A trial of e-simulation of sudden patient deterioration (FIRST2ACT WEB
- Bogossian, Fiona, Cooper, Simon J., Cant, Robyn, Porter, Joanne, Forbes, Helen, McKenna, Lisa, Kinsman, Leigh, Endacott, Ruth, Devries, Brett, Philips, Nicole, Bucknall, Tracey, Young, Susan, Kain, Victoria
- Authors: Bogossian, Fiona , Cooper, Simon J. , Cant, Robyn , Porter, Joanne , Forbes, Helen , McKenna, Lisa , Kinsman, Leigh , Endacott, Ruth , Devries, Brett , Philips, Nicole , Bucknall, Tracey , Young, Susan , Kain, Victoria
- Date: 2015
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Nurse Education Today Vol. 35, no. 10 (2015), p. e36-e42
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: High-fidelity simulation pedagogy is of increasing importance in health professional education; however, face-to-face simulation programs are resource intensive and impractical to implement across large numbers of students. Objectives: To investigate undergraduate nursing students' theoretical and applied learning in response to the e-simulation program-FIRST2ACT WEBTM, and explore predictors of virtual clinical performance. Design and setting: Multi-center trial of FIRST2ACT WEBTM accessible to students in five Australian universities and colleges, across 8 campuses. Participants: A population of 489 final-year nursing students in programs of study leading to license to practice. Methods: Participants proceeded through three phases: (i) pre-simulation-briefing and assessment of clinical knowledge and experience; (ii) e-simulation-three interactive e-simulation clinical scenarios which included video recordings of patients with deteriorating conditions, interactive clinical tasks, pop up responses to tasks, and timed performance; and (iii) post-simulation feedback and evaluation.Descriptive statistics were followed by bivariate analysis to detect any associations, which were further tested using standard regression analysis. Results: Of 409 students who commenced the program (83% response rate), 367 undergraduate nursing students completed the web-based program in its entirety, yielding a completion rate of 89.7%; 38.1% of students achieved passing clinical performance across three scenarios, and the proportion achieving passing clinical knowledge increased from 78.15% pre-simulation to 91.6% post-simulation.Knowledge was the main independent predictor of clinical performance in responding to a virtual deteriorating patient R2=0.090, F(7, 352)=4.962, p<0.001. Discussion: The use of web-based technology allows simulation activities to be accessible to a large number of participants and completion rates indicate that 'Net Generation' nursing students were highly engaged with this mode of learning. Conclusion: The web-based e-simulation program FIRST2ACTTM effectively enhanced knowledge, virtual clinical performance, and self-assessed knowledge, skills, confidence, and competence in final-year nursing students. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd.
- Kinsman, Leigh, Cooper, Simon J., Cant, Robyn, Kim, Jeong-Ah, Chung, Catherine
- Authors: Kinsman, Leigh , Cooper, Simon J. , Cant, Robyn , Kim, Jeong-Ah , Chung, Catherine
- Date: 2021
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Nurse Education Today Vol. 102, no. (2021), p.
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: Nurses' response to patient deterioration in acute hospital wards is a priority issue. Simulation education programs improve nurses' knowledge and confidence, but the translation into better care is largely unknown for both web based (WB) and face to face (F2F) simulation programs. Aim: To measure the impact of simulation education on nurses' response to patient deterioration in acute medical ward settings, and to compare the impact of WB and F2F versions. Design: An interrupted time series, non-randomised trial across four medical wards in Victoria, Australia. Wards were allocated to either web-based or face-to-face versions of the same simulation program, FIRST2ACT. Interrupted time series measurement for six fortnights both before and after the intervention were used to measure and compare responses to deterioration. Responses to patient deterioration were extracted from medical records and grouped into outcomes for escalation (e.g. initiation of clinical review), assessment and observation (e.g. increased recording of vital signs, conscious state and pain scores) and clinical interventions (e.g. oxygen administration). Results: 126 nurses (89%) participated across the four wards. 946 patient records (506 in the F2F; 440 in the WB group) were included in analyses. There were significant and sustained improvements between pre and post samples in outcomes for escalation (13.0% to 28.8%; p = 0.000) and assessment and observation (conscious state recorded increased from 91.1% to 100%; p = 0.000, and pain score recorded increased from 97.8% to 99.8%; p = 0.000). There were no differences between the web-based and face-to-face groups except in appropriate oxygen application which increased by 7.7% in the F2F group and decreased by 11.8% in the WB group (p = 0.046). Conclusions: There was a significant improvement in nurses' response to patient deterioration following both versions of simulation, indicating that both have a role to play in supporting nurses' response to patient deterioration. © 2021. *Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 5 including Federation University Australia affiliate “Simon Cooper, Robyn Cant, Jeong-Ah Kim, Catherine Chung” is provided in this record**
- Description: Background: Nurses' response to patient deterioration in acute hospital wards is a priority issue. Simulation education programs improve nurses' knowledge and confidence, but the translation into better care is largely unknown for both web based (WB) and face to face (F2F) simulation programs. Aim: To measure the impact of simulation education on nurses' response to patient deterioration in acute medical ward settings, and to compare the impact of WB and F2F versions. Design: An interrupted time series, non-randomised trial across four medical wards in Victoria, Australia. Wards were allocated to either web-based or face-to-face versions of the same simulation program, FIRST2ACT. Interrupted time series measurement for six fortnights both before and after the intervention were used to measure and compare responses to deterioration. Responses to patient deterioration were extracted from medical records and grouped into outcomes for escalation (e.g. initiation of clinical review), assessment and observation (e.g. increased recording of vital signs, conscious state and pain scores) and clinical interventions (e.g. oxygen administration). Results: 126 nurses (89%) participated across the four wards. 946 patient records (506 in the F2F; 440 in the WB group) were included in analyses. There were significant and sustained improvements between pre and post samples in outcomes for escalation (13.0% to 28.8%; p = 0.000) and assessment and observation (conscious state recorded increased from 91.1% to 100%; p = 0.000, and pain score recorded increased from 97.8% to 99.8%; p = 0.000). There were no differences between the web-based and face-to-face groups except in appropriate oxygen application which increased by 7.7% in the F2F group and decreased by 11.8% in the WB group (p = 0.046). Conclusions: There was a significant improvement in nurses' response to patient deterioration following both versions of simulation, indicating that both have a role to play in supporting nurses' response to patient deterioration. © 2021. *Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 5 including Federation University Australia affiliate “Simon Cooper” is provided in this record**
- Chung, Catherine, Cooper, Simon J., Cant, Robyn, Connell, Cliff, McKay, Angela, Kinsman, Leigh, Gazula, Swapnali, Boyle, Jayne, Cameron, Amanda, Cash, Penelope, Evans, Lisa, Kim, Jeong-Ah, Masud, Rana, McInnes, Denise, Norman, Lisa, Penz, Erika, Rotter, Thomas, Tanti, Erin, Breakspear, Tom
- Authors: Chung, Catherine , Cooper, Simon J. , Cant, Robyn , Connell, Cliff , McKay, Angela , Kinsman, Leigh , Gazula, Swapnali , Boyle, Jayne , Cameron, Amanda , Cash, Penelope , Evans, Lisa , Kim, Jeong-Ah , Masud, Rana , McInnes, Denise , Norman, Lisa , Penz, Erika , Rotter, Thomas , Tanti, Erin , Breakspear, Tom
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Nurse Education Today Vol. 64, no. (2018), p. 93-98
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: There are international concerns relating to the management of patient deterioration. The “failure to rescue” literature identifies that nursing staff miss cues of deterioration and often fail to call for assistance. Simulation-based educational approaches may improve nurses’ recognition and management of patient deterioration. Objectives: To investigate the educational impact of the First2Act web-based (WB) and face-to-face (F2F) simulation programs. Design & Setting: A mixed methods interventional cohort trial with nursing staff from four Australian hospitals. Participants: Nursing staff working in four public and private hospital medical wards in the State of Victoria. Methods: In 2016, ward nursing staff (n = 74) from a public and private hospital completed three F2F laboratory-based team simulations with a patient actor in teams of three. 56 nursing staff from another public and private hospital individually completed a three-scenario WB simulation program (First2ActWeb) [A 91% participation rate]. Validated tools were used to measure knowledge (multi-choice questionnaire), competence (check-list of actions) and confidence (self-rated) before and after the intervention. Results: Both WB and F2F participants’ knowledge, competence and confidence increased significantly after training (p ≤0.001). Skill performance for the WB group increased significantly from 61% to 74% (p ≤ 0.05) and correlated significantly with post-test knowledge (p = 0.014). No change was seen in the F2F groups’ performance scores. Course evaluations were positive with median ratings of 4/5 (WB) and 5/5 (F2F). The F2F program received significantly more positive evaluations than the WB program (p < 0.05), particularly with regard to quality of feedback. Conclusion: WB and F2F simulation are effective education strategies with both programs demonstrating positive learning outcomes. WB programs increase ease of access to training whilst F2F enable the development of tactile hands on skills and teamwork. A combined blended learning education strategy is recommended to enhance competence and patient safety. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »