Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for hip arthroscopic surgery
- Kemp, Joanne, Collins, Natalie, Roos, Ewa, Crossley, Kay
- Authors: Kemp, Joanne , Collins, Natalie , Roos, Ewa , Crossley, Kay
- Date: 2013
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: American Journal of Sports Medicine Vol. 41, no. 9 (2013), p. 2065-2073
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are considered the gold standard when evaluating outcomes in a surgical population. While the psychometric properties of some PROs have been tested, the properties of newer PROs in patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery remain somewhat unknown. Purpose: To evaluate the reliability, validity, responsiveness, and interpretability of 5 PROs (Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score [HAGOS], Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [HOOS], Hip Outcome Score [HOS], International Hip Outcome Tool [iHOT-33], and Modified Harris Hip Score [MHHS]) in a population undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery and also to provide a recommendation of the best PROs in patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery. Study Design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Study participants were adults (mean age, 37 ± 11 years) who had undergone hip arthroscopic surgery 12 to 24 months previously and pain-free, healthy age-matched controls (mean age, 35 ± 11 years). Baseline characteristics including age, height, weight, waist girth, physical activity, and occupation were collected for both groups. The hip arthroscopic surgery group completed the 5 PRO questionnaires on 3 occasions, while the healthy control group completed the PRO questionnaires on 1 occasion. The reliability (test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient, or ICC] and minimal detectable change [MDC]), validity (construct validity, ability to detect a difference between groups, acceptability including floor and ceiling effects), responsiveness, and interpretability (minimal important change [MIC]) of each measure were calculated. Results: The test-retest reliability of PROs was excellent (ICC, 0.91-0.97), with an MDC of<20%. The HOOS, HAGOS, and iHOT- 33 had acceptable content validity. All PROs demonstrated construct validity and were able to detect a difference between the hip arthroscopic surgery and control groups. No measures demonstrated a floor effect; however, the MHHS and subscales relating to activities of daily living of the HOOS, HOS, and HAGOS demonstrated a ceiling effect. The HOOS, iHOT-33, and MHHS demonstrated adequate responsiveness, and the MIC for all measures was<11 points of a possible 100 points. Conclusion: The PROs of the HOOS and iHOT-33 demonstrate psychometric properties that may enable researchers and clinicians to use them with confidence in a population undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery. The psychometric properties of the MHHS, HOS, and some subscales of the HAGOS are reduced, and these PROs may be less valuable in this group. © 2013 The Author(s). National Health and Medical Research Council (Australia) Health Professional Research Training (Postdoctoral) Fellowship (No. 628918).
- Kemp, Joanne, Makdissi, Michael, Schache, Anthony, Finch, Caroline, Pritchard, Michael, Crossley, Kay
- Authors: Kemp, Joanne , Makdissi, Michael , Schache, Anthony , Finch, Caroline , Pritchard, Michael , Crossley, Kay
- Date: 2016
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy Vol. 24, no. 12 (2016), p. 3955-3961
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: If physical impairments that are associated with poorer outcomes can be identified in people with chondrolabral hip pathology, then rehabilitation programmes that target such modifiable impairments could potentially be established to improve quality of life. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between quality-of-life PROs and physical impairment measurements in people with chondrolabral pathology post-hip arthroscopic surgery. This was a cross-sectional study where multiple stepwise linear regression analyses were conducted to determine which physical impairment measurements were most associated with poorer quality-of-life patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Eighty-four patients (42 women; all aged 36 +/- 10 years) with hip chondrolabral pathology 12- to 24-month post-hip arthroscopy were included. The Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Quality-of-life (HOOS-Q) subscale and International Hip Outcome Tool (IHOT-33) PROs were collected. Measurements of active hip ROM and strength were assessed. Modifiable post-surgical physical impairments were associated with PRO in patients with chondrolabral pathology. Greater hip flexion ROM was independently associated with better scores in both HOOS-Q and IHOT-33 (adjusted r (2) values ranged from 0.249 to 0.341). Greater hip adduction strength was independently associated with better HOOS-Q and IHOT-33 (adjusted r (2) 0.227-0.317). Receiver Operator Curve analyses determined that the limit value for hip flexion ROM was 100A degrees (sensitivity 92 %, specificity 75 %), and hip adduction strength was 0.86 Nm/kg (sensitivity 96 %, specificity 70 %). Hip flexion ROM and adduction strength were associated with better quality-of-life PRO scores in patients with chondrolabral pathology 12- to 24-month post-hip arthroscopy. These impairments could be targeted by clinicians designing rehabilitation programmes to this patient group.
Infographic consensus recommendations on the classification, definition and diagnostic criteria of hip-related pain in young and middle-aged active adults from the International Hip-related Pain Research Network, Zurich 2018
- Reiman, Michael, Agricola, Rintje, Kemp, Joanne, Heerey, Joshua, Weir, Adam, Van Klij, Pim, Kassarjian, Ara, Mosler, Andrea, Ageberg, Eva, Hölmich, Perj, WArholm, Kristian, Griffin, Damian, Mayes, Suec, Khan, Karim, Crossley, Kay, Bizzini, Mario, Bloom, Nancy, Casartelli, Nicola, Diamond, Laura, Di Stasi, Stephanieu, Drew, Michael, Friedman, Daniel, Freke, Matthew, Glyn-Jones, Sionz, Gojanovic, Borisaa, Harris-Hayes, Marcie, Hunt, Michael, Impellizzeri, Franco, Ishøi, Lasseae;, Jones, Denise
- Authors: Reiman, Michael , Agricola, Rintje , Kemp, Joanne , Heerey, Joshua , Weir, Adam , Van Klij, Pim , Kassarjian, Ara , Mosler, Andrea , Ageberg, Eva , Hölmich, Perj , WArholm, Kristian , Griffin, Damian , Mayes, Suec , Khan, Karim , Crossley, Kay , Bizzini, Mario , Bloom, Nancy , Casartelli, Nicola , Diamond, Laura , Di Stasi, Stephanieu , Drew, Michael , Friedman, Daniel , Freke, Matthew , Glyn-Jones, Sionz , Gojanovic, Borisaa , Harris-Hayes, Marcie , Hunt, Michael , Impellizzeri, Franco , Ishøi, Lasseae; , Jones, Denise
- Date: 2021
- Type: Text , Journal article , Review
- Relation: British Journal of Sports Medicine Vol. 55, no. 2 (2021), p. 115-117
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: **Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 30 including Federation University Australia affiliate “Michael Drew" is provided in this record**
- Authors: Reiman, Michael , Agricola, Rintje , Kemp, Joanne , Heerey, Joshua , Weir, Adam , Van Klij, Pim , Kassarjian, Ara , Mosler, Andrea , Ageberg, Eva , Hölmich, Perj , WArholm, Kristian , Griffin, Damian , Mayes, Suec , Khan, Karim , Crossley, Kay , Bizzini, Mario , Bloom, Nancy , Casartelli, Nicola , Diamond, Laura , Di Stasi, Stephanieu , Drew, Michael , Friedman, Daniel , Freke, Matthew , Glyn-Jones, Sionz , Gojanovic, Borisaa , Harris-Hayes, Marcie , Hunt, Michael , Impellizzeri, Franco , Ishøi, Lasseae; , Jones, Denise
- Date: 2021
- Type: Text , Journal article , Review
- Relation: British Journal of Sports Medicine Vol. 55, no. 2 (2021), p. 115-117
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: **Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 30 including Federation University Australia affiliate “Michael Drew" is provided in this record**
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »