Poor cardiorespiratory fitness is a risk factor for sepsis in patients awaiting liver transplantation
- Authors: Wallen, Matthew , Woodward, Aidan , Hall, Adrian , Skinner, Tina , Coombes, Jeff , Macdonald, Graeme
- Date: 2019
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Transplantation Vol. , no. 103(3) (2019), p.529-535
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background Patients with advanced liver disease are at increased risk of infection and other complications. A significant proportion of patients also have poor fitness and low muscle mass. The primary aim of this study was to investigate if cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition are risk factors for sepsis and other complications of advanced liver disease. Methods Patients being listed for liver transplantation underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing to determine ventilatory threshold (VT). Computed tomography was used to measure skeletal muscle and subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue indexes. All unplanned hospital admissions, deaths or delistings prior to transplantation were recorded. Results Eighty-two patients [aged 55.1 (50.6–59.4) years, median (interquartile range); male 87%] achieved a median VT of 11.7 (9.7–13.4) mL[BULLET OPERATOR]kg-1[BULLET OPERATOR]min-1. Their median MELD-Na score was 18 (14–22); and 37 had hepatocellular carcinoma. There were 50 admissions in 31 patients; with 16 admissions for sepsis in 13 patients. Patients with sepsis had a significantly lower VT [sepsis 9.5 (7.8–11.9), no sepsis 11.8 (10.5–13.8) mL[BULLET OPERATOR]kg-1[BULLET OPERATOR]min-1; P=0.003]. No body composition variables correlated with sepsis, nor were there any significant associations between VT and unplanned admissions for other indications. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that VT was independently associated with a diagnosis of sepsis (P=0.03). Poisson regression revealed that VT was a significant predictor for the number of septic episodes (P=0.02); independent of age, MELD-Na score, hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis, presence of ascites, and beta-blocker use. Conclusion Poor cardiorespiratory fitness is an independent risk factor for the development of sepsis in advanced liver disease.
Low-volume high intensity interval training is sufficient to ameliorate the severity of the metabolic syndrome
- Authors: Ramos, Joyce , Dalleck, Lance , Borrani, Fabio , Beetham, Kassia , Wallen, Matthew , Mallard, Alistair , Clark, Bronwyn , Gomersall, Sjaan , Keating, Shelley , Fassett, Robert , Coombes, Jeff
- Date: 2017
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders Vol. 15, no. 7 (2017), p. 319-328
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: BACKGROUND: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is superior to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) at improving cardiometabolic risk. However, the optimal volume of HIIT to reduce the severity of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) has yet to be investigated. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of different volumes of HIIT and MICT on MetS severity (MetS z-score). METHODS: This was a substudy of the "Exercise in prevention of Metabolic Syndrome" (EX-MET) multicenter trial, reporting data collected at the Brisbane site. Ninety-nine adults diagnosed with MetS were randomized to one of the following 16-week interventions: (1) MICT [n = 34, 30 min at 60%-70% heart rate (HR) peak/session, 150 min/week]; (2) 4HIIT (n = 34, 4 × 4 min bouts at 85%-95% HR peak, interspersed with 3 min active recovery at 50%-70% HR peak, 114 min/week); or (3) 1HIIT (n = 31, 1 × 4 min bout at 85%-95% HR peak, 51 min/week). Z-scores were derived from levels of MetS risk factors before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Eighty-one participants completed post-testing (MICT, n = 26; 4HIIT, n = 28, 1HIIT, n = 27). After excluding 16 participants who had a change in medication dosage or type during the intervention, a total of 65 participants were included in the analysis [MICT, n = 22, age 55 ± 10 years, body mass index (BMI) 32 ± 6 kg/m; 4HIIT, n = 22, 56 ± 10 years, 35 ± 9 kg/m2; 1HIIT, n = 21, 57 ± 8 years, 32 ± 5 kg/m). MetS severity reduced following all interventions (pre- to post-MetS z-score: MICT, 1.80 ± 1.93 to 0.90 ± 1.93; 4HIIT, 2.75 ± 2.56 to 2.17 ± 2.71; 1HIIT, 2.48 ± 3.38 to 0.84 ± 2.98), with no significant differences between groups. There were no reported adverse events that were directly related to the exercise interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Low-volume HIIT (51 min/week) was as effective as high-volume HIIT (114 min/week) and MICT (150 min/week) in ameliorating MetS severity.
High-intensity interval training improves cardiorespiratory fitness in cancer patients and survivors : a meta-analysis
- Authors: Wallen, Matthew , Hennessy, Declan , Brown, Stephen , Evans, Luke , Rawstorn, Jonathan , Wong Shee, Anna , Hall, Adrian
- Date: 2020
- Type: Text , Journal article , Review
- Relation: European Journal of Cancer Care Vol. 29, no. 4 (2020), p.
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Objective: The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) and usual care (UC) on cardiorespiratory fitness (peak V̇O2) in cancer patients and survivors. Secondary objectives were to compare the effects of HIIT versus MICT and UC on other cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) indices. Safety and adherence to HIIT were also evaluated. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials were undertaken using eligible studies from electronic database searching (inception—December 2019). Mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were compared and heterogeneity assessed using Cochran's Q and I2 statistic. Results: Twelve eligible studies included 516 participants with post-intervention CPET data. No serious adverse events occurred. Adherence to HIIT ranged between 71.2% and 95.6%. HIIT had significantly higher peak V̇O2 compared with UC (MD = 2.11 ml kg−1 min−1, 95% CI 0.75–3.47, p =.002). No significant difference was found between HIIT and MICT (MD = 2.03 ml kg−1 min−1, 95%CI −0.75–4.83, p =.15). HIIT was more effective than UC to improve peak oxygen pulse (MD = 1.59 ml/beat, 95%CI 0.06–3.12, p =.04). Conclusions: Quantitative assessment of HIIT studies indicates good compliance, with a significant effect on peak V̇O2 and peak oxygen pulse compared with UC in cancer patients and survivors. HIIT demonstrates a comparable effect with MICT to improve peak V̇O2. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
- Description: Western Alliance Academic Health Science Centre , WA-739501