http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:14065 Wed 07 Apr 2021 14:02:08 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:19120 Tue 26 Mar 2024 15:01:10 AEDT ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:16621 Tue 04 Oct 2022 13:59:31 AEDT ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:19230 0.78), and the inter-item correlation validity was identified by Pearson’s product-moment coefficient of r =.712. Internal reliability was confirmed with a Cronbach’s alpha = 0.83. Based upon the participation completion rate, the survey tool was deemed applicable and feasible. The majority of respondents believed that nurses have altruistic attributes; however, perceptions of nursing varied significantly when rating factors influencing the physical, emotional, and social well-being of a nurse. In later stages of training, respondents were more likely to agree that nursing is physically and emotionally demanding and that nurses experience social isolation due to shift work, finding it difficult to achieve a work-life balance. Conclusions: The PRN survey tool was found to be valid, reliable, and feasible. Future use and outcomes from PRN assessments may lead to changes to nursing curricula that enhance nursing students’ perceptions of nursing. © 2023, The Author(s).]]> Mon 06 May 2024 12:04:11 AEST ]]>