Estimating visual quality, a component of culturally-associated ecosystem services in palaeo-lake environments
- Chhetri, Prem, Kattel, Giri, Dong, Xuhui, Yang, Xiangdong, Min, Xu
- Authors: Chhetri, Prem , Kattel, Giri , Dong, Xuhui , Yang, Xiangdong , Min, Xu
- Date: 2014
- Type: Text , Conference paper
- Relation: Symposium on Australia-China Wetland Network Research Partnership; Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology Chinese Academy of Sciences (NIGLAS) Nanjing, China; 23rd-28th December 2014 p. 23-26
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Evaluation of visual quality is essentially a multi-dimensional and multi-sensory experience of landscape assessment. Visual quality refers to the character, condition and quality of lakes/wetlands. It involves perceiving, preferring and valuing the visual quality by the public. Visual quality is an outcome of the perceptual, cognitive and emotional processes in response to visual stimuli of a lake environment. Visual quality therefore is dependent upon the perceptual and structural aspects of perceived scenes of wetlands. Visual assessment, an evaluating process of gaining non-material or intangible benefits by people from ecosystems, through spiritual enrichment, cognitive development, self-reflection, recreation, and aesthetic experiences, has now become one of significant research areas under cultural components of ecosystem services. Public perception in such studies is composed from both the objective and subjective elements of human–landscape interactions. However, it is still a matter of debate whether subjective–objective realities are dichotomous or supplementary to enhancing the quality of human experiences in natural settings. In fact, much research considers them as inseparable and integral parts of landscape perception, despite the tendency for disintegrating landscapes into their constituent components. There is a fundamental theoretical divergence of opinions over the question whether a landscape has an intrinsic or ‘objective’ beauty, which may be in some ways measurable or comparable, or whether beauty is a value that can be only attributed subjectively to an area or a specific landscape.
- Authors: Chhetri, Prem , Kattel, Giri , Dong, Xuhui , Yang, Xiangdong , Min, Xu
- Date: 2014
- Type: Text , Conference paper
- Relation: Symposium on Australia-China Wetland Network Research Partnership; Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology Chinese Academy of Sciences (NIGLAS) Nanjing, China; 23rd-28th December 2014 p. 23-26
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Evaluation of visual quality is essentially a multi-dimensional and multi-sensory experience of landscape assessment. Visual quality refers to the character, condition and quality of lakes/wetlands. It involves perceiving, preferring and valuing the visual quality by the public. Visual quality is an outcome of the perceptual, cognitive and emotional processes in response to visual stimuli of a lake environment. Visual quality therefore is dependent upon the perceptual and structural aspects of perceived scenes of wetlands. Visual assessment, an evaluating process of gaining non-material or intangible benefits by people from ecosystems, through spiritual enrichment, cognitive development, self-reflection, recreation, and aesthetic experiences, has now become one of significant research areas under cultural components of ecosystem services. Public perception in such studies is composed from both the objective and subjective elements of human–landscape interactions. However, it is still a matter of debate whether subjective–objective realities are dichotomous or supplementary to enhancing the quality of human experiences in natural settings. In fact, much research considers them as inseparable and integral parts of landscape perception, despite the tendency for disintegrating landscapes into their constituent components. There is a fundamental theoretical divergence of opinions over the question whether a landscape has an intrinsic or ‘objective’ beauty, which may be in some ways measurable or comparable, or whether beauty is a value that can be only attributed subjectively to an area or a specific landscape.
Cladoceran-inferred ecological and hydrological changes of two floodplain wetlands in two large river systems, the Murray (Australia) and Yangtze Rivers (China)
- Kattel, Giri, Dong, Xuhui, Yang, Xiangdong
- Authors: Kattel, Giri , Dong, Xuhui , Yang, Xiangdong
- Date: 2014
- Type: Text , Conference paper
- Relation: Symposium on Australia-China Wetland Network Research Partnership; Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology Chinese Academy of Sciences (NIGLAS) Nanjing, China; 23rd-28th December 2014 p. 42-49
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: The landscapes of two of the world’s large river basins, the Murray and Yangtze Rivers of Australia and China, have been intensively developed for the provision of food and water resources. Long term archives of change, reveal that man-made infrastructures in the river and catchment modifications for agricultural and industrial developments have reduced the resilience of wetlands ecosystem structure and functions in recent decades. The river regulations imposed during the 20th centuries in the Murray and Yangtze Rivers have transformed hydrology and ecology of the river and associated wetlands. High resolution, subfossil cladoceran assemblages retrieved from Kings Billabong and Zhangdu Lake of the Murray and Yangtze Rivers, have strongly responded to human disturbances in the past. Ratios of littoral to planktonic (L:P) assemblages of subfossil cladocerans and the number of ephippial remains in Kings Billabong indicated the shift in hydrology and ecology of Kings Billabong, and ecological stress as a result of changes in naturally occurring dry-wet cycles following river regulation (1927 AD). Similarly, the subfossil cladoceran assemblages and their ephippia in Zhangdu Lake also reflected the impacts of the construction of the Three Gorges Dam (1954) in the Yangtze River on hydrology and ecology of the wetland.
- Authors: Kattel, Giri , Dong, Xuhui , Yang, Xiangdong
- Date: 2014
- Type: Text , Conference paper
- Relation: Symposium on Australia-China Wetland Network Research Partnership; Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology Chinese Academy of Sciences (NIGLAS) Nanjing, China; 23rd-28th December 2014 p. 42-49
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: The landscapes of two of the world’s large river basins, the Murray and Yangtze Rivers of Australia and China, have been intensively developed for the provision of food and water resources. Long term archives of change, reveal that man-made infrastructures in the river and catchment modifications for agricultural and industrial developments have reduced the resilience of wetlands ecosystem structure and functions in recent decades. The river regulations imposed during the 20th centuries in the Murray and Yangtze Rivers have transformed hydrology and ecology of the river and associated wetlands. High resolution, subfossil cladoceran assemblages retrieved from Kings Billabong and Zhangdu Lake of the Murray and Yangtze Rivers, have strongly responded to human disturbances in the past. Ratios of littoral to planktonic (L:P) assemblages of subfossil cladocerans and the number of ephippial remains in Kings Billabong indicated the shift in hydrology and ecology of Kings Billabong, and ecological stress as a result of changes in naturally occurring dry-wet cycles following river regulation (1927 AD). Similarly, the subfossil cladoceran assemblages and their ephippia in Zhangdu Lake also reflected the impacts of the construction of the Three Gorges Dam (1954) in the Yangtze River on hydrology and ecology of the wetland.
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »