The catastrophic misinterpretation model of panic disorder
- Authors: Austin, David , Richards, Jeffrey
- Date: 2001
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Behaviour Research and Therapy Vol. 39, no. 11 (2001), p. 1277-1291
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: In the catastrophic misinterpretation model of panic ark [Behav. Res. Ther. 24(1986)1461] proposes that panic attacks result from the misinterpretation of autonomic arousal stimuli as precursors to a physical or psychological emergency. The model has been widely examined, with many researchers suggesting that this specific cognitive bias is implicated in both the phenomenon of panic, and the aetiology and maintenance of panic disorder. Various research methodologies have provided only partial or inconclusive support for the model as being uniquely associated with panic, and as a cognitive process underpinning the experience of panic. This paper reviews the body of existing evidence and its implications for the model and proposes future research directions. The influence of implicit operational definitions of key terms in the catastrophic misinterpretation literature (e.g. 'catastrophe', 'threat', 'anxiety-related') are examined, and clarifications proposed. Inconsistencies and limitations in the measurement of catastrophic misinterpretation are highlighted, and subsequently developments to measurement instruments are proposed. © 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Modification of the body sensations interpretation questionnaire (BSIQ-M) : Validity and reliability
- Authors: Austin, David , Richards, Jeffrey , Klein, Britt
- Date: 2006
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Journal of Anxiety Disorders Vol. 20, no. 2 (2006), p. 237-251
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: The catastrophic misinterpretation model [Behav. Res. Ther. 24 (1986) 461-470] proposes that panic attacks result from misinterpretation of interoceptive stimuli as precursors to physical or psychological emergency. Inconclusive evidence for the model may be partly explained by limitations of the questionnaires developed to measure catastrophic misinterpretation. For example, the Body Sensations Interpretation Questionnaire (BSIQ) is unable to clarify whether anxiety-related interpretations of ambiguous interoceptive stimuli represent catastrophic misinterpretations or responses masking feared outcomes (e.g., heart failure). Additionally, it lacks items relating to several DSM-IV criteria for panic, thereby limiting content validity. Reliability is also potentially compromised due to experimenter-coding of participant-generated responses. A modified form of the BSIQ was developed to address these limitations and evaluated with non-anxious controls (n=34) and people with panic disorder (n=38). The revised questionnaire demonstrated good to excellent internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and construct validity and is a useful development of the BSIQ.