API : an index for quantifying a scholar's academic potential
- Ren, Jing, Wang, Lei, Wang, Kailai, Yu, Shuo, Hou, Mingliang, Lee, Ivan, Kong, Xiangje, Xia, Feng
- Authors: Ren, Jing , Wang, Lei , Wang, Kailai , Yu, Shuo , Hou, Mingliang , Lee, Ivan , Kong, Xiangje , Xia, Feng
- Date: 2019
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: IEEE Access Vol. 7, no. (2019), p. 178675-178684
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: In the context of big scholarly data, various metrics and indicators have been widely applied to evaluate the impact of scholars from different perspectives, such as publication counts, citations, ${h}$-index, and their variants. However, these indicators have limited capacity in characterizing prospective impacts or achievements of scholars. To solve this problem, we propose the Academic Potential Index (API) to quantify scholar's academic potential. Furthermore, an algorithm is devised to calculate the value of API. It should be noted that API is a dynamic index throughout scholar's academic career. By applying API to rank scholars, we can identify scholars who show their academic potentials during the early academic careers. With extensive experiments conducted based on the Microsoft Academic Graph dataset, it can be found that the proposed index evaluates scholars' academic potentials effectively and captures the variation tendency of their academic impacts. Besides, we also apply this index to identify rising stars in academia. Experimental results show that the proposed API can achieve superior performance in identifying potential scholars compared with three baseline methods. © 2019 IEEE.
- Authors: Ren, Jing , Wang, Lei , Wang, Kailai , Yu, Shuo , Hou, Mingliang , Lee, Ivan , Kong, Xiangje , Xia, Feng
- Date: 2019
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: IEEE Access Vol. 7, no. (2019), p. 178675-178684
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: In the context of big scholarly data, various metrics and indicators have been widely applied to evaluate the impact of scholars from different perspectives, such as publication counts, citations, ${h}$-index, and their variants. However, these indicators have limited capacity in characterizing prospective impacts or achievements of scholars. To solve this problem, we propose the Academic Potential Index (API) to quantify scholar's academic potential. Furthermore, an algorithm is devised to calculate the value of API. It should be noted that API is a dynamic index throughout scholar's academic career. By applying API to rank scholars, we can identify scholars who show their academic potentials during the early academic careers. With extensive experiments conducted based on the Microsoft Academic Graph dataset, it can be found that the proposed index evaluates scholars' academic potentials effectively and captures the variation tendency of their academic impacts. Besides, we also apply this index to identify rising stars in academia. Experimental results show that the proposed API can achieve superior performance in identifying potential scholars compared with three baseline methods. © 2019 IEEE.
On the correlation between research complexity and academic competitiveness
- Ren, Jing, Lee, Ivan, Wang, Lei, Chen, Xiangtai, Xia, Feng
- Authors: Ren, Jing , Lee, Ivan , Wang, Lei , Chen, Xiangtai , Xia, Feng
- Date: 2020
- Type: Text , Conference paper
- Relation: 22nd International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, ICADL 2020, Kyoto, Japan, 30 November to 1 December 2020, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) Vol. 12504 LNCS, p. 416-422
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Academic capacity is a common way to reflect the educational level of a country or district. The aim of this study is to explore the difference between the scientific research level of institutions and countries. By proposing an indicator named Citation-weighted Research Complexity Index (CRCI), we profile the academic capacity of universities and countries with respect to research complexity. The relationships between CRCI of universities and other relevant academic evaluation indicators are examined. To explore the correlation between academic capacity and economic level, the relationship between research complexity and GDP per capita is analysed. With experiments on the Microsoft Academic Graph data set, we investigate publications across 183 countries and universities from the Academic Ranking of World Universities in 19 research fields. Experimental results reveal that universities with higher research complexity have higher fitness. In addition, for developed countries, the development of economics has a positive correlation with scientific research. Furthermore, we visualize the current level of scientific research across all disciplines from a global perspective. © 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
- Authors: Ren, Jing , Lee, Ivan , Wang, Lei , Chen, Xiangtai , Xia, Feng
- Date: 2020
- Type: Text , Conference paper
- Relation: 22nd International Conference on Asia-Pacific Digital Libraries, ICADL 2020, Kyoto, Japan, 30 November to 1 December 2020, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) Vol. 12504 LNCS, p. 416-422
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Academic capacity is a common way to reflect the educational level of a country or district. The aim of this study is to explore the difference between the scientific research level of institutions and countries. By proposing an indicator named Citation-weighted Research Complexity Index (CRCI), we profile the academic capacity of universities and countries with respect to research complexity. The relationships between CRCI of universities and other relevant academic evaluation indicators are examined. To explore the correlation between academic capacity and economic level, the relationship between research complexity and GDP per capita is analysed. With experiments on the Microsoft Academic Graph data set, we investigate publications across 183 countries and universities from the Academic Ranking of World Universities in 19 research fields. Experimental results reveal that universities with higher research complexity have higher fitness. In addition, for developed countries, the development of economics has a positive correlation with scientific research. Furthermore, we visualize the current level of scientific research across all disciplines from a global perspective. © 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »