Effect of slope position on soil properties and soil moisture regime of Stagnosol in the vineyard
- Magdić, Ivan, Safner, Toni, Rubinić, Vedran, Rutić, Filip, Husnjak, Stjepan, Filipović, Vilim
- Authors: Magdić, Ivan , Safner, Toni , Rubinić, Vedran , Rutić, Filip , Husnjak, Stjepan , Filipović, Vilim
- Date: 2022
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics Vol. 70, no. 1 (2022), p. 62-73
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Hillslope hydrology in agricultural landscapes is complex due to a variety of hydropedological processes and field management possibilities. The aim was to test if there are any differences in soil properties and water regime along the hillslope and to compare vineyard rows (vine) with inter-rows (grass) area for those properties. The study determined that there are significant differences in the contents of soil particle fractions, pH, and humus content along the slope ( < 0.0001), with lower confidence level in bulk density < 0.05). Differences between row and inter-row space were significant for the pH, humus, and silt content, but for sand and clay content, and bulk density differences were not determined. The study determined differences in soil water content among five slope positions ( < 0.0001), and between row and inter-row vineyard space (all with < 0.05). Where in the upper slope positions (e. g., P1) soil water content was higher than on lower slope positions. Higher soil water content was observed at higher slope positions, associated with clay content. However, it can be concluded that the retention of moisture on the slope is more influenced by local-scale soil properties (primarily soil texture) and variability of the crop (row/inter-row) than the position on the slope.
- Authors: Magdić, Ivan , Safner, Toni , Rubinić, Vedran , Rutić, Filip , Husnjak, Stjepan , Filipović, Vilim
- Date: 2022
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics Vol. 70, no. 1 (2022), p. 62-73
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Hillslope hydrology in agricultural landscapes is complex due to a variety of hydropedological processes and field management possibilities. The aim was to test if there are any differences in soil properties and water regime along the hillslope and to compare vineyard rows (vine) with inter-rows (grass) area for those properties. The study determined that there are significant differences in the contents of soil particle fractions, pH, and humus content along the slope ( < 0.0001), with lower confidence level in bulk density < 0.05). Differences between row and inter-row space were significant for the pH, humus, and silt content, but for sand and clay content, and bulk density differences were not determined. The study determined differences in soil water content among five slope positions ( < 0.0001), and between row and inter-row vineyard space (all with < 0.05). Where in the upper slope positions (e. g., P1) soil water content was higher than on lower slope positions. Higher soil water content was observed at higher slope positions, associated with clay content. However, it can be concluded that the retention of moisture on the slope is more influenced by local-scale soil properties (primarily soil texture) and variability of the crop (row/inter-row) than the position on the slope.
Land management impacts on soil properties and initial soil erosion processes in olives and vegetable crops
- Bogunovic, Igor, Telak, Leon Josip, Pereira, Paulo, Filipovic, Vilim, Filipovic, Lana, Percin, Aleksandra, Durdevic, Boris, Birkás, Márta, Dekemati, Igor, Comino, Jesus Rodrigo
- Authors: Bogunovic, Igor , Telak, Leon Josip , Pereira, Paulo , Filipovic, Vilim , Filipovic, Lana , Percin, Aleksandra , Durdevic, Boris , Birkás, Márta , Dekemati, Igor , Comino, Jesus Rodrigo
- Date: 2020
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics Vol. 68, no. 4 (2020), p. 328-337
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: This research aims to assess the impacts of soil use management on runoff, soil losses, and their main soil controls in vegetable cropland (CROP), tilled olives (OT), and grass-covered olive orchards (OGC) on Leptosol in Croatia. Soil analysis and rainfall simulation experiments were conducted to quantify runoff (Run), soil, and nutrient losses. Bulk density (BD) was significantly higher at OT plots, in addition to the CROP plots. Water-stable aggregates (WSA), mean weight diameter (MWD), and soil organic matter (OM) were significantly higher in OGC plots compared to the other land uses. Run and soil loss (SL) were significantly higher in CROP and OT plots compared to the OGC plots. The CROP plots showed soil management that can be considered as unsustainable with 52, 68- and 146-times higher losses of phosphorus (P loss), nitrogen (N loss), and carbon (C loss) compared to the OGC plots. The principal component analysis showed that MWD was associated with vegetation cover (VC), water-holding capacity (WHC), WSA, OM, total nitrogen (TN), time to ponding (TP), and time to runoff (TR). These variables were negatively related to P2O5, Run, SL, and P, N, and C loss. Results indicate the need for the adoption of conservation strategies in croplands and olive orchards.
- Authors: Bogunovic, Igor , Telak, Leon Josip , Pereira, Paulo , Filipovic, Vilim , Filipovic, Lana , Percin, Aleksandra , Durdevic, Boris , Birkás, Márta , Dekemati, Igor , Comino, Jesus Rodrigo
- Date: 2020
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics Vol. 68, no. 4 (2020), p. 328-337
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: This research aims to assess the impacts of soil use management on runoff, soil losses, and their main soil controls in vegetable cropland (CROP), tilled olives (OT), and grass-covered olive orchards (OGC) on Leptosol in Croatia. Soil analysis and rainfall simulation experiments were conducted to quantify runoff (Run), soil, and nutrient losses. Bulk density (BD) was significantly higher at OT plots, in addition to the CROP plots. Water-stable aggregates (WSA), mean weight diameter (MWD), and soil organic matter (OM) were significantly higher in OGC plots compared to the other land uses. Run and soil loss (SL) were significantly higher in CROP and OT plots compared to the OGC plots. The CROP plots showed soil management that can be considered as unsustainable with 52, 68- and 146-times higher losses of phosphorus (P loss), nitrogen (N loss), and carbon (C loss) compared to the OGC plots. The principal component analysis showed that MWD was associated with vegetation cover (VC), water-holding capacity (WHC), WSA, OM, total nitrogen (TN), time to ponding (TP), and time to runoff (TR). These variables were negatively related to P2O5, Run, SL, and P, N, and C loss. Results indicate the need for the adoption of conservation strategies in croplands and olive orchards.
Representation of plot‐scale soil heterogeneity in dual‐domain effective flow and transport models with mass exchange
- Filipović, Vilim, Coquet, Yves, Gerke, Horst
- Authors: Filipović, Vilim , Coquet, Yves , Gerke, Horst
- Date: 2019
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Vadose zone journal Vol. 18, no. 1 (2019), p. 1-14
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Core Ideas The heterogeneity of soil hydraulic properties can be described with effective parameters. Increasing model complexity can be used to represent plot‐scale soil heterogeneity. One‐dimensional dual‐domain flow models are used to reproduce 2D preferential transport. Local subscale variability effects are included as mass transfer in an effective model. Agricultural soils are characterized by a structure that is strongly dependent on farming practices like tillage and trafficking. These practices can create compacted zones in the soil, thus initiating preferential flow. Two‐ or three‐dimensional models can be used to account for the spatial variability of the soil hydraulic and transport properties. Since it is challenging to obtain such data, it is logical to find simpler approaches. Our objective was to design a one‐dimensional (1D) modeling approach that effectively accounts for plot‐scale soil structure variability. A 1D dual‐permeability model was tested in which compacted soil was represented by a matrix domain and uncompacted soil by a fracture domain and eventually by assuming an additional immobile water region (MIM) in the fracture domain representing compacted clods embedded within the uncompacted soil. Models (1D) were compared with two‐dimensional single‐porosity (2D_SP) modeling results for water flow and Br− transport based on a previously performed field tracer experiment. Results indicated good agreement between 1D dual‐domain approaches (1D_DPERM and 1D_DPERM_MIM) and the 2D_SP representative model simulation results with high model efficiency and with respect to the field observations. This implied that a 1D vertical model description was sufficient to represent plot‐scale variability if smaller scale soil structure heterogeneities could be accounted for as effective parameters in dual‐domain models. Variation in the mass transfer term had a large effect on the vertical Br− profile distribution. The parameters describing the sizes and shapes of the domains were most relevant for estimating mass transfer between soil structural features in heterogeneous agricultural fields. Still, the calibration of the upscaling approach of two‐domain interactions in larger scale models remains challenging.
- Authors: Filipović, Vilim , Coquet, Yves , Gerke, Horst
- Date: 2019
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Vadose zone journal Vol. 18, no. 1 (2019), p. 1-14
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Core Ideas The heterogeneity of soil hydraulic properties can be described with effective parameters. Increasing model complexity can be used to represent plot‐scale soil heterogeneity. One‐dimensional dual‐domain flow models are used to reproduce 2D preferential transport. Local subscale variability effects are included as mass transfer in an effective model. Agricultural soils are characterized by a structure that is strongly dependent on farming practices like tillage and trafficking. These practices can create compacted zones in the soil, thus initiating preferential flow. Two‐ or three‐dimensional models can be used to account for the spatial variability of the soil hydraulic and transport properties. Since it is challenging to obtain such data, it is logical to find simpler approaches. Our objective was to design a one‐dimensional (1D) modeling approach that effectively accounts for plot‐scale soil structure variability. A 1D dual‐permeability model was tested in which compacted soil was represented by a matrix domain and uncompacted soil by a fracture domain and eventually by assuming an additional immobile water region (MIM) in the fracture domain representing compacted clods embedded within the uncompacted soil. Models (1D) were compared with two‐dimensional single‐porosity (2D_SP) modeling results for water flow and Br− transport based on a previously performed field tracer experiment. Results indicated good agreement between 1D dual‐domain approaches (1D_DPERM and 1D_DPERM_MIM) and the 2D_SP representative model simulation results with high model efficiency and with respect to the field observations. This implied that a 1D vertical model description was sufficient to represent plot‐scale variability if smaller scale soil structure heterogeneities could be accounted for as effective parameters in dual‐domain models. Variation in the mass transfer term had a large effect on the vertical Br− profile distribution. The parameters describing the sizes and shapes of the domains were most relevant for estimating mass transfer between soil structural features in heterogeneous agricultural fields. Still, the calibration of the upscaling approach of two‐domain interactions in larger scale models remains challenging.
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »