The evolution of Turing Award Collaboration Network : bibliometric-level and network-level metrics
- Kong, Xiangjie, Shi, Yajie, Wang, Wei, Ma, Kai, Wan, Liangtian, Xia, Feng
- Authors: Kong, Xiangjie , Shi, Yajie , Wang, Wei , Ma, Kai , Wan, Liangtian , Xia, Feng
- Date: 2019
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems Vol. 6, no. 6 (2019), p. 1318-1328
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: The year of 2017 for the 50th anniversary of the Turing Award, which represents the top-level award in the computer science field, is a milestone. We study the long-term evolution of the Turing Award Collaboration Network, and it can be considered as a microcosm of the computer science field from 1974 to 2016. First, scholars tend to publish articles by themselves at the early stages, and they began to focus on tight collaboration since the late 1980s. Second, compared with the same scale random network, although the Turing Award Collaboration Network has small-world properties, it is not a scale-free network. The reason may be that the number of collaborators per scholar is limited. It is impossible for scholars to connect to others freely (preferential attachment) as the scale-free network. Third, to measure how far a scholar is from the Turing Award, we propose a metric called the Turing Number (TN) and find that the TN decreases gradually over time. Meanwhile, we discover the phenomenon that scholars prefer to gather into groups to do research with the development of computer science. This article presents a new way to explore the evolution of academic collaboration network in the field of computer science by building and analyzing the Turing Award Collaboration Network for decades. © 2014 IEEE.
- Authors: Kong, Xiangjie , Shi, Yajie , Wang, Wei , Ma, Kai , Wan, Liangtian , Xia, Feng
- Date: 2019
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems Vol. 6, no. 6 (2019), p. 1318-1328
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: The year of 2017 for the 50th anniversary of the Turing Award, which represents the top-level award in the computer science field, is a milestone. We study the long-term evolution of the Turing Award Collaboration Network, and it can be considered as a microcosm of the computer science field from 1974 to 2016. First, scholars tend to publish articles by themselves at the early stages, and they began to focus on tight collaboration since the late 1980s. Second, compared with the same scale random network, although the Turing Award Collaboration Network has small-world properties, it is not a scale-free network. The reason may be that the number of collaborators per scholar is limited. It is impossible for scholars to connect to others freely (preferential attachment) as the scale-free network. Third, to measure how far a scholar is from the Turing Award, we propose a metric called the Turing Number (TN) and find that the TN decreases gradually over time. Meanwhile, we discover the phenomenon that scholars prefer to gather into groups to do research with the development of computer science. This article presents a new way to explore the evolution of academic collaboration network in the field of computer science by building and analyzing the Turing Award Collaboration Network for decades. © 2014 IEEE.
The gene of scientific success
- Kong, Xiangjie, Zhang, Jun, Zhang, Da, Bu, Yi, Ding, Ying, Xia, Feng
- Authors: Kong, Xiangjie , Zhang, Jun , Zhang, Da , Bu, Yi , Ding, Ying , Xia, Feng
- Date: 2020
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data Vol. 14, no. 4 (2020), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: This article elaborates how to identify and evaluate causal factors to improve scientific impact. Currently, analyzing scientific impact can be beneficial to various academic activities including funding application, mentor recommendation, discovering potential cooperators, and the like. It is universally acknowledged that high-impact scholars often have more opportunities to receive awards as an encouragement for their hard work. Therefore, scholars spend great efforts in making scientific achievements and improving scientific impact during their academic life. However, what are the determinate factors that control scholars' academic success? The answer to this question can help scholars conduct their research more efficiently. Under this consideration, our article presents and analyzes the causal factors that are crucial for scholars' academic success. We first propose five major factors including article-centered factors, author-centered factors, venue-centered factors, institution-centered factors, and temporal factors. Then, we apply recent advanced machine learning algorithms and jackknife method to assess the importance of each causal factor. Our empirical results show that author-centered and article-centered factors have the highest relevancy to scholars' future success in the computer science area. Additionally, we discover an interesting phenomenon that the h-index of scholars within the same institution or university are actually very close to each other. © 2020 ACM.
- Authors: Kong, Xiangjie , Zhang, Jun , Zhang, Da , Bu, Yi , Ding, Ying , Xia, Feng
- Date: 2020
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data Vol. 14, no. 4 (2020), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: This article elaborates how to identify and evaluate causal factors to improve scientific impact. Currently, analyzing scientific impact can be beneficial to various academic activities including funding application, mentor recommendation, discovering potential cooperators, and the like. It is universally acknowledged that high-impact scholars often have more opportunities to receive awards as an encouragement for their hard work. Therefore, scholars spend great efforts in making scientific achievements and improving scientific impact during their academic life. However, what are the determinate factors that control scholars' academic success? The answer to this question can help scholars conduct their research more efficiently. Under this consideration, our article presents and analyzes the causal factors that are crucial for scholars' academic success. We first propose five major factors including article-centered factors, author-centered factors, venue-centered factors, institution-centered factors, and temporal factors. Then, we apply recent advanced machine learning algorithms and jackknife method to assess the importance of each causal factor. Our empirical results show that author-centered and article-centered factors have the highest relevancy to scholars' future success in the computer science area. Additionally, we discover an interesting phenomenon that the h-index of scholars within the same institution or university are actually very close to each other. © 2020 ACM.
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »