Environmental benefits inferred from impact of reforestation of deforested creek bank on soil conditioning : A case study in Victoria, Australia
- Authors: Rasiah, Velu , Florentine, Singarayer , Dahlhaus, Peter
- Date: 2015
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Agroforestry Systems Vol. 89, no. 2 (2015), p. 345-355
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Information regarding changes in soil condition after reforestation may help in inferring environmental and ecosystem benefits. A case study was undertaken in Victoria State, Australia, to investigate the changes in soil condition after reforestation of a deforested creek bank to infer environmental benefits. The study was conducted at four sites in a large farm. At each site a ~150 mstrip of land that ran perpendicular to a creek from the bank to cropping area was selected. The results show that total organic carbon (TOC) and total mineral nitrogen (TN) in the cropped segment (CS) of a strip at a given site were significantly higher than in the corresponding reforested segment (RS) which in turn was higher than in the bare segment (BS) whilst the electrical conductivity (EC) and bulk density (BD) were in the order BS > RS > CS. Six years after reforestation, TOC and TN in the RS increased by 30 and 24 %, respectively, compared with 9 and 8 % for 3 years. The EC, BD, and pH decreased by 26, 14, 14 %, respectively, 6 years after reforestation. Creek bank reforestation associated improvements in TOC, TN, BD, EC, and pH may have positive impact on pollutant and salinity abatement. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014.
Characterizing selected soil attributes of different land-use management to assess reforestation benefits of deforested riparian buffers
- Authors: Rasiah, Velu , Florentine, Singarayer
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Ecological Processes Vol. 7, no. 1 (2018), p. 1-12
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Introduction: The information available on the sensitivity of soil biotic and abiotic attributes, which can be used to track the impact of reforestation in riparian buffers, is often insufficient to refine management practices and convince stakeholders of the benefits of reforestation. Methods: In this study, conducted in Victoria, Australia, the changes in soil biotic and abiotic attributes, organic carbon (OC), mineral nitrogen (MN), total dissolved solutes (TDS) and pH were characterised to assess the impact of land-use change from bare riparian (BR) to reforested riparian (RR). Additionally, the benefits of revegetating a deforested creek bank with regard to salinity abatement and C-sequestration potentials were assessed. Results: The TDS depletion in the RR strips varied spatiotemporally from 65 to 169 mg/L, the net OC deposition from 16 to 19 g C/kg soil and MN deposition from 1.2 to 2.1 g N/kg soil, respectively. Additionally, the net changes in pH from alkaline to near neutral condition varied by 0.4 to 1.0 pH units. Approximately 30% to 60% of the net OC depletion after deforestation was redeposited under RR over 3 to 6 years. The TDS depletion after land-use changed from BR to RR ranged from 15 to 32% over 3 to 6 years. Conclusion: The soil attributes OC, MN and TDS characteristics under different land-use practices varied spatiotemporally. This information may be useful to convince stakeholders to undertake reforestation of creek banks for salinity abatement, and that change in land-use has the potential to increase C sequestration at a farm scale.