Practice priorities for acute care nursing : a Delphi study
- Authors: Connell, Clifford , Plummer, Virginia , Crawford, Kimberley , Endacott, Ruth , Foley, Pieternella , Griffiths, Debra , Innes, Kelli , Schwerdtle, Patricia , Walker, Lorraine , Morphet, Julia
- Date: 2020
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Journal of Clinical Nursing Vol. 29, no. 13-14 (2020), p. 2615-2625
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Aims and objectives: To describe the risk and frequency of challenges in acute care nursing, and the practice priorities in Australian hospital wards based upon expert consensus. Background: Health care is facing increasing demands that are negatively impacting upon the safety and quality of nursing care. Design: Delphi Method. Method: A three-round electronic Delphi method was used to collect and synthesise expert consensus opinion of 30 participants in Rounds One and Two of the survey, and 12 participants in Round Three. The study was carried out from July to December 2016. This study complied with the STROBE checklist. Results: High patient acuity or complexity, as well as inadequate bed space on wards, are “very high” risks that occur “often” and “very often,” respectively. The pressure to admit patients, delayed medical review and patient boarding are all “high” risks that occur “often.” Though only occurring “sometimes,” inadequate numbers and skill mix of staff, suboptimal communication and early or inappropriate discharge all pose a “very high” risk to patient care. Conclusion: The key practice priorities for nurse managers should include the design, implementation and evaluation of sustainable system-wide frameworks, processes and models of care that address patient boarding, communication and discharge processes, job satisfaction, staffing numbers and expertise. Relevance to clinical practice: This study provides a description of the challenges that face acute care nursing in the provision of safe and high-quality care. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
What factors influence midwives to provide obstetric high dependency care on the delivery suite or request care be escalated away from the obstetric unit? Findings of a focus group study
- Authors: James, Alison , Cooper, Simon J. , Stenhouse, Elizabeth , Endacott, Ruth
- Date: 2019
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Bmc Pregnancy and Childbirth Vol. 19, no. 1 (2019), p. 1-15
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background In the United Kingdom, midwives will engage in discussions with the multidisciplinary team as to whether they can provide Obstetric High Dependency Care (OHDC) on the Delivery Suite or whether a woman's care should be escalated to the critical care team. This study aimed to explore the question: What factors influence midwives to provide OHDC or request care be escalated away from the obstetric unit in hospitals remote from tertiary referral centres? Methods Focus groups were undertaken with midwives (n = 34) across three obstetric units in England, with annual birth rates ranging from 1500 to 5000 per annum, in District General Hospitals. Three scenarios in the form of video vignettes of handover were used as triggers for the focus groups. Scenario 1; severe pre-eclampsia, physiologically unstable 2; major postpartum haemorrhage requiring invasive monitoring 3; recent admission of woman with chest pain receiving facial oxygen and requiring continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring. Two focus groups were conducted in each of the obstetric units with experienced midwives. Data were analysed using a qualitative framework approach. Results Factors influencing midwives' care escalation decisions included the care environment, a woman's diagnosis and fetal or neonatal factors. The overall plan of care including the need for ECG and invasive monitoring were also influential factors. Midwives in the smallest obstetric unit did not have access to the facilities for OHDC provision. Midwives in the larger obstetric units provided OHDC but identified varying degrees of skill and sometimes used 'workarounds' to facilitate care provision. Midwifery staffing levels, skill mix and workload were also influential. Some differences of opinion were evident between midwives working in the same obstetric units as to whether OHDC could be provided and the support they would enlist to help them provide it. Reliance on clinical guidelines appeared variable. Conclusions Findings indicate that there may be inequitable OHDC provision at a local level. Organisationally robust systems are required to promote safe, equitable OHDC care including skills development for midwives and precise escalation guidelines to minimise workarounds. Training for midwives must include strategies that prevent skills fade.
Managing patient deterioration: assessing teamwork and individual performance
- Authors: Cooper, Simon J. , Cant, Robyn , Porter, Joanne , Missen, Karen , Sparkes, Louise , McConnell-Henry, Tracy , Endacott, Ruth
- Date: 2013
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Emergency Medicine Journal Vol. 30, no. 5 (2013), p.
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Objective To assess the ability of rural Australian nurse teams to manage deteriorating patients. Methods This quasi-experimental design used pre- and post-intervention assessments and observation to evaluate nurses' simulated clinical performance. Registered nurses (n=44) from two hospital wards completed a formative knowledge assessment and three team-based video recorded scenarios (Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE)). Trained patient actors simulated deteriorating patients. Skill performance and situation awareness were measured and team performance was rated using the Team Emergency Assessment Measure. Results Knowledge in relation to patient deterioration management varied (mean 63%, range 27–100%) with a median score of 64%. Younger nurses with a greater number of working hours scored the highest (p=0.001). OSCE performance was generally low with a mean performance of 54%, but performance was maintained despite the increasing complexity of the scenarios. Situation awareness was generally low (median 50%, mean 47%, range 17–83%, SD 14.03) with significantly higher levels in younger participants (r=−0.346, p=0.021). Teamwork ratings averaged 57% with significant associations between the subscales (Leadership, Teamwork and Task Management) (p<0.006), the global rating scale (p<0.001) and two of the OSCE measures (p<0.049). Feedback from participants following the programme indicated significant improvements in knowledge, confidence and competence (p<0.001). Conclusion Despite a satisfactory knowledge base, the application of knowledge was low with notable performance deficits in these demanding and stressful situations. The identification and management of patient deterioration needs to be taught in professional development programmes incorporating high fidelity simulation techniques. The Team Emergency assessment tool proved to be a valid measure of team performance in patient deterioration scenarios.
Mixed methods research: a design for emergency care research?
- Authors: Cooper, Simon J. , Porter, Joanne , Endacott, Ruth
- Date: 2010
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Emergency Medicine Journal Vol. 28, no. (2010), p. 682-685
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: This paper follows previous publications on generic qualitative approaches, qualitative designs and action research in emergency care by this group of authors. Contemporary views on mixed methods approaches are considered, with a particular focus on the design choice and the amalgamation of qualitative and quantitative data emphasising the timing of data collection for each approach, their relative ‘weight’ and how they will be mixed. Mixed methods studies in emergency care are reviewed before the variety of methodological approaches and best practice considerations are presented. The use of mixed methods in clinical studies is increasing, aiming to answer questions such as ‘how many’ and ‘why’ in the same study, and as such are an important and useful approach to many key questions in emergency care.
Qualitative Research: Specific designs for qualitative research in emergency care?
- Authors: Cooper, Simon J. , Chapman, Ysanne , Endacott, Ruth
- Date: 2009
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Emergency Medicine Journal Vol. 26, no. (2009), p. 773-776
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: This article follows our description of generic qualitative approaches, focusing on the specific designs of ethnography, grounded theory and phenomenology. Distinguishing features are described, including methodological approaches and methods for enhancing rigour. The use of these designs in emergency care is unusual but informative, and important work has been produced. Whether used in a pure or applied manner, it is likely that such approaches will add to our understanding of the emergency world.