Quantifying success in science : an overview
- Bai, Xiaomei, Pan, Habxiao, Hou, Jie, Guo, Teng, Lee, Ivan, Xia, Feng
- Authors: Bai, Xiaomei , Pan, Habxiao , Hou, Jie , Guo, Teng , Lee, Ivan , Xia, Feng
- Date: 2020
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: IEEE Access Vol. 8, no. (2020), p. 123200-123214
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Quantifying success in science plays a key role in guiding funding allocations, recruitment decisions, and rewards. Recently, a significant amount of progresses have been made towards quantifying success in science. This lack of detailed analysis and summary continues a practical issue. The literature reports the factors influencing scholarly impact and evaluation methods and indices aimed at overcoming this crucial weakness. We focus on categorizing and reviewing the current development on evaluation indices of scholarly impact, including paper impact, scholar impact, and journal impact. Besides, we summarize the issues of existing evaluation methods and indices, investigate the open issues and challenges, and provide possible solutions, including the pattern of collaboration impact, unified evaluation standards, implicit success factor mining, dynamic academic network embedding, and scholarly impact inflation. This paper should help the researchers obtaining a broader understanding of quantifying success in science, and identifying some potential research directions. © 2013 IEEE.
- Description: This work was supported in part by the Liaoning Provincial Key Research and Development Guidance Project under Grant 2018104021, and in part by the Liaoning Provincial Natural Fund Guidance Plan under Grant 20180550011.
- Authors: Bai, Xiaomei , Pan, Habxiao , Hou, Jie , Guo, Teng , Lee, Ivan , Xia, Feng
- Date: 2020
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: IEEE Access Vol. 8, no. (2020), p. 123200-123214
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Quantifying success in science plays a key role in guiding funding allocations, recruitment decisions, and rewards. Recently, a significant amount of progresses have been made towards quantifying success in science. This lack of detailed analysis and summary continues a practical issue. The literature reports the factors influencing scholarly impact and evaluation methods and indices aimed at overcoming this crucial weakness. We focus on categorizing and reviewing the current development on evaluation indices of scholarly impact, including paper impact, scholar impact, and journal impact. Besides, we summarize the issues of existing evaluation methods and indices, investigate the open issues and challenges, and provide possible solutions, including the pattern of collaboration impact, unified evaluation standards, implicit success factor mining, dynamic academic network embedding, and scholarly impact inflation. This paper should help the researchers obtaining a broader understanding of quantifying success in science, and identifying some potential research directions. © 2013 IEEE.
- Description: This work was supported in part by the Liaoning Provincial Key Research and Development Guidance Project under Grant 2018104021, and in part by the Liaoning Provincial Natural Fund Guidance Plan under Grant 20180550011.
API : an index for quantifying a scholar's academic potential
- Ren, Jing, Wang, Lei, Wang, Kailai, Yu, Shuo, Hou, Mingliang, Lee, Ivan, Kong, Xiangje, Xia, Feng
- Authors: Ren, Jing , Wang, Lei , Wang, Kailai , Yu, Shuo , Hou, Mingliang , Lee, Ivan , Kong, Xiangje , Xia, Feng
- Date: 2019
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: IEEE Access Vol. 7, no. (2019), p. 178675-178684
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: In the context of big scholarly data, various metrics and indicators have been widely applied to evaluate the impact of scholars from different perspectives, such as publication counts, citations, ${h}$-index, and their variants. However, these indicators have limited capacity in characterizing prospective impacts or achievements of scholars. To solve this problem, we propose the Academic Potential Index (API) to quantify scholar's academic potential. Furthermore, an algorithm is devised to calculate the value of API. It should be noted that API is a dynamic index throughout scholar's academic career. By applying API to rank scholars, we can identify scholars who show their academic potentials during the early academic careers. With extensive experiments conducted based on the Microsoft Academic Graph dataset, it can be found that the proposed index evaluates scholars' academic potentials effectively and captures the variation tendency of their academic impacts. Besides, we also apply this index to identify rising stars in academia. Experimental results show that the proposed API can achieve superior performance in identifying potential scholars compared with three baseline methods. © 2019 IEEE.
- Authors: Ren, Jing , Wang, Lei , Wang, Kailai , Yu, Shuo , Hou, Mingliang , Lee, Ivan , Kong, Xiangje , Xia, Feng
- Date: 2019
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: IEEE Access Vol. 7, no. (2019), p. 178675-178684
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: In the context of big scholarly data, various metrics and indicators have been widely applied to evaluate the impact of scholars from different perspectives, such as publication counts, citations, ${h}$-index, and their variants. However, these indicators have limited capacity in characterizing prospective impacts or achievements of scholars. To solve this problem, we propose the Academic Potential Index (API) to quantify scholar's academic potential. Furthermore, an algorithm is devised to calculate the value of API. It should be noted that API is a dynamic index throughout scholar's academic career. By applying API to rank scholars, we can identify scholars who show their academic potentials during the early academic careers. With extensive experiments conducted based on the Microsoft Academic Graph dataset, it can be found that the proposed index evaluates scholars' academic potentials effectively and captures the variation tendency of their academic impacts. Besides, we also apply this index to identify rising stars in academia. Experimental results show that the proposed API can achieve superior performance in identifying potential scholars compared with three baseline methods. © 2019 IEEE.
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »