- Title
- The training-performance puzzle : how can the past inform future training directions?
- Creator
- Gabbett, Tim
- Date
- 2020
- Type
- Text; Journal article
- Identifier
- http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/HandleResolver/1959.17/193975
- Identifier
- vital:18260
- Identifier
-
https://doi.org/10.4085/1062/6050.422.19
- Identifier
- ISSN:1062-6050 (ISSN)
- Abstract
- Over the past 20 years, research on the training-load-injury relationship has grown exponentially. With the benefit of more data, our understanding of the training-performance puzzle has improved. What were we thinking 20 years ago, and how has our thinking changed over time? Although early investigators attributed overuse injuries to excessive training loads, it has become clear that rapid spikes in training load, above what an athlete is accustomed, explain (at least in part) a large proportion of injuries. In this respect, it appears that overuse injuries may arise from athletes being underprepared for the load they are about to perform. However, a question of interest to both athletic trainers (ATs) and researchers is why some athletes sustain injury at low training loads, while others can tolerate much greater training loads? A higher chronic training load and well-developed aerobic fitness and lower body strength appear to moderate the training-injury relationship and provide a protective effect against spikes in load. The training-performance puzzle is complex and dynamic-at any given time, multiple inputs to injury and performance exist. The challenge facing researchers is obtaining large enough longitudinal data sets to capture the time-varying nature of physiological and musculoskeletal capacities and training-load data to adequately inform injury-prevention efforts. The training-performance puzzle can be solved, but it will take collaboration between researchers and clinicians as well as an understanding that efficacy (ie, how training load affects performance and injury in an idealized or controlled setting) does not equate to effectiveness (ie, how training load affects performance and injury in the real-world setting, where many variables cannot be controlled). © by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc www.natajournals.org
- Publisher
- National Athletic Trainers' Association Inc.
- Relation
- Journal of Athletic Training Vol. 55, no. 9 (2020), p. 874-884
- Rights
- All metadata describing materials held in, or linked to, the repository is freely available under a CC0 licence
- Rights
- Copyright © by the National Athletic Trainers' Association
- Rights
- Open Access
- Subject
- 3202 Clinical sciences; 4201 Allied health and rehabilitation science; 4207 Sports science and exercise; Athlete management; Training monitoring; Workload
- Full Text
- Reviewed
- Hits: 166
- Visitors: 182
- Downloads: 23
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | SOURCE1 | Published version | 1 MB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |