire, any management must include control of both types of herbivores. A mix of understory densities may also need to be maintained to ensure the persistence of species preferring more open habitats. Our study demonstrates that interactive effects of disturbance on vegetation communities may not lead to predictable effects on animals, and highlights the importance of considering both multiple stressors, and multiple species, in the management of disturbance regimes. © 2016 The Zoological Society of London.
- Authors: Foster, Claire , Barton, Philip , Sato, C. F. , Wood, J. T. , Macgregor, C. I. , Lindenmayer, David
- Date: 2016
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Animal Conservation Vol. 19, no. 1 (2016), p. 15-25
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Herbivory and fire are two disturbances that often co-occur, but studies of their interactive effects are rare outside of grassland ecosystems. We experimentally tested the interactive effects of prescribed fire and macropod herbivory on forest understory vegetation and its vertebrate fauna. Fire and herbivory interacted synergistically to affect forest understory vegetation, with palatable plants showing poor post-fire recovery in unfenced sites compared with herbivore exclusion sites. Despite this strong interactive effect on vegetation, small vertebrates responded to the individual, and not the interactive effects of disturbance. The native insectivorous mammal Antechinus stuartii was more frequently encountered on large herbivore exclusion sites, as was the introduced European rabbit. In contrast, the small skink Lampropholis delicata was more common on sites with high densities of large herbivores. Skinks, snakes and European rabbits were also more active on burnt than unburnt sites. Our results suggest that it may be necessary to manage the macropod herbivore population after fire to prevent the decline of palatable plants, and maintain the dense habitat required by some small mammals. However, as the invasive rabbit was most active in macropod-free sites after fire, any management must include control of both types of herbivores. A mix of understory densities may also need to be maintained to ensure the persistence of species preferring more open habitats. Our study demonstrates that interactive effects of disturbance on vegetation communities may not lead to predictable effects on animals, and highlights the importance of considering both multiple stressors, and multiple species, in the management of disturbance regimes. © 2016 The Zoological Society of London.
Managing consequences of climate-driven species redistribution requires integration of ecology, conservation and social science
- Bonebrake, Timothy, Brown, Christopher, Bell, Johann, Blanchard, Julia, Chauvenet, Alienor, Champion, Curtis, Chen, I-Ching, Clark, Timothy, Colwell, Robert, Danielsen, Finn, Dell, Anthony, Donelson, Jennifer, Evengård, Birgitta, Ferrier, Simon, Frusher, Stewart, Garcia, Raquel, Griffis, Roger, Hobday, Alistair, Jarzyna, Marta, Lee, Emma, Lenoir, Jonathan, Linnetved, Hlif, Martin, Victoria, McCormack, Phillipa, McDonald, Jan, McDonald-Madden, Eve, Mitchell, Nicola, Mustonen, Tero, Pandolfi, John, Pettorelli, Nathalie
- Authors: Bonebrake, Timothy , Brown, Christopher , Bell, Johann , Blanchard, Julia , Chauvenet, Alienor , Champion, Curtis , Chen, I-Ching , Clark, Timothy , Colwell, Robert , Danielsen, Finn , Dell, Anthony , Donelson, Jennifer , Evengård, Birgitta , Ferrier, Simon , Frusher, Stewart , Garcia, Raquel , Griffis, Roger , Hobday, Alistair , Jarzyna, Marta , Lee, Emma , Lenoir, Jonathan , Linnetved, Hlif , Martin, Victoria , McCormack, Phillipa , McDonald, Jan , McDonald-Madden, Eve , Mitchell, Nicola , Mustonen, Tero , Pandolfi, John , Pettorelli, Nathalie
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Biological Reviews Vol. 93, no. 1 (2018), p. 284-305
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Climate change is driving a pervasive global redistribution of the planet's species. Species redistribution poses new questions for the study of ecosystems, conservation science and human societies that require a coordinated and integrated approach. Here we review recent progress, key gaps and strategic directions in this nascent research area, emphasising emerging themes in species redistribution biology, the importance of understanding underlying drivers and the need to anticipate novel outcomes of changes in species ranges. We highlight that species redistribution has manifest implications across multiple temporal and spatial scales and from genes to ecosystems. Understanding range shifts from ecological, physiological, genetic and biogeographical perspectives is essential for informing changing paradigms in conservation science and for designing conservation strategies that incorporate changing population connectivity and advance adaptation to climate change. Species redistributions present challenges for human well-being, environmental management and sustainable development. By synthesising recent approaches, theories and tools, our review establishes an interdisciplinary foundation for the development of future research on species redistribution. Specifically, we demonstrate how ecological, conservation and social research on species redistribution can best be achieved by working across disciplinary boundaries to develop and implement solutions to climate change challenges. Future studies should therefore integrate existing and complementary scientific frameworks while incorporating social science and human-centred approaches. Finally, we emphasise that the best science will not be useful unless more scientists engage with managers, policy makers and the public to develop responsible and socially acceptable options for the global challenges arising from species redistributions. © 2017 Cambridge Philosophical Society **Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 30 including the now Federation University Australia affiliate “Emma Lee” is provided in this record**
- Authors: Bonebrake, Timothy , Brown, Christopher , Bell, Johann , Blanchard, Julia , Chauvenet, Alienor , Champion, Curtis , Chen, I-Ching , Clark, Timothy , Colwell, Robert , Danielsen, Finn , Dell, Anthony , Donelson, Jennifer , Evengård, Birgitta , Ferrier, Simon , Frusher, Stewart , Garcia, Raquel , Griffis, Roger , Hobday, Alistair , Jarzyna, Marta , Lee, Emma , Lenoir, Jonathan , Linnetved, Hlif , Martin, Victoria , McCormack, Phillipa , McDonald, Jan , McDonald-Madden, Eve , Mitchell, Nicola , Mustonen, Tero , Pandolfi, John , Pettorelli, Nathalie
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Biological Reviews Vol. 93, no. 1 (2018), p. 284-305
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Climate change is driving a pervasive global redistribution of the planet's species. Species redistribution poses new questions for the study of ecosystems, conservation science and human societies that require a coordinated and integrated approach. Here we review recent progress, key gaps and strategic directions in this nascent research area, emphasising emerging themes in species redistribution biology, the importance of understanding underlying drivers and the need to anticipate novel outcomes of changes in species ranges. We highlight that species redistribution has manifest implications across multiple temporal and spatial scales and from genes to ecosystems. Understanding range shifts from ecological, physiological, genetic and biogeographical perspectives is essential for informing changing paradigms in conservation science and for designing conservation strategies that incorporate changing population connectivity and advance adaptation to climate change. Species redistributions present challenges for human well-being, environmental management and sustainable development. By synthesising recent approaches, theories and tools, our review establishes an interdisciplinary foundation for the development of future research on species redistribution. Specifically, we demonstrate how ecological, conservation and social research on species redistribution can best be achieved by working across disciplinary boundaries to develop and implement solutions to climate change challenges. Future studies should therefore integrate existing and complementary scientific frameworks while incorporating social science and human-centred approaches. Finally, we emphasise that the best science will not be useful unless more scientists engage with managers, policy makers and the public to develop responsible and socially acceptable options for the global challenges arising from species redistributions. © 2017 Cambridge Philosophical Society **Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 30 including the now Federation University Australia affiliate “Emma Lee” is provided in this record**
Incorporating regional-scale ecological knowledge to improve the effectiveness of large-scale conservation programmes
- Kay, G., Barton, Philip, Driscoll, D., Cunningham, S., Blanchard, Wade
- Authors: Kay, G. , Barton, Philip , Driscoll, D. , Cunningham, S. , Blanchard, Wade
- Date: 2016
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Animal Conservation Vol. 19, no. 6 (2016), p. 515-525
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Land-stewardship programmes are a major focus of investment by governments for conserving biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. These programmes are generally large-scale (e.g. >1000 km) spanning multiple biogeographic regions but developed using spatially limited (e.g. landscape-scale; <100 km) ecological data interpolated across broad areas for one, or a few, well-studied taxonomic groups. Information about how less-studied taxa respond to regional differences in management and environmental effects has potential to further inform land-stewardship conservation programmes, but suitable data sets are rarely available. In this study, we sought to enhance planning of large-scale conservation programmes by quantifying relationships between reptile assemblages and key environmental attributes at regional scales within a large-scale (>172 000 km2) Australian land-stewardship programme. Using 234 remnant woodland monitoring sites spanning four distinct biogeographic regions, we asked: Do reptile assemblages show different environmental associations across biogeographically distinct regions? We found that environmental features important to reptile diversity differed over each region. Abundance and rare species richness of reptiles responded at regional-scales to elevation, native groundcover and aspect. We identified four implications from our study: (1) large-scale conservation schemes can achieve better outcomes for reptiles using regional-scale knowledge of environmental associations; (2) regional-scale knowledge is particularly valuable for conservation of rare reptile taxa; (3) consideration of abiotic environmental features which cannot be directly managed (e.g. aspect, elevation) is important; (4) programmes can be tailored to better support reptile groups at higher conservation risk. Our study shows that reptile-environment associations differ among biogeographic regions, and this presents opportunity for tailoring stronger policy and management strategies for conserving large-scale agricultural landscapes globally. © 2016 The Zoological Society of London. **Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 5 including Federation University Australia affiliate “Philip Barton” is provided in this record**
- Authors: Kay, G. , Barton, Philip , Driscoll, D. , Cunningham, S. , Blanchard, Wade
- Date: 2016
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Animal Conservation Vol. 19, no. 6 (2016), p. 515-525
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Land-stewardship programmes are a major focus of investment by governments for conserving biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. These programmes are generally large-scale (e.g. >1000 km) spanning multiple biogeographic regions but developed using spatially limited (e.g. landscape-scale; <100 km) ecological data interpolated across broad areas for one, or a few, well-studied taxonomic groups. Information about how less-studied taxa respond to regional differences in management and environmental effects has potential to further inform land-stewardship conservation programmes, but suitable data sets are rarely available. In this study, we sought to enhance planning of large-scale conservation programmes by quantifying relationships between reptile assemblages and key environmental attributes at regional scales within a large-scale (>172 000 km2) Australian land-stewardship programme. Using 234 remnant woodland monitoring sites spanning four distinct biogeographic regions, we asked: Do reptile assemblages show different environmental associations across biogeographically distinct regions? We found that environmental features important to reptile diversity differed over each region. Abundance and rare species richness of reptiles responded at regional-scales to elevation, native groundcover and aspect. We identified four implications from our study: (1) large-scale conservation schemes can achieve better outcomes for reptiles using regional-scale knowledge of environmental associations; (2) regional-scale knowledge is particularly valuable for conservation of rare reptile taxa; (3) consideration of abiotic environmental features which cannot be directly managed (e.g. aspect, elevation) is important; (4) programmes can be tailored to better support reptile groups at higher conservation risk. Our study shows that reptile-environment associations differ among biogeographic regions, and this presents opportunity for tailoring stronger policy and management strategies for conserving large-scale agricultural landscapes globally. © 2016 The Zoological Society of London. **Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 5 including Federation University Australia affiliate “Philip Barton” is provided in this record**
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »