Field vaccination of sheep with a larval-specific antigen of the gastrointestinal nematode, Haemonchus contortus, confers significant protection against an experimental challenge infection
- Authors: Piedrafita, David , De Veer, Michael , Lydall, Jayne , Kraska, Troy , Elhay, Martin , Meeusen, Els
- Date: 2012
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Vaccine Vol. 30, no. 50 (2012), p. 7199-7204
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: The availability of effective vaccines would add a valuable tool to the management of gastrointestinal nematode infections in livestock. While some experimental vaccines have shown protection in laboratory trials, few have been tested in the field. In the present study, eight month old sheep kept on pasture were treated with anthelmintic 8 weeks before vaccination with a larval surface antigen of the nematode parasite, Haemonchus contortus, under a commercially acceptable protocol, i.e. 2 immunizations using a commercial adjuvant; they were then given a controlled challenge infection 4 weeks later in indoor pens. Vaccination of sheep with 4 increasing doses of antigen resulted in significant reductions of 61% and 27% in cumulative faecal egg counts in the two highest dose groups, and a 69% reduction in worm burden in the highest dose group. Blood loss, as determined by packed cell volume, was also significantly reduced in the highest dose group of sheep. One outlier sheep showed an unusual increase in egg count without a concomitant increase in worm burden compared to the control sheep, indicating a vaccine-induced stress response. Antigen-specific serum antibody levels steadily increased in sheep while on pasture and decreased when transported to indoor pens. No difference in antibody levels could be detected between vaccinated and unvaccinated sheep, but all showed increased antibody levels compared to uninfected control sheep kept in indoors pens for 2–3 months, suggesting sheep were sensitized to the larval antigen either from low dose pasture contamination or cross reaction with pasture-related antigens. The results of these studies confirm the protective properties of the larval surface antigen and its protective effect when vaccinations are performed in the field.
The effect of different adjuvants on immune parameters and protection following vaccination of sheep with a larval-specific antigen of the gastrointestinal nematode, Haemonchus contortus
- Authors: Piedrafita, David , Preston, Sarah , Kemp, Joanna , De Veer, Michael , Sherrard, Jayne , Kraska, Troy , Elhay, Martin , Meeusen, Els
- Date: 2013
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: PLoS ONE. Vol. 8, no. 10, (Art. no.e78357) (2013), p. 1-8
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: It has recently been recognised that vaccine adjuvants play a critical role in directing the nature of a vaccine induced effector response. In the present study, several adjuvants were evaluated for their ability to protect sheep after field vaccination with the larval-specific Haemonchus contortus antigen, HcsL3. Using a suboptimal antigen dose, aluminium adjuvant was shown to reduce the cumulative faecal egg counts (cFEC) and worm burden by 23% and 25% respectively, in agreement with a previous study. The addition of Quil A to the aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine brought cFEC back to control levels. Vaccination with the adjuvant DEAE-dextran almost doubled the protection compared to the aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine resulting in 40% and 41% reduction in cFEC and worm counts compared to controls. Examination of skin responses following i.d. injection of exsheathed L3, revealed that cFEC was negatively correlated with wheal size and tissue eosinophils for the DEAE-dextran and aluminium-adjuvanted groups respectively. These studies have for the first time shown the potential of DEAE-dextran adjuvant for helminth vaccines, and discovered significant cellular correlates of vaccine-induced protection. Funding: Australian Research Council Linkage grant LP0668945 and the ARC-Centre of Excellence in Structural and Functional Microbial Genomics. The funders have no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscrip