The effects of proteins and low molecular weight surfactants on spray drying of model sugar-rich foods: Powder production and characterisation
- Authors: Jayasundera, Mithila , Adhikari, Benu , Adhikari, Raju , Aldred, Peter
- Date: 2011
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Journal of Food Engineering Vol. 104, no. 2 (2011), p. 259-271
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: The effects of proteins and low molecular weight surfactants (LMS) on spray drying and powder characteristics of model sugar-rich foods have been studied. Fructose and sucrose were selected as model sugar-rich foods and sodium caseinate (NaCas) was selected as a model protein. Sodium stearoyl lactylate (SSL) and Polysorbate 80 (Tween-80) were chosen as model ionic and non-ionic low molecular weight surfactants. The feed solutions for spray drying had 25% solid concentration in all. To achieve identical powder recoveries of the order of 80% much higher NaCas:fructose ratio (30:70) was required compared to NaCas:sucrose ratio (0.5:99.5) which corresponded to 7.89% and 0.13% of sodium caseinate (initial bulk concentration), respectively. There was no change in powder recovery when the SSL concentration was increased from 0.01% to 0.05% in fructose-NaCas-SSL solution and also addition of 0.01% Tween-80 into fructose-NaCas solution did not affect the powder recovery (76.7 ± 2.3%), however, it was slightly affected with the increase of Tween-80 to 0.05% (69.0 ± 1.9%). At NaCas concentration above critical micelle concentration of NaCas (3% w/w), the presence of up to 0.05% low molecular weight surfactants had either no effect or minimal effect on the surface coverage of the droplets/particles and also on the powder recovery depending on the nature of the low molecular weight surfactants. The surface protein coverage and the recovery of the powder in sucrose-protein systems were very sensitive in the presence of low molecular weight surfactants due to being below the critical micelle concentration of NaCas. SSL displaced 2.0% and 29.3% of proteins from the droplet surface of sucrose-NaCas-SSL, respectively, when its concentration was varied from 0.01% to 0.05% thereby reducing the powder recovery from 75.5% to 30%. The addition of 0.01% Tween-80 in sucrose-NaCas solution resulted in a 48.2 ± 1.5% reduction in powder recovery and at 0.05% concentration, it displaced a substantial amount of NaCas from the droplet surface and no powder was recovered. These phenomena are explained on the basis of surface-glass transition temperature, dynamic surface tension, nature of surfactants and glass transition temperature of sugars used. X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy results showed that the powders of sucrose-NaCas, sucrose-NaCas with 0.01% SSL and all powders of fructose were amorphous. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Surface protein coverage and its implications on spray-drying of model sugar-rich foods: Solubility, powder production and characterisation
- Authors: Jayasundera, Mithila , Adhikari, Benu , Howes, Tony , Aldred, Peter
- Date: 2011
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Food Chemistry Vol. 128, no. 4 (2011), p. 1003-1016
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: We have investigated the amount of protein required to produce amorphous sugar powders through spray-drying. Pea protein isolate was used as a model plant protein and sodium caseinate was used as a model dairy protein. Powder recovery in a laboratory spray dryer was used as a measure of the ease of spray drying for a given formulation. More than 80% of amorphous sucrose and fructose was produced with the addition of sodium caseinate, while the pea protein isolate was able to produce only recoveries of less than 50% of amorphous sucrose. Sensitivity of low molecular weight surfactants has been demonstrated using both ionic (sodium stearoyl lactylate) and non-ionic (polysorbate-80) surfactants. Spray-dried powders were subjected to physico-chemical characterisation and dissolution experiments. The maximum solubility of all powders was obtained after 5 min of dissolution. The solubility of the sodium caseinate increased by 6-7% in the presence of fructose and low molecular weight surfactants. The solubility of the amorphous powders of sucrose-pea protein isolate was found to be lower than amorphous powders of sucrose-sodium caseinate and fructose-sodium caseinate. The addition of sucrose in water increased the solubility of the pea protein isolate from 16.84% to more than 83%. The non-ionic surfactant (Tween-80) has reduced the solubility of sucrose-pea protein isolate-Tween-80 powders significantly (p < 0.05) compared to those of sucrose-pea protein isolate-sodium stearoyl lactylate powders. The solubility of sucrose-sodium caseinate powders was comparable to that of pure sodium caseinate, indicating that addition of sucrose into 0.13% sodium caseinate does not have any significant effect on the solubility of this protein at this concentration. © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.