A brief guide to multi-objective reinforcement learning and planning JAAMAS track
- Hayes, Conor, Bargiacchi, Eugenio, Källström, Johan, Macfarlane, Matthew, Reymond, Mathieu, Verstraeten, Timothy, Zintgraf, Luisa, Dazeley, Richard, Heintz, Frederik, Howley, Enda, Irissappane, Aathirai, Mannion, Patrick, Nowé, Ann, Ramos, Gabriel, Restelli, Marcello, Vamplew, Peter, Roijers, Diederik
- Authors: Hayes, Conor , Bargiacchi, Eugenio , Källström, Johan , Macfarlane, Matthew , Reymond, Mathieu , Verstraeten, Timothy , Zintgraf, Luisa , Dazeley, Richard , Heintz, Frederik , Howley, Enda , Irissappane, Aathirai , Mannion, Patrick , Nowé, Ann , Ramos, Gabriel , Restelli, Marcello , Vamplew, Peter , Roijers, Diederik
- Date: 2023
- Type: Text , Conference paper
- Relation: 22nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2023, London, 29 May to 2 June 2023, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS Vol. 2023-May, p. 1988-1990
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Real-world sequential decision-making tasks are usually complex, and require trade-offs between multiple - often conflicting - objectives. However, the majority of research in reinforcement learning (RL) and decision-theoretic planning assumes a single objective, or that multiple objectives can be handled via a predefined weighted sum over the objectives. Such approaches may oversimplify the underlying problem, and produce suboptimal results. This extended abstract outlines the limitations of using a semi-blind iterative process to solve multi-objective decision making problems. Our extended paper [4], serves as a guide for the application of explicitly multi-objective methods to difficult problems. © 2023 International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (www.ifaamas.org). All rights reserved.
- Authors: Hayes, Conor , Bargiacchi, Eugenio , Källström, Johan , Macfarlane, Matthew , Reymond, Mathieu , Verstraeten, Timothy , Zintgraf, Luisa , Dazeley, Richard , Heintz, Frederik , Howley, Enda , Irissappane, Aathirai , Mannion, Patrick , Nowé, Ann , Ramos, Gabriel , Restelli, Marcello , Vamplew, Peter , Roijers, Diederik
- Date: 2023
- Type: Text , Conference paper
- Relation: 22nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2023, London, 29 May to 2 June 2023, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS Vol. 2023-May, p. 1988-1990
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Real-world sequential decision-making tasks are usually complex, and require trade-offs between multiple - often conflicting - objectives. However, the majority of research in reinforcement learning (RL) and decision-theoretic planning assumes a single objective, or that multiple objectives can be handled via a predefined weighted sum over the objectives. Such approaches may oversimplify the underlying problem, and produce suboptimal results. This extended abstract outlines the limitations of using a semi-blind iterative process to solve multi-objective decision making problems. Our extended paper [4], serves as a guide for the application of explicitly multi-objective methods to difficult problems. © 2023 International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (www.ifaamas.org). All rights reserved.
Scalar reward is not enough JAAMAS Track
- Vamplew, Peter, Smith, Benjamin, Källström, Johan, Ramos, Gabriel, Rădulescu, Roxana, Roijers, Diederik, Hayes, Conor, Heintz, Frederik, Mannion, Patrick, Libin, Pieter, Dazeley, Richard, Foale, Cameron
- Authors: Vamplew, Peter , Smith, Benjamin , Källström, Johan , Ramos, Gabriel , Rădulescu, Roxana , Roijers, Diederik , Hayes, Conor , Heintz, Frederik , Mannion, Patrick , Libin, Pieter , Dazeley, Richard , Foale, Cameron
- Date: 2023
- Type: Text , Conference paper
- Relation: 22nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2023, London, 29 May to 2 June 2023, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS, Vol. 2023-May, p. 839-841
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Silver et al. [14] posit that scalar reward maximisation is sufficient to underpin all intelligence and provides a suitable basis for artificial general intelligence (AGI). This extended abstract summarises the counter-argument from our JAAMAS paper[19]. © 2023 International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (www.ifaamas.org). All rights reserved.
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »