http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:12244 Wed 07 Apr 2021 14:00:32 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:11691 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:56:58 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:10749 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:56:06 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:7417 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Compared to objective measures, the subjective assessments were more accurate for ground hardness than for soil moisture levels and raters were just as likely to underestimate or overestimate the condition under review. This has implications for future sports injury aetiology studies that include ground condition assessments and particularly the use of subjective measures to underpin the development of future injury prevention strategies.]]> Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:46:52 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:6937 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:46:28 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:5475 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:45:06 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:5471 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:45:06 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:5444 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:45:05 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:5443 1 session. By week 12, 1540 players were recruited but training attendance (reach) decreased to <50%. When players attended training, the majority adopted the full programme—ranging from 96% (week 1) to above 80% until week 20. The most common reasons for low adoption were players being injured, too sore, being late for training or choosing their own warm-up. Conclusions: The training programme's reach was highest preseason and halved at the playing season's end. However, when players attended training sessions, their adoption was high and remained close to 70% by season end. For sports injury prevention programmes to be fully effective across a season, attention also needs to be given to (1) encouraging players to attend formal training sessions and (2) considering the possibility of some form of programme delivery outside of formal training.]]> Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:45:04 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:5361 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:45:00 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:4741 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:44:16 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:4660 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:44:10 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:4581 120 g). Results: Clegg hammer readings ranged from 25 to 301 g. Clegg hammer hardness categories from low/normal to high/normal were associated with the majority of injuries, with only 3.7% (13 injuries) on unacceptably high hardness and 0.3% (1 injury) on the unacceptably low hardness locations. Relative to the preferred range of hardness, the risk of sustaining an injury on low/normal hardness locations was 1.31 (95%CI: 1.06-1.62) times higher and 1.82 (95%CI: 1.17-2.85) times higher on locations with unacceptably high hardness. The more severe injuries occurred with low/normal ground hardness. Conclusions: Despite the low number of injuries, the risk of sustaining an injury on low/normal and unacceptably hard grounds was significantly greater than on the preferred range of hardness. Notably, the severity of the injuries sustained on unacceptably hard grounds was lower than for other categories of hardness. © 2012 Sports Medicine Australia.]]> Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:44:03 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:4272 120 g) and two independent raters assessed the likelihood of each injury being related to ground hardness. Injuries sustained on tested grounds were related to the ground hardness measures. Overall, 31 match injuries were reported; 6.5% were rated as likely to be related to ground hardness, 16.1% as possibly related and 74.2% as unlikely to be related and 3.2% unknown. The two injuries likely to be related to ground hardness were sustained while diving to catch a ball resulting, in a graze/laceration from contact with hard ground. Overall, 31/38 (82%) ground assessments were rated as having 'unacceptably high' hardness and all others as 'high/normal' hardness. Only one injury occurred on an objectively tested ground. It remains unclear if ground hardness is a contributing factor to the most common injury mechanism of being struck by the ball, and needs to be confirmed in future larger-scale studies. © 2011 Sports Medicine Australia.]]> Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:43:43 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:4237 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:43:40 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:4070 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:43:24 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:3634 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:34:38 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:3320 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:34:18 AEST ]]> http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:1953 Wed 07 Apr 2021 13:33:01 AEST ]]>