An analysis of nursing students’ decision-making in teams during simulations of acute patient deterioration
- Authors: Bucknall, Tracey , Forbes, Helen , Phillips, Nicole , Hewitt, Nicky , Cooper, Simon J. , Bogossian, Fiona , FIRST2ACT Investigators
- Date: 2016
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Journal of Advanced Nursing Vol. 72, no. 10 (2016), p. 2482-2494
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the decision-making of nursing students during team based simulations on patient deterioration to determine the sources of information, the types of decisions made and the influences underpinning their decisions. Background: Missed, misinterpreted or mismanaged physiological signs of deterioration in hospitalized patients lead to costly serious adverse events. Not surprisingly, an increased focus on clinical education and graduate nurse work readiness has resulted. Design: A descriptive exploratory design. Methods: Clinical simulation laboratories in three Australian universities were used to run team based simulations with a patient actor. A convenience sample of 97 final-year nursing students completed simulations, with three students forming a team. Four teams from each university were randomly selected for detailed analysis. Cued recall during video review of team based simulation exercises to elicit descriptions of individual and team based decision-making and reflections on performance were audio-recorded post simulation (2012) and transcribed. Results: Students recalled 11 types of decisions, including: information seeking; patient assessment; diagnostic; intervention/treatment; evaluation; escalation; prediction; planning; collaboration; communication and reflective. Patient distress, uncertainty and a lack of knowledge were frequently recalled influences on decisions. Conclusions: Incomplete information, premature diagnosis and a failure to consider alternatives when caring for patients is likely to lead to poor quality decisions. All health professionals have a responsibility in recognizing and responding to clinical deterioration within their scope of practice. A typology of nursing students’ decision-making in teams, in this context, highlights the importance of individual knowledge, leadership and communication. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Leadership and teamwork in medical emergencies: Performance of nursing students and registered nurses in simulated patient scenarios
- Authors: Endacott, Ruth , Bogossian, Fiona , Cooper, Simon J. , Forbes, Helen , Kain, Victoria , Young, Susan , Porter, Joanne , First2Act Team
- Date: 2015
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Journal of Clinical Nursing Vol. 24, no. 1-2 (2015), p. 90-100
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Aims and objectivesTo examine nursing students' and registered nurses' teamwork skills whilst managing simulated deteriorating patients.Background Studies continue to show the lack of timely recognition of patient deterioration. Management of deteriorating patients can be influenced by education and experience.DesignMixed methods study conducted in two universities and a rural hospital in Victoria, and one university in Queensland, Australia.Methods Three simulation scenarios (chest pain, hypovolaemic shock and respiratory distress) were completed in teams of three by 97 nursing students and 44 registered nurses, equating to a total of 32 student and 15 registered nurse teams. Data were obtained from (1) Objective Structured Clinical Examination rating to assess performance; (2) Team Emergency Assessment Measure scores to assess teamwork; (3) simulation video footage; (4) reflective interview during participants' review of video footage. Qualitative thematic analysis of video and interview data was undertaken.ResultsObjective structured clinical examination performance was similar across registered nurses and students (mean 54% and 49%); however, Team Emergency Assessment Measure scores differed significantly between the two groups (57% vs 38%, t = 6·841, p < 0·01). In both groups, there was a correlation between technical (Objective Structured Clinical Examination) and nontechnical (Team Emergency Assessment Measure) scores for the respiratory distress scenario (student teams: r = 0·530, p = 0·004, registered nurse teams r = 0·903, p < 0·01) and hypovolaemia scenario (student teams: r = 0·534, p = 0·02, registered nurse teams: r = 0·535, p = 0·049). Themes generated from the analysis of the combined quantitative and qualitative data were as follows: (1) leadership and followership behaviours; (2) help-seeking behaviours; (3) reliance on previous experience; (4) fixation on a single detail; and (5) team support.Conclusions There is scope to improve leadership, team work and task management skills for registered nurses and nursing students. Simulation appears to be beneficial in enabling less experienced staff to assess their teamwork skills.Relevance to clinical practiceThere is a need to encourage less experienced staff to become leaders and for all staff to develop improved teamwork skills for medical emergencies.