Tendinopathy : Is imaging telling us the entire story?
- Authors: Docking, Sean , Ooi, Chin , Connell, David
- Date: 2015
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Vol. 45, no. 11 (2015), p. 842-852
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Tendinopathy is frequently associated with structural disorganization within the tendon. As such, the clinical use of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for tendinopathy has been the focus of numerous academic studies and clinical discussions. However, similar to other musculoskeletal conditions (osteoarthritis and intervertebral disc degeneration), there is no direct link between tendon structural disorganization and clinical symptoms, with findings on imaging potentially creating a confusing clinical picture. While imaging shows the presence and extent of structural changes within the tendon, the clinical interpretation of the images requires context in regard to the features of pain and the aggravating loads. This review will critically evaluate studies that have investigated the accuracy and sensitivity of imaging in the detection of clinical tendinopathy and the methodological issues associated with these studies (subject selection, lack of a robust gold standard, reliance on subjective measures). The advent of new imaging modalities allowing for the quantification of tendon structure or mechanical properties has allowed new critical insight into tendon pathology. A strength of these novel modalities is the ability to quantify properties of the tendon. Research utilizing ultrasound tissue characterization and sonoelastography will be discussed. This narrative review will also attempt to synthesize current research on whether imaging can predict the onset of pain or clinical outcome, the role of monitoring tendon structure during rehabilitation (ie, does tendon structure need to improve to get a positive clinical outcome?), and future directions for research, and to propose the clinical role of imaging in tendinopathy.
Does type 1 diabetes mellitus affect Achilles tendon response to a 10 km run? A case control study
- Authors: Wong, Andrea , Docking, Sean , Cook, Jill , Gaida, Jamie
- Date: 2015
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Bmc Musculoskeletal Disorders Vol. 16, no. (2015), p. 1-7
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: Achilles tendon structure deteriorates 2-days after maximal loading in elite athletes. The load-response behaviour of tendons may be altered in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) as hyperglycaemia accelerates collagen cross-linking. This study compared Achilles tendon load-response in participants with T1DM and controls. Methods: Achilles tendon structure was quantified at day-0, day-2 and day-4 after a 10 km run. Ultrasound tissue characterisation (UTC) measures tendon structural integrity by classifying pixels as echo-type I, II, III or IV. Echo-type I has the most aligned collagen fibrils and IV has the least. Results: Participants were 7 individuals with T1DM and 10 controls. All regularly ran distances greater than 5 km and VISA-A scores indicated good tendon function (T1DM = 94 +/- 11, control = 94 +/- 10). There were no diabetic complications and HbA1c was 8.7 +/- 2.6 mmol/mol for T1DM and 5.3 +/- 0.4 mmol/mol for control groups. Baseline tendon structure was similar in T1DM and control groups -UTC echo-types (I-IV) and anterior-posterior thickness were all p > 0.05. No response to load was seen in either T1DM or control group over the 4-days post exercise. Conclusion: Active individuals with T1DM do not have a heightened Achilles tendon response to load, which suggests no increased risk of tendon injury. We cannot extrapolate these findings to sedentary individuals with T1DM.
Pain mapping of the anterior knee: Injured athletes know best
- Authors: Rio, Ebonie , Girdwood, Michael , Thomas, Jake , Garofalo, Christopher , Fortington, Lauren , Docking, Sean
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Scandinavian Journal of Pain Vol. 18, no. 3 (2018), p. 409-416
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Research investigating differences in pain location and distribution across conditions is lacking. Mapping a patient's pain may be a useful way of understanding differences in presentations, however the use of pain mapping during a pain provocation task has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of patient and clinician rated pain maps during a pain provocation task for the anterior knee. Participants were recruited from a larger study of professional Australian rules football players (n=17). Players were invited to participate if they reported a current or past history of patellar tendon pain. No clinical diagnosis was performed for this reliability study. Participants were asked to point on their own knee where they usually experienced pain, which was recorded by a clinician on a piloted photograph of the knee using an iPad. Participants then completed a single leg decline squat (SLDS), after which participants indicated where they experienced pain during the task with their finger, which was recorded by a clinician. Participants then recorded their own self-rated pain map. This process was repeated 10 min later. Pain maps were subjectively classified into categories of pain location and spread by two raters. Pain area was quantified by the number of pixels shaded. Intra- and inter-rater reliability (between participants and clinicians) were analysed for pain area, similarity of location as well as subjective classification. Test-retest reliability was good for participants (intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC]=0.81) but only fair for clinicians (ICC=0.47) for pain area. There was poor agreement between participants and clinicians for pain area (ICC=0.16) and similarity of location (Jaccard index=0.19). Clinicians had good inter- and intra-rater reliability of classification of pain spread (k=0.75 and 0.67). Participant completed pain maps were more reliable than clinician pain maps. Clinicians were reliable at classifying pain based on location and type of spread. Clinicians should ask patients to complete their own pain maps following a pain provocation test, to elicit the most reliable and consistent understanding of their pain perception. © 2018 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.