Interprofessional simulation of birth in a non-maternity setting for pre-professional students
- McLelland, Gayle, Perera, Chantal, Morphet, Julia, McKenna, Lisa, Hall, Helen, Williams, Brett, Cant, Robyn, Stow, Jill
- Authors: McLelland, Gayle , Perera, Chantal , Morphet, Julia , McKenna, Lisa , Hall, Helen , Williams, Brett , Cant, Robyn , Stow, Jill
- Date: 2017
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Nurse Education Today Vol. 58, no. (2017), p. 25-31
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background Simulation-based learning is an approach recommended for teaching undergraduate health professionals. There is a scarcity of research around interprofessional simulation training for pre-professional students in obstetric emergencies that occur prior to arrival at the maternity ward. Objectives The primary aims of the study were to examine whether an interprofessional team-based simulated birth scenario would improve undergraduate paramedic, nursing, and midwifery students' self-efficacy scores and clinical knowledge when managing birth in an unplanned location. The secondary aim was to assess students' satisfaction with the newly developed interprofessional simulation. Design Quasi-experimental descriptive study with repeated measures. Setting Simulated hospital emergency department. Participants Final year undergraduate paramedic, nursing, and midwifery students. Methods Interprofessional teams of five students managed a simulated unplanned vaginal birth, followed by debriefing. Students completed a satisfaction with simulation survey. Serial surveys of clinical knowledge and self-efficacy were conducted at three time points. Results Twenty-four students participated in one of five simulation scenarios. Overall, students' self-efficacy and confidence in ability to achieve a successful birth outcome was significantly improved at one month (p < 0.001) with a magnitude of increase (effect) of 40% (r = 0.71) and remained so after a further three months. Clinical knowledge was significantly increased in only one of three student groups: nursing (p = 0.04; r = 0.311). Students' satisfaction with the simulation experience was high (M = 4.65 / 5). Conclusions Results from this study indicate that an interprofessional simulation of a birth in an unplanned setting can improve undergraduate paramedic, nursing and midwifery students' confidence working in an interprofessional team. There was a significant improvement in clinical knowledge of the nursing students (who had least content about managing birth in their program). All students were highly satisfied with the interprofessional simulation experience simulation. © 2017 Elsevier Ltd
Setting priorities for health education research : a mixed methods study
- Palermo, Claire, King, Olivia, Brock, Tina, Brown, Ted, Crampton, Paul, Hall, Helen, Macaulay, Janet, Morphet, Julia, Mundy, Matthew, Oliaro, Louise, Paynter, Sophie, Williams, Brett, Wright, Caroline, Rees, Charlotte
- Authors: Palermo, Claire , King, Olivia , Brock, Tina , Brown, Ted , Crampton, Paul , Hall, Helen , Macaulay, Janet , Morphet, Julia , Mundy, Matthew , Oliaro, Louise , Paynter, Sophie , Williams, Brett , Wright, Caroline , Rees, Charlotte
- Date: 2019
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Medical Teacher Vol. 41, no. 9 (2019), p. 1029-1038
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Introduction: Identifying priority research topics that meet the needs of multiple stakeholders should maximize research investment. Aim: To identify priorities for health education research. Methods: A three-stage sequential mixed methods study was conducted. Priorities for health education research were identified through a qualitative survey with 104 students, patients, academics, and clinicians across five health sciences and 12 professions (stage 1). These findings were analyzed using framework analysis and transposed into a quantitative survey whereby 780 stakeholders rated and ranked the identified priorities. Descriptive statistics identified priorities, exploratory factor analysis grouped priorities and differences between stakeholders were determined using Mann–Whitney U tests (stage 2). Six individual or group interviews with 16 participants (stage 3) further explicated the results from previous stages. Results: Of 30 priorities identified, the top were: how best to ensure students develop the required skills for work; how to promote resiliency and well-being in students; and ensuring the curriculum prepares students for work. For the majority of priorities, no significant differences were found between different stakeholder groups. Conclusions: These findings will be used to inform health educational research strategy both locally and nationally. Further research should explore if setting priorities can be translated effectively into education research policy and practice. © 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
- Authors: Palermo, Claire , King, Olivia , Brock, Tina , Brown, Ted , Crampton, Paul , Hall, Helen , Macaulay, Janet , Morphet, Julia , Mundy, Matthew , Oliaro, Louise , Paynter, Sophie , Williams, Brett , Wright, Caroline , Rees, Charlotte
- Date: 2019
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Medical Teacher Vol. 41, no. 9 (2019), p. 1029-1038
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Introduction: Identifying priority research topics that meet the needs of multiple stakeholders should maximize research investment. Aim: To identify priorities for health education research. Methods: A three-stage sequential mixed methods study was conducted. Priorities for health education research were identified through a qualitative survey with 104 students, patients, academics, and clinicians across five health sciences and 12 professions (stage 1). These findings were analyzed using framework analysis and transposed into a quantitative survey whereby 780 stakeholders rated and ranked the identified priorities. Descriptive statistics identified priorities, exploratory factor analysis grouped priorities and differences between stakeholders were determined using Mann–Whitney U tests (stage 2). Six individual or group interviews with 16 participants (stage 3) further explicated the results from previous stages. Results: Of 30 priorities identified, the top were: how best to ensure students develop the required skills for work; how to promote resiliency and well-being in students; and ensuring the curriculum prepares students for work. For the majority of priorities, no significant differences were found between different stakeholder groups. Conclusions: These findings will be used to inform health educational research strategy both locally and nationally. Further research should explore if setting priorities can be translated effectively into education research policy and practice. © 2019, © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »