Comparison of physical activity in small-sided basketball games versus full-sided games
- Authors: McCormick, Brian , Hannon, James , Newton, Maria , Shultz, Barry , Miller, Nicole , Young, Warren
- Date: 2012
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching Vol. 7, no. 4 (2012), p. 689-697
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Organized youth sports leagues attempt to meet many goals. Three primary needs for a youth sports league are to meet the participants' desires, provide quality learning experiences, and develop the competencies needed for continued participation. Possessing the ball, shooting more, and being more involved with a team's offense lead to more enjoyment and feelings of competence. Therefore, increasing the involvement of each player through more ball contacts should be a goal of youth sports leagues. Twelve male basketball players (age=15) from one high-school basketball team participated in this study. This study used paired t-tests to examine the differences between three-on-three basketball games and five-on-five basketball games that lasted for eight minutes in terms of average heart rate, moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity, vigorous intensity activity, and ball contacts. There were no significant differences between average heart rate, moderate-to-vigorous intensity activity, or vigorous intensity activity in the two conditions, but there were significantly more ball contacts on average in the three-on-three games. These results suggest that three-on-three leagues may be an appropriate sport for the initial exposure to basketball for youth players.
- Description: 2003010574
Agility and change-of-direction speed are independent skills: Implications for training for agility in invasion sports
- Authors: Young, Warren , Dawson, Brian , Henry, Greg
- Date: 2015
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching Vol. 10, no. 1 (2015), p. 159-169
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: This review explores the differences between agility in invasion sports (defined as including reactive decision-making) and change-of-direction speed (CODS), and highlights the implications for training. Correlations between agility tests and CODS tests indicate that they represent independent skills. Agility tests discriminate higher-from lower-standard athletes better than CODS tests, indicating that the cognitive element of agility is important to performance. Training studies have shown that the development of strength qualities can transfer to gains in CODS, but this has never been shown for agility. There is some evidence that the importance of physical qualities is greater for CODS than for agility. It was concluded that the reactive element should be included in agility training, testing and research. While there appears to be no research evidence for the benefits of strength and power training, there is some support for the use of small-sided games for improving agility.