Epistemological approach to the process of practice
- Dazeley, Richard, Kang, Byeongho
- Authors: Dazeley, Richard , Kang, Byeongho
- Date: 2008
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Minds and Machines Vol. 18, no. 4 (2008), p. 547-567
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Systems based on symbolic knowledge have performed extremely well in processing reason, yet, remain beset with problems of brittleness in many domains. Connectionist approaches do similarly well in emulating interactive domains, however, have struggled when modelling higher brain functions. Neither of these dichotomous approaches, however, have provided many inroads into the area of human reasoning that psychology and sociology refer to as the process of practice. This paper argues that the absence of a model for the process of practise in current approaches is a significant contributor to brittleness. This paper will investigate how the process of practise relates to deeper forms of contextual representations of knowledge. While researchers and developers of knowledge based systems have often incorporated the notion of context they treat context as a static entity, neglecting many connectionists' work in learning hidden and dynamic contexts. This paper argues that the omission of these higher forms of context is one of the fundamental problems in the application and interpretation of symbolic knowledge. Finally, these ideas for modelling context will lead to the reinterpretation of situation cognition which makes a significant step towards a philosophy of knowledge that could lead to the modelling of the process of practice. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
- Description: C1
- Authors: Dazeley, Richard , Kang, Byeongho
- Date: 2008
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Minds and Machines Vol. 18, no. 4 (2008), p. 547-567
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Systems based on symbolic knowledge have performed extremely well in processing reason, yet, remain beset with problems of brittleness in many domains. Connectionist approaches do similarly well in emulating interactive domains, however, have struggled when modelling higher brain functions. Neither of these dichotomous approaches, however, have provided many inroads into the area of human reasoning that psychology and sociology refer to as the process of practice. This paper argues that the absence of a model for the process of practise in current approaches is a significant contributor to brittleness. This paper will investigate how the process of practise relates to deeper forms of contextual representations of knowledge. While researchers and developers of knowledge based systems have often incorporated the notion of context they treat context as a static entity, neglecting many connectionists' work in learning hidden and dynamic contexts. This paper argues that the omission of these higher forms of context is one of the fundamental problems in the application and interpretation of symbolic knowledge. Finally, these ideas for modelling context will lead to the reinterpretation of situation cognition which makes a significant step towards a philosophy of knowledge that could lead to the modelling of the process of practice. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
- Description: C1
Generalising symbolic knowledge in online classification and prediction
- Dazeley, Richard, Kang, Byeongho
- Authors: Dazeley, Richard , Kang, Byeongho
- Date: 2009
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) Vol. 5465 LNAI, no. (15 December 2008 through 16 December 2008 2009), p. 91-108
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Increasingly, researchers and developers of knowledge based systems (KBS) have been incorporating the notion of context. For instance, Repertory Grids, Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) and Ripple-Down Rules (RDR) all integrate either implicit or explicit contextual information. However, these methodologies treat context as a static entity, neglecting many connectionists' work in learning hidden and dynamic contexts, which aid their ability to generalize. This paper presents a method that models hidden context within a symbolic domain in order to achieve a level of generalisation. The method developed builds on the already established Multiple Classification Ripple-Down Rules (MCRDR) approach and is referred to as Rated MCRDR (RM). RM retains a symbolic core, while using a connection based approach to learn a deeper understanding of the captured knowledge. This method is applied to a number of classification and prediction environments and results indicate that the method can learn the information that experts have difficulty providing. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009.
- Description: 2003006509
- Authors: Dazeley, Richard , Kang, Byeongho
- Date: 2009
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) Vol. 5465 LNAI, no. (15 December 2008 through 16 December 2008 2009), p. 91-108
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Increasingly, researchers and developers of knowledge based systems (KBS) have been incorporating the notion of context. For instance, Repertory Grids, Formal Concept Analysis (FCA) and Ripple-Down Rules (RDR) all integrate either implicit or explicit contextual information. However, these methodologies treat context as a static entity, neglecting many connectionists' work in learning hidden and dynamic contexts, which aid their ability to generalize. This paper presents a method that models hidden context within a symbolic domain in order to achieve a level of generalisation. The method developed builds on the already established Multiple Classification Ripple-Down Rules (MCRDR) approach and is referred to as Rated MCRDR (RM). RM retains a symbolic core, while using a connection based approach to learn a deeper understanding of the captured knowledge. This method is applied to a number of classification and prediction environments and results indicate that the method can learn the information that experts have difficulty providing. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009.
- Description: 2003006509
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »