The effect of low molecular weight surfactants and proteins on surface stickiness of sucrose during powder formation through spray drying
- Authors: Adhikari, Benu , Howes, Tony , Wood, B. J. , Bhandari, Bhesh
- Date: 2009
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Journal of Food Engineering Vol. 94, no. 2 (2009), p. 135 -143
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: The effect of competitive surface migration of proteins and low molecular weight surfactants (LMS) on the powder recovery in spray drying of highly sticky sugar-rich food has been studied. Sucrose was chosen as a model sugar-rich food because it cannot be easily converted into a pure amorphous powder through spray drying. Sodium caseinate (Na-C) and hydrolyzed whey protein isolate (WPI) were used as model proteins. Polysorbate 80 (Tween-80) and sodium dodecyl sulfate (Na-DS) were used as model non-ionic and ionic LMS. A sucrose solution was spray dried without any additives to establish a base case. Following this, spray drying trials of sucrose-protein solutions were conducted. The sucrose: protein ratio was maintained at 99.5:0.5 and 99.0:1.0. Finally, 0.05% of Tween-80 and Na-DS, on a nominal feed basis, were individually added to the solutions and spray dried. The solid concentration of all of the feed solutions was set at 25% and the inlet and outlet temperatures were maintained at 170 °C and 70 °C, respectively. Powder recovery was determined using a standard procedure and taken as an indicator of the surface stickiness. Coverage of the particle surface by the proteins was determined through elemental surface analysis and a nitrogen balance. It was found that in the absence of LMS, the proteins covered up to 55% of the particle surface and increased the powder recovery to between 84% and 85%. Formation of a glassy protein-rich film acts to reduce the surface stickiness of sucrose droplets. However, when LMS was added to the sucrose-protein solutions, the recovery dropped to zero in the case of Tween-80. In the case of Na-DS the recoveries ranged to 39% and 68%. At these recoveries 83% and 59% of the protein, respectively, was displaced from the surface. This drastic effect of surfactant types on the powder recovery is explained using the Orogenic Displacement model. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Surface protein coverage and its implications on spray-drying of model sugar-rich foods: Solubility, powder production and characterisation
- Authors: Jayasundera, Mithila , Adhikari, Benu , Howes, Tony , Aldred, Peter
- Date: 2011
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Food Chemistry Vol. 128, no. 4 (2011), p. 1003-1016
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: We have investigated the amount of protein required to produce amorphous sugar powders through spray-drying. Pea protein isolate was used as a model plant protein and sodium caseinate was used as a model dairy protein. Powder recovery in a laboratory spray dryer was used as a measure of the ease of spray drying for a given formulation. More than 80% of amorphous sucrose and fructose was produced with the addition of sodium caseinate, while the pea protein isolate was able to produce only recoveries of less than 50% of amorphous sucrose. Sensitivity of low molecular weight surfactants has been demonstrated using both ionic (sodium stearoyl lactylate) and non-ionic (polysorbate-80) surfactants. Spray-dried powders were subjected to physico-chemical characterisation and dissolution experiments. The maximum solubility of all powders was obtained after 5 min of dissolution. The solubility of the sodium caseinate increased by 6-7% in the presence of fructose and low molecular weight surfactants. The solubility of the amorphous powders of sucrose-pea protein isolate was found to be lower than amorphous powders of sucrose-sodium caseinate and fructose-sodium caseinate. The addition of sucrose in water increased the solubility of the pea protein isolate from 16.84% to more than 83%. The non-ionic surfactant (Tween-80) has reduced the solubility of sucrose-pea protein isolate-Tween-80 powders significantly (p < 0.05) compared to those of sucrose-pea protein isolate-sodium stearoyl lactylate powders. The solubility of sucrose-sodium caseinate powders was comparable to that of pure sodium caseinate, indicating that addition of sucrose into 0.13% sodium caseinate does not have any significant effect on the solubility of this protein at this concentration. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.