http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:12839 Wed 07 Apr 2021 14:01:02 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:11728 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:57:00 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:11117 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:56:26 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:7399 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:46:51 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:5444 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:45:05 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:5443 1 session. By week 12, 1540 players were recruited but training attendance (reach) decreased to <50%. When players attended training, the majority adopted the full programme—ranging from 96% (week 1) to above 80% until week 20. The most common reasons for low adoption were players being injured, too sore, being late for training or choosing their own warm-up. Conclusions: The training programme's reach was highest preseason and halved at the playing season's end. However, when players attended training sessions, their adoption was high and remained close to 70% by season end. For sports injury prevention programmes to be fully effective across a season, attention also needs to be given to (1) encouraging players to attend formal training sessions and (2) considering the possibility of some form of programme delivery outside of formal training.]]> Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:45:04 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:4092 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:43:25 AEST ]]>