Australian nursing students’ experience of bullying and/or harassment during clinical placement
- Budden, Lea, Birks, Melanie, Cant, Robyn, Bagley, Tracy, Park, Tanya
- Authors: Budden, Lea , Birks, Melanie , Cant, Robyn , Bagley, Tracy , Park, Tanya
- Date: 2017
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Collegian Vol. 24, no. 2 (2017), p. 125-133
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Bullying and harassment in nursing are unacceptable behaviours in the workplace. There is a large body of evidence relating this problem, however little of it focuses on the experiences of nursing students. This prospective cross-sectional survey investigated Australian undergraduate nursing students’ (N = 888) experiences of bullying and/or harassment during clinical placement. Half (50.1%) of the students indicated they had experienced this behaviour in the previous 12 months. Younger students were more likely to be bullied/harassed than older students (p = 0.05). Participants identified perpetrators of bullying/harassment as registered nurses (56.6%), patients (37.4%), enrolled nurse's (36.4%), clinical facilitators (25.9%), preceptors (24.6%), nurse managers (22.8%) and other student nurses (11.8%). The majority of students reported that the experience of being bullied/harassed made them feel anxious (71.5%) and depressed (53.6%). Almost a third of students (32.8%) indicated that these experiences negatively affected the standard of care they provided to patients with many (46.9%) reconsidering nursing as their intended career. In the face of workforce attrition in nursing, the findings of this study have implications for education providers, clinical institutions and the profession at large. © 2015 Australian College of Nursing Ltd
Measuring the quality of nursing clinical placements and the development of the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET) in a mixed methods co-design project
- Cooper, Simon J., Cant, Robyn, Waters, Donna, Luders, Elise, Henderson, Amanda, Willetts, Georgina, Tower, Marion, Reid-Searl, Kerry, Ryan, Colleen, Hood, Kerry
- Authors: Cooper, Simon J. , Cant, Robyn , Waters, Donna , Luders, Elise , Henderson, Amanda , Willetts, Georgina , Tower, Marion , Reid-Searl, Kerry , Ryan, Colleen , Hood, Kerry
- Date: 2020
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: BMC Nursing Vol. 19, no. 1 (2020), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: The quality of nursing clinical placements has been found to vary. Placement evaluation tools for nursing students are available but lack contemporary reviews of clinical settings. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a feasible, valid and reliable clinical placement evaluation tool applicable to nursing student placements in Australia. Methods: An exploratory mixed methods co-design project. Phase 1 included a literature review; expert rating of potential question items and Nominal Group Technique meetings with a range of stakeholders for item development. Phase 2 included on-line pilot testing of the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET) with 1263 nursing students, across all year levels at six Australian Universities and one further education college in 2019–20, to confirm validity, reliability and feasibility. Results: The PET included 19-items (rated on a 5-point agreement scale) and one global satisfaction rating (a 10-point scale). Placements were generally positively rated. The total scale score (19 items) revealed a median student rating of 81 points from a maximum of 95 and a median global satisfaction rating of 9/10. Criterion validity was confirmed by item correlation: Intra-class Correlation Co-efficient ICC =.709; scale total to global score r =.722; and items to total score ranging from.609 to.832. Strong concurrent validity was demonstrated with the Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision Scale (r =.834). Internal reliability was identified and confirmed in two subscale factors: Clinical Environment (Cronbach’s alpha =.94) and Learning Support (alpha =.96). Based on the short time taken to complete the survey (median 3.5 min) and students’ comments, the tool was deemed applicable and feasible. Conclusions: The PET was found to be valid, reliable and feasible. Use of the tool as a quality assurance measure is likely to improve education and practice in clinical environments. Further international evaluation of the instrument is required to fully determine its psychometric properties. © 2020, The Author(s).
- Description: This work was funded by the Council of Deans of Nursing and Midwifery (Australia and New Zealand) – 2019. The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript.
- Authors: Cooper, Simon J. , Cant, Robyn , Waters, Donna , Luders, Elise , Henderson, Amanda , Willetts, Georgina , Tower, Marion , Reid-Searl, Kerry , Ryan, Colleen , Hood, Kerry
- Date: 2020
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: BMC Nursing Vol. 19, no. 1 (2020), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: The quality of nursing clinical placements has been found to vary. Placement evaluation tools for nursing students are available but lack contemporary reviews of clinical settings. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop a feasible, valid and reliable clinical placement evaluation tool applicable to nursing student placements in Australia. Methods: An exploratory mixed methods co-design project. Phase 1 included a literature review; expert rating of potential question items and Nominal Group Technique meetings with a range of stakeholders for item development. Phase 2 included on-line pilot testing of the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET) with 1263 nursing students, across all year levels at six Australian Universities and one further education college in 2019–20, to confirm validity, reliability and feasibility. Results: The PET included 19-items (rated on a 5-point agreement scale) and one global satisfaction rating (a 10-point scale). Placements were generally positively rated. The total scale score (19 items) revealed a median student rating of 81 points from a maximum of 95 and a median global satisfaction rating of 9/10. Criterion validity was confirmed by item correlation: Intra-class Correlation Co-efficient ICC =.709; scale total to global score r =.722; and items to total score ranging from.609 to.832. Strong concurrent validity was demonstrated with the Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision Scale (r =.834). Internal reliability was identified and confirmed in two subscale factors: Clinical Environment (Cronbach’s alpha =.94) and Learning Support (alpha =.96). Based on the short time taken to complete the survey (median 3.5 min) and students’ comments, the tool was deemed applicable and feasible. Conclusions: The PET was found to be valid, reliable and feasible. Use of the tool as a quality assurance measure is likely to improve education and practice in clinical environments. Further international evaluation of the instrument is required to fully determine its psychometric properties. © 2020, The Author(s).
- Description: This work was funded by the Council of Deans of Nursing and Midwifery (Australia and New Zealand) – 2019. The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript.
Nursing degree students’ clinical placement experiences in Australia: A survey design
- Luders, Elise, Cooper, Simon J., Cant, Robyn, Waters, Donna, Tower, Marion
- Authors: Luders, Elise , Cooper, Simon J. , Cant, Robyn , Waters, Donna , Tower, Marion
- Date: 2021
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Nurse Education in Practice Vol. 54, no. (2021), p.
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Aim: This study aimed to evaluate Australian nursing students’ views of placements at seven tertiary education institutions with the use of the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET). Background: Clinical placements are a core element of healthcare education programs around the world (Chuan and Barnett, 2012) with undergraduate nursing students required to complete a prescribed number of hours as part of their degree. The quality of nursing clinical placements varies with a range of positive and negative learning experiences. Design: A survey design was used with a contemporary survey tool– the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET). Using Qualtrics software (Qualtrics, 2005) the on-line survey was distributed to approximately 6265 undergraduate nursing students at six Australian universities and one Technical and Further Education (TAFE) college where Bachelor of Nursing degree students were enrolled. Three Australian States were covered. Sites were selected where a project team member was employed. Methods: A total of 1263 nursing students completed the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET) − 19 items (rated 1–5), one global rating (rated 1–10) − following placement in three Australian States (July 2019−February 2020). Most - 618 (48.9%) completed a placement in acute care with placements positively rated overall. Results: The total PET mean score was 78.3% with 29.8% being ‘extremely satisfied’ (10 out of 10 – Item 20). However, 11.0% were dissatisfied with global ratings of four or less, whilst ratings between States differed significantly (p = <0.001). One third of respondents answered a free text statement relating to placement experiences, with significantly more comments from older students (p = <0.001) and from those with ratings in the lower range (p = <0.001). Three core themes emerged: 1. Staff Attitudes to Students, 2. Environment and 3. Lifestyle. Conclusions: Whilst students’ clinical experiences in Australia tend to be positive a minority reported exposure to negative staff attitudes, in unsafe environments, with lifestyle detriments. Further work is required to understand and enhance student experiences. © 2021. **Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 5 including Federation University Australia affiliate “Elise Luders, Simon Cooper, Robyn Cant" is provided in this record**
Nursing student voices : a qualitative thematic synthesis of education elements supporting nursing students' clinical learning during placement
- Cant, Robyn, Ryan, Colleen, Hughes, Lynda, Ossenberg, Christine, Cooper, Simon
- Authors: Cant, Robyn , Ryan, Colleen , Hughes, Lynda , Ossenberg, Christine , Cooper, Simon
- Date: 2024
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Nurse Education in Practice Vol. 80, no. (2024), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Aim: to report a thematic synthesis of students’ narratives in free text comments from a national quality survey of Australian nursing degree students’ clinical placements. Background: Nursing student evaluation surveys are submitted to the Australian National Placement Evaluation Centre. Students in 36 Australian nursing programs are included. Design: Thematic synthesis of nursing students’ narrative comments. Methods: Data were sourced from 10,226 surveys submitted between July and December 2023. From these, the 3640 free text comments were extracted and tabulated to form the sample for synthesis. Three authors conducted a thematic synthesis and all five authors agreed on the findings. Findings: Student's comments generally portrayed a positive learning culture in clinical placement environments. One dominant theme ‘Support’ was interpreted as giving deeper meaning to students’ perceptions of the help and encouragement of placement facility staff. Three subthemes ‘Welcoming environment’, ‘Providing learning opportunities’ and ‘Teaching strategies’ described students’ ideas of what elements contribute to learning. Ten ways of teaching were revealed in students’ narratives as education activities. Students commonly referred to staff supporters, illustrating that various staff worked to ensure students were supervised during clinical skills practice and that students’ learning objectives were addressed. Conclusions: Staff-student relationships are paramount for students’ learning and students’ narratives revealed perceptions of a generally positive learning environment. The notion of support is implied as vital to nursing students’ positive experience of clinical learning during placements. Curriculum designers, university course convenors and placement partners may use the findings identified in this study to ensure academic and placement facility staff are aware of how best to support students. In this way, institutions may narrow the gap between successful and less successful nursing student clinical placements. © 2024 The Authors
- Authors: Cant, Robyn , Ryan, Colleen , Hughes, Lynda , Ossenberg, Christine , Cooper, Simon
- Date: 2024
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Nurse Education in Practice Vol. 80, no. (2024), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Aim: to report a thematic synthesis of students’ narratives in free text comments from a national quality survey of Australian nursing degree students’ clinical placements. Background: Nursing student evaluation surveys are submitted to the Australian National Placement Evaluation Centre. Students in 36 Australian nursing programs are included. Design: Thematic synthesis of nursing students’ narrative comments. Methods: Data were sourced from 10,226 surveys submitted between July and December 2023. From these, the 3640 free text comments were extracted and tabulated to form the sample for synthesis. Three authors conducted a thematic synthesis and all five authors agreed on the findings. Findings: Student's comments generally portrayed a positive learning culture in clinical placement environments. One dominant theme ‘Support’ was interpreted as giving deeper meaning to students’ perceptions of the help and encouragement of placement facility staff. Three subthemes ‘Welcoming environment’, ‘Providing learning opportunities’ and ‘Teaching strategies’ described students’ ideas of what elements contribute to learning. Ten ways of teaching were revealed in students’ narratives as education activities. Students commonly referred to staff supporters, illustrating that various staff worked to ensure students were supervised during clinical skills practice and that students’ learning objectives were addressed. Conclusions: Staff-student relationships are paramount for students’ learning and students’ narratives revealed perceptions of a generally positive learning environment. The notion of support is implied as vital to nursing students’ positive experience of clinical learning during placements. Curriculum designers, university course convenors and placement partners may use the findings identified in this study to ensure academic and placement facility staff are aware of how best to support students. In this way, institutions may narrow the gap between successful and less successful nursing student clinical placements. © 2024 The Authors
Students’ evaluation of professional experience placement quality in a pre-registration nursing programme : a cross-sectional survey
- Chu, Ginger, Pitt, Victoria, Cant, Robyn, Johnson, Amanda, Inder, Kerry
- Authors: Chu, Ginger , Pitt, Victoria , Cant, Robyn , Johnson, Amanda , Inder, Kerry
- Date: 2024
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Nurse Education in Practice Vol. 75, no. (2024), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Aim: To evaluate the quality of student nurses' experiences and overall satisfaction with professional experience placements at a regional Australian University. Background: Professional experience placements are a crucial component of pre-registration nursing programs. However, the absence of standardised approaches to assess placement quality has created uncertainty on what constitutes a high-quality placement from a student's perspective. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was administered online to 800 second and third year undergraduate nursing students at an Australian university. The survey contains demographic questions (e.g., year of study, placement specialty, duration, setting and geographic location), a validated Placement Evaluation Tool and free-text comments. The Placement Evaluation Tool is a 20-item questionnaire that measures two key factors: clinical environment (factor 1), learning support (factor 2) and overall satisfaction of students’ learning experiences during a professional experience placement. A descriptive analysis was conducted to evaluate the student's overall experience and satisfaction. Multivariate linear regression was used to assess the relationship between the quality of the student experience and demographics and presented as beta coefficient (
- Authors: Chu, Ginger , Pitt, Victoria , Cant, Robyn , Johnson, Amanda , Inder, Kerry
- Date: 2024
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Nurse Education in Practice Vol. 75, no. (2024), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Aim: To evaluate the quality of student nurses' experiences and overall satisfaction with professional experience placements at a regional Australian University. Background: Professional experience placements are a crucial component of pre-registration nursing programs. However, the absence of standardised approaches to assess placement quality has created uncertainty on what constitutes a high-quality placement from a student's perspective. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was administered online to 800 second and third year undergraduate nursing students at an Australian university. The survey contains demographic questions (e.g., year of study, placement specialty, duration, setting and geographic location), a validated Placement Evaluation Tool and free-text comments. The Placement Evaluation Tool is a 20-item questionnaire that measures two key factors: clinical environment (factor 1), learning support (factor 2) and overall satisfaction of students’ learning experiences during a professional experience placement. A descriptive analysis was conducted to evaluate the student's overall experience and satisfaction. Multivariate linear regression was used to assess the relationship between the quality of the student experience and demographics and presented as beta coefficient (
Core competencies for registered nurse preceptors : a mapping review of quantitative studies
- Ryan, Colleen, Cant, Robyn, Hughes, Lynda, Ahchay, Darrelle, Strickland, Karen
- Authors: Ryan, Colleen , Cant, Robyn , Hughes, Lynda , Ahchay, Darrelle , Strickland, Karen
- Date: 2024
- Type: Text , Journal article , Review
- Relation: Nursing Open Vol. 11, no. 2 (2024), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Aims: To review the contemporary international literature on nurse preceptor competencies and map the components and their descriptors. Review Methods: A mapping review. Data Sources: Articles reporting evidence-based and validated Registered Nurse (RN) preceptor competencies published between 2013 and 2022 were identified. Open access databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar and the library healthcare databases Scopus and CINAHL were searched. The authors collaborated at each review stage that included screening, article selection, tabulation, mapping and preparation of findings. Results: Seven quantitative studies were included. Three were based on existing nurse preceptor competency data sets and four were purposely developed using collaborative research methods. Each study validated findings through a survey of nurse stakeholders. Three key competencies shared across all studies were ‘facilitating teaching’, ‘being a role model’ and ‘evaluating student's performance’. The number of competency categories ranged from three to 10 and the accompanying item descriptors from 9 to 83. Although terminology describing data sets was inconsistent, similarity was seen across competency domains. Conclusion: The contemporary nursing preceptor role is considered an emerging specialist education role. The results offer a set of validated preceptor competency descriptors, applicable to practice, that provide insight into ways employers may recruit, support and retain nurse preceptors. Implications for the Profession: The mapped results provide a concise summary of nurse preceptor competency research internationally that can inform further development of RN preceptors. Impact: This review addresses the lack of consensus around nursing preceptor competencies for clinical supervision of undergraduate nursing students. Seven competency domains were identified describing key preceptor role capabilities. The domains Facilitator’, ‘Role model’ and ‘Evaluator’ featured across the included studies: ‘More than 300 competency descriptors were reported’. Our review results could better prepare RN preceptors for their important role. Employers of RN preceptors could use the results to design performance competencies that may enhance nursing preceptorship. Reporting Method: This review adheres to the PRISMA-ScR EQUATOR guidelines as the recommended reporting method for mapping reviews. © 2023 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
- Authors: Ryan, Colleen , Cant, Robyn , Hughes, Lynda , Ahchay, Darrelle , Strickland, Karen
- Date: 2024
- Type: Text , Journal article , Review
- Relation: Nursing Open Vol. 11, no. 2 (2024), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Aims: To review the contemporary international literature on nurse preceptor competencies and map the components and their descriptors. Review Methods: A mapping review. Data Sources: Articles reporting evidence-based and validated Registered Nurse (RN) preceptor competencies published between 2013 and 2022 were identified. Open access databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar and the library healthcare databases Scopus and CINAHL were searched. The authors collaborated at each review stage that included screening, article selection, tabulation, mapping and preparation of findings. Results: Seven quantitative studies were included. Three were based on existing nurse preceptor competency data sets and four were purposely developed using collaborative research methods. Each study validated findings through a survey of nurse stakeholders. Three key competencies shared across all studies were ‘facilitating teaching’, ‘being a role model’ and ‘evaluating student's performance’. The number of competency categories ranged from three to 10 and the accompanying item descriptors from 9 to 83. Although terminology describing data sets was inconsistent, similarity was seen across competency domains. Conclusion: The contemporary nursing preceptor role is considered an emerging specialist education role. The results offer a set of validated preceptor competency descriptors, applicable to practice, that provide insight into ways employers may recruit, support and retain nurse preceptors. Implications for the Profession: The mapped results provide a concise summary of nurse preceptor competency research internationally that can inform further development of RN preceptors. Impact: This review addresses the lack of consensus around nursing preceptor competencies for clinical supervision of undergraduate nursing students. Seven competency domains were identified describing key preceptor role capabilities. The domains Facilitator’, ‘Role model’ and ‘Evaluator’ featured across the included studies: ‘More than 300 competency descriptors were reported’. Our review results could better prepare RN preceptors for their important role. Employers of RN preceptors could use the results to design performance competencies that may enhance nursing preceptorship. Reporting Method: This review adheres to the PRISMA-ScR EQUATOR guidelines as the recommended reporting method for mapping reviews. © 2023 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »