http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:13978 Wed 07 Apr 2021 14:02:04 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:13402 Wed 07 Apr 2021 14:01:33 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:11584 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:56:53 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:11583 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:56:53 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:11570 ), and thus when a < was traced with the moving finger, it caused a > to be felt at the stationary finger. When asked to report the experience, participants predominantly reported the cutaneous stimulus, seemingly being ignorant of the kinesthetic stimulus. This appears to be an intrahaptic capture phenomenon, which is of interest because it suggests that conflict between intrahaptic sensory stimuli can go unnoticed; sometimes we are unaware of how we moved, and sometimes we do not know what we touched. The results are interpreted in light of optimal integration, perceptual suppression, reafference suppression, and inattentional blindness.]]> Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:56:52 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:6196 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:45:47 AEST ]]>