http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:13838 Wed 07 Apr 2021 14:01:56 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:12244 Wed 07 Apr 2021 14:00:32 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:11681 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:56:58 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:11121 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:56:27 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:11117 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:56:26 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:10749 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:56:06 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:7391 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:46:51 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:7394 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:46:51 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:7399 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:46:51 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:7321 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:46:47 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:5480 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:45:07 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:5483 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:45:07 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:5488 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:45:07 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:5471 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:45:06 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:5444 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:45:05 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:5438 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:45:04 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:5443 1 session. By week 12, 1540 players were recruited but training attendance (reach) decreased to <50%. When players attended training, the majority adopted the full programme—ranging from 96% (week 1) to above 80% until week 20. The most common reasons for low adoption were players being injured, too sore, being late for training or choosing their own warm-up. Conclusions: The training programme's reach was highest preseason and halved at the playing season's end. However, when players attended training sessions, their adoption was high and remained close to 70% by season end. For sports injury prevention programmes to be fully effective across a season, attention also needs to be given to (1) encouraging players to attend formal training sessions and (2) considering the possibility of some form of programme delivery outside of formal training.]]> Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:45:04 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:5361 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:45:00 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:5125 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:44:45 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:4741 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:44:16 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:4581 120 g). Results: Clegg hammer readings ranged from 25 to 301 g. Clegg hammer hardness categories from low/normal to high/normal were associated with the majority of injuries, with only 3.7% (13 injuries) on unacceptably high hardness and 0.3% (1 injury) on the unacceptably low hardness locations. Relative to the preferred range of hardness, the risk of sustaining an injury on low/normal hardness locations was 1.31 (95%CI: 1.06-1.62) times higher and 1.82 (95%CI: 1.17-2.85) times higher on locations with unacceptably high hardness. The more severe injuries occurred with low/normal ground hardness. Conclusions: Despite the low number of injuries, the risk of sustaining an injury on low/normal and unacceptably hard grounds was significantly greater than on the preferred range of hardness. Notably, the severity of the injuries sustained on unacceptably hard grounds was lower than for other categories of hardness. © 2012 Sports Medicine Australia.]]> Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:44:03 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:4092 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:43:25 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:4070 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:43:24 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:1953 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:33:01 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:1922 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:32:59 AEST ]]>