Your selections:

17Baca, Martin
15Lin, Yuqing
14Sugeng, Kiki Ariyanti
13Ryan, Joe
9Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo
7Balbuena, Camino
6Baskoro, Edy
5Slamin,
4Dafik
4Nguyen, Minh Hoang
3Cholily, Yus Mochamad
3Gimbert, Joan
3Marcote, Xavier
3Simanjuntak, Rinovia
3Tuga, Mauritsius
2Barker, Ewan
2Delorme, Charles
2Feria-Purón, Ramiro
2Jendrol, Stanislav

Show More

Show Less

460101 Pure Mathematics
14Graph theory
80802 Computation Theory and Mathematics
8Antimagic labeling
7Degree/diameter problem
7Moore bound
50103 Numerical and Computational Mathematics
5Connectivity
5Numerical methods
4Number theory
4Set theory
4Theorem proving
308 Information and Computing Sciences
3Bipartite Moore graphs
3Defect
3Diameter
3Graph labeling
3Integer programming
3Moore graphs
3Problem solving

Show More

Show Less

Format Type

On large bipartite graphs of diameter 3

- Feria-Purón, Ramiro, Miller, Mirka, Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo

**Authors:**Feria-Purón, Ramiro , Miller, Mirka , Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo**Date:**2013**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Discrete Mathematics Vol. 313, no. 4 (2013), p. 381-390**Relation:**http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP110102011**Full Text:****Reviewed:****Description:**We consider the bipartite version of the degree/diameter problem, namely, given natural numbers dâ‰¥2 and Dâ‰¥2, find the maximum number N b(d,D) of vertices in a bipartite graph of maximum degree d and diameter D. In this context, the bipartite Moore bound Mb(d,D) represents a general upper bound for Nb(d,D). Bipartite graphs of order Mb(d,D) are very rare, and determining Nb(d,D) still remains an open problem for most (d,D) pairs. This paper is a follow-up of our earlier paper (Feria-PurÃ³n and Pineda-Villavicencio, 2012 [5]), where a study on bipartite (d,D,-4)-graphs (that is, bipartite graphs of order M b(d,D)-4) was carried out. Here we first present some structural properties of bipartite (d,3,-4)-graphs, and later prove that there are no bipartite (7,3,-4)-graphs. This result implies that the known bipartite (7,3,-6)-graph is optimal, and therefore Nb(7,3)=80. We dub this graph the Hafner-Loz graph after its first discoverers Paul Hafner and Eyal Loz. The approach here presented also provides a proof of the uniqueness of the known bipartite (5,3,-4)-graph, and the non-existence of bipartite (6,3,-4)-graphs. In addition, we discover at least one new largest known bipartite-and also vertex-transitive-graph of degree 11, diameter 3 and order 190, a result which improves by four vertices the previous lower bound for Nb(11,3). © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.**Description:**2003011037

**Authors:**Feria-Purón, Ramiro , Miller, Mirka , Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo**Date:**2013**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Discrete Mathematics Vol. 313, no. 4 (2013), p. 381-390**Relation:**http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP110102011**Full Text:****Reviewed:****Description:**We consider the bipartite version of the degree/diameter problem, namely, given natural numbers dâ‰¥2 and Dâ‰¥2, find the maximum number N b(d,D) of vertices in a bipartite graph of maximum degree d and diameter D. In this context, the bipartite Moore bound Mb(d,D) represents a general upper bound for Nb(d,D). Bipartite graphs of order Mb(d,D) are very rare, and determining Nb(d,D) still remains an open problem for most (d,D) pairs. This paper is a follow-up of our earlier paper (Feria-PurÃ³n and Pineda-Villavicencio, 2012 [5]), where a study on bipartite (d,D,-4)-graphs (that is, bipartite graphs of order M b(d,D)-4) was carried out. Here we first present some structural properties of bipartite (d,3,-4)-graphs, and later prove that there are no bipartite (7,3,-4)-graphs. This result implies that the known bipartite (7,3,-6)-graph is optimal, and therefore Nb(7,3)=80. We dub this graph the Hafner-Loz graph after its first discoverers Paul Hafner and Eyal Loz. The approach here presented also provides a proof of the uniqueness of the known bipartite (5,3,-4)-graph, and the non-existence of bipartite (6,3,-4)-graphs. In addition, we discover at least one new largest known bipartite-and also vertex-transitive-graph of degree 11, diameter 3 and order 190, a result which improves by four vertices the previous lower bound for Nb(11,3). © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.**Description:**2003011037

On graphs of defect at most 2

- Feria-Purón, Ramiro, Miller, Mirka, Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo

**Authors:**Feria-Purón, Ramiro , Miller, Mirka , Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo**Date:**2011**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Discrete Applied Mathematics Vol. 159, no. 13 (2011), p. 1331-1344**Full Text:****Reviewed:****Description:**In this paper we consider the degree/diameter problem, namely, given natural numbers Î”<2 and D<1, find the maximum number N(Î”,D) of vertices in a graph of maximum degree Î” and diameter D. In this context, the Moore bound M(Î”,D) represents an upper bound for N(Î”,D). Graphs of maximum degree Î”, diameter D and order M(Î”,D), called Moore graphs, have turned out to be very rare. Therefore, it is very interesting to investigate graphs of maximum degree Î”<2, diameter D<1 and order M(Î”,D)- with small >0, that is, (Î”,D,-)-graphs. The parameter is called the defect. Graphs of defect 1 exist only for Î”=2. When >1, (Î”,D,-)-graphs represent a wide unexplored area. This paper focuses on graphs of defect 2. Building on the approaches developed in Feria-PurÃ³n and Pineda-Villavicencio (2010) [11] we obtain several new important results on this family of graphs. First, we prove that the girth of a (Î”,D,-2)-graph with Î”<4 and D<4 is 2D. Second, and most important, we prove the non-existence of (Î”,D,-2)-graphs with even Î”<4 and D<4; this outcome, together with a proof on the non-existence of (4,3,-2)-graphs (also provided in the paper), allows us to complete the catalogue of (4,D,-)-graphs with D<2 and 0â‰¤â‰¤2. Such a catalogue is only the second census of (Î”,D,-2)-graphs known at present, the first being that of (3,D,-)-graphs with D<2 and 0â‰¤â‰¤2 JÃ¸rgensen (1992) [14]. Other results of this paper include necessary conditions for the existence of (Î”,D,-2)-graphs with odd Î”<5 and D<4, and the non-existence of (Î”,D,-2)-graphs with odd Î”<5 and D<5 such that Î”â‰¡0,2(modD). Finally, we conjecture that there are no (Î”,D,-2)-graphs with Î”<4 and D<4, and comment on some implications of our results for the upper bounds of N(Î”,D). Â© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

**Authors:**Feria-Purón, Ramiro , Miller, Mirka , Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo**Date:**2011**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Discrete Applied Mathematics Vol. 159, no. 13 (2011), p. 1331-1344**Full Text:****Reviewed:****Description:**In this paper we consider the degree/diameter problem, namely, given natural numbers Î”<2 and D<1, find the maximum number N(Î”,D) of vertices in a graph of maximum degree Î” and diameter D. In this context, the Moore bound M(Î”,D) represents an upper bound for N(Î”,D). Graphs of maximum degree Î”, diameter D and order M(Î”,D), called Moore graphs, have turned out to be very rare. Therefore, it is very interesting to investigate graphs of maximum degree Î”<2, diameter D<1 and order M(Î”,D)- with small >0, that is, (Î”,D,-)-graphs. The parameter is called the defect. Graphs of defect 1 exist only for Î”=2. When >1, (Î”,D,-)-graphs represent a wide unexplored area. This paper focuses on graphs of defect 2. Building on the approaches developed in Feria-PurÃ³n and Pineda-Villavicencio (2010) [11] we obtain several new important results on this family of graphs. First, we prove that the girth of a (Î”,D,-2)-graph with Î”<4 and D<4 is 2D. Second, and most important, we prove the non-existence of (Î”,D,-2)-graphs with even Î”<4 and D<4; this outcome, together with a proof on the non-existence of (4,3,-2)-graphs (also provided in the paper), allows us to complete the catalogue of (4,D,-)-graphs with D<2 and 0â‰¤â‰¤2. Such a catalogue is only the second census of (Î”,D,-2)-graphs known at present, the first being that of (3,D,-)-graphs with D<2 and 0â‰¤â‰¤2 JÃ¸rgensen (1992) [14]. Other results of this paper include necessary conditions for the existence of (Î”,D,-2)-graphs with odd Î”<5 and D<4, and the non-existence of (Î”,D,-2)-graphs with odd Î”<5 and D<5 such that Î”â‰¡0,2(modD). Finally, we conjecture that there are no (Î”,D,-2)-graphs with Î”<4 and D<4, and comment on some implications of our results for the upper bounds of N(Î”,D). Â© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Super edge-antimagic total labelings of mKn,n,n

- Dafik, Miller, Mirka, Ryan, Joe, Baca, Martin

**Authors:**Dafik , Miller, Mirka , Ryan, Joe , Baca, Martin**Date:**2011**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Ars Combinatoria Vol. 101, no. (2011), p. 97-107**Full Text:**false**Reviewed:****Description:**An (a, d)-edge-antimagic total labeling on (p, q)-graph G is a one-to-one map f from V(G) ∪ E(G) onto the integers 1,2,...,p + q with the property that the edge-weights, w(uv) = f(u)+f(v)+f(uv) where uv Îµ E(G), form an arithmetic progression starting from a and having common difference d. Such a labeling is called super if the smallest possible labels appear on the vertices. In this paper, we investigate the existence of super (a, d)-edge-antimagic total labeling of disjoint union of multiple copies of complete tripartite graph and disjoint union of stars.**Description:**An (a, d)-edge-antimagic total labeling on (p, q)-graph G is a one-to-one map f from V(G) ∪ E(G) onto the integers 1,2,...,p + q with the property that the edge-weights, w(uv) = f(u)+f(v)+f(uv) where uv Îµ E(G), form an arithmetic progression starting from a and having common difference d. Such a labeling is called super if the smallest possible labels appear on the vertices. In this paper, we investigate the existence of super (a, d)-edge-antimagic total labeling of disjoint union of multiple copies of complete tripartite graph and disjoint union of stars.

Antimagic labeling of disjoint union of s-crowns

- Baca, Martin, Dafik, Miller, Mirka, Ryan, Joe

**Authors:**Baca, Martin , Dafik , Miller, Mirka , Ryan, Joe**Date:**2009**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Utilitas Mathematica Vol. 79, no. (2009), p. 193-205**Full Text:**false**Reviewed:****Description:**A graph G is called (a, d)-edge-antimagic total if it admits a labeling of the vertices and edges by pairwise distinct integers of 1,2,..., |V(G)| + |E(G)| such that the edge-weights, w(uÏ…) = f(u) + f(Ï…) + f(uÏ…), uv âˆˆ E(G), form an arithmetic sequence with the first term a and common difference d. Such a graph G is called super if the smallest possible labels appear on the vertices. A construction of super (a, d)-edge-antimagic total labelings of some disconnected graphs are described.

Complete catalogue of graphs of maximum degree 3 and defect at most 4

- Miller, Mirka, Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo

**Authors:**Miller, Mirka , Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo**Date:**2009**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Discrete Applied Mathematics Vol. 157, no. 13 (2009), p. 2983-2996**Full Text:****Reviewed:****Description:**We consider graphs of maximum degree 3, diameter D≥2 and at most 4 vertices less than the Moore bound M3,D, that is, (3,D,−)-graphs for ≤4. We prove the non-existence of (3,D,−4)-graphs for D≥5, completing in this way the catalogue of (3,D,−)-graphs with D≥2 and ≤4. Our results also give an improvement to the upper bound on the largest possible number N3,D of vertices in a graph of maximum degree 3 and diameter D, so that N3,D≤M3,D−6 for D≥5. Copyright Elsevier.

**Authors:**Miller, Mirka , Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo**Date:**2009**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Discrete Applied Mathematics Vol. 157, no. 13 (2009), p. 2983-2996**Full Text:****Reviewed:****Description:**We consider graphs of maximum degree 3, diameter D≥2 and at most 4 vertices less than the Moore bound M3,D, that is, (3,D,−)-graphs for ≤4. We prove the non-existence of (3,D,−4)-graphs for D≥5, completing in this way the catalogue of (3,D,−)-graphs with D≥2 and ≤4. Our results also give an improvement to the upper bound on the largest possible number N3,D of vertices in a graph of maximum degree 3 and diameter D, so that N3,D≤M3,D−6 for D≥5. Copyright Elsevier.

New largest known graphs of diameter 6

- Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo, Gómez, José, Miller, Mirka, Pérez-Rosés, Hebert

**Authors:**Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo , Gómez, José , Miller, Mirka , Pérez-Rosés, Hebert**Date:**2009**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Networks Vol. 53, no. 4 (2009), p. 315-328**Full Text:****Reviewed:****Description:**In the pursuit of obtaining largest graphs of given maximum degree**Description:**2003007890

**Authors:**Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo , Gómez, José , Miller, Mirka , Pérez-Rosés, Hebert**Date:**2009**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Networks Vol. 53, no. 4 (2009), p. 315-328**Full Text:****Reviewed:****Description:**In the pursuit of obtaining largest graphs of given maximum degree**Description:**2003007890

On bipartite graphs of defect 2

- Delorme, Charles, Jorgensen, Leif, Miller, Mirka, Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo

**Authors:**Delorme, Charles , Jorgensen, Leif , Miller, Mirka , Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo**Date:**2009**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**European Journal of Combinatorics Vol. 30, no. 4 (2009), p. 798-808**Full Text:****Reviewed:****Description:**It is known that the Moore bipartite bound provides an upper bound on the order of a connected bipartite graph. In this paper we deal with bipartite graphs of maximum degree

**Authors:**Delorme, Charles , Jorgensen, Leif , Miller, Mirka , Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo**Date:**2009**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**European Journal of Combinatorics Vol. 30, no. 4 (2009), p. 798-808**Full Text:****Reviewed:****Description:**It is known that the Moore bipartite bound provides an upper bound on the order of a connected bipartite graph. In this paper we deal with bipartite graphs of maximum degree

On bipartite graphs of diameter 3 and defect 2

- Delorme, Charles, Jorgensen, Leif, Miller, Mirka, Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo

**Authors:**Delorme, Charles , Jorgensen, Leif , Miller, Mirka , Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo**Date:**2009**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Journal of Graph Theory Vol. 61, no. 4 (2009), p. 271-288**Full Text:****Reviewed:****Description:**We consider bipartite graphs of degree A<2, diameter D = 3, and defect 2 (having 2 vertices less than the bipartite Moore bound). Such graphs are called bipartite (â–³,3, -2) -graphs. We prove the uniqueness of the known bipartite (3, 3, -2) -graph and bipartite (4, 3, -2)-graph. We also prove several necessary conditions for the existence of bipartite (â–³,3, -2) - graphs. The most general of these conditions is that either â–³ or â–³-2 must be a perfect square. Furthermore, in some cases for which the condition holds, in particular, when â–³ = 6 and â–³ = 9, we prove the non-existence of the corresponding bipartite (â–³,3,-2)-graphs, thus establishing that there are no bipartite (â–³,3, -2)-graphs, for 5

**Authors:**Delorme, Charles , Jorgensen, Leif , Miller, Mirka , Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo**Date:**2009**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Journal of Graph Theory Vol. 61, no. 4 (2009), p. 271-288**Full Text:****Reviewed:****Description:**We consider bipartite graphs of degree A<2, diameter D = 3, and defect 2 (having 2 vertices less than the bipartite Moore bound). Such graphs are called bipartite (â–³,3, -2) -graphs. We prove the uniqueness of the known bipartite (3, 3, -2) -graph and bipartite (4, 3, -2)-graph. We also prove several necessary conditions for the existence of bipartite (â–³,3, -2) - graphs. The most general of these conditions is that either â–³ or â–³-2 must be a perfect square. Furthermore, in some cases for which the condition holds, in particular, when â–³ = 6 and â–³ = 9, we prove the non-existence of the corresponding bipartite (â–³,3,-2)-graphs, thus establishing that there are no bipartite (â–³,3, -2)-graphs, for 5

On the nonexistence of graphs of diameter 2 and defect 2

- Miller, Mirka, Nguyen, Minh Hoang, Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo

**Authors:**Miller, Mirka , Nguyen, Minh Hoang , Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo**Date:**2009**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**The Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing Vol. 71, no. (2009), p. 5-20**Full Text:**false**Reviewed:****Description:**In 1960, Hoffman and Singleton investigated the existence of Moore graphs of diameter 2 (graphs of maximum degree d and d² + 1 vertices), and found that such graphs exist only for d = 2; 3; 7 and possibly 57. In 1980, Erdös et al., using eigenvalue analysis, showed that, with the exception of C4, there are no graphs of diameter 2, maximum degree d and d² vertices. In this paper, we show that graphs of diameter 2, maximum degree d and d² - 1 vertices do not exist for most values of d with d ≥ 6, and conjecture that they do not exist for any d ≥ 6.**Description:**2003007893

Edge-antimagic total labeling of disjoint union of caterpillars

- Baca, Martin, Dafik, Miller, Mirka, Ryan, Joe

**Authors:**Baca, Martin , Dafik , Miller, Mirka , Ryan, Joe**Date:**2008**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Journal of combinatorial mathematics and combinatorial computing Vol. 65, no. (May 2008 2008), p. 61-70**Full Text:**false**Reviewed:**

Enumerations of vertex orders of almost Moore digraphs with selfrepeats

- Baskoro, Edy, Cholily, Yus Mochamad, Miller, Mirka

**Authors:**Baskoro, Edy , Cholily, Yus Mochamad , Miller, Mirka**Date:**2008**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Discrete Mathematics Vol. 308, no. 1 (2008), p. 123-128**Full Text:**false**Reviewed:****Description:**An almost Moore digraph G of degree d > 1, diameter k > 1 is a diregular digraph with the number of vertices one less than the Moore bound. If G is an almost Moore digraph, then for each vertex u ∈ V (G) there exists a vertex v ∈ V (G), called repeat of u and denoted by r (u) = v, such that there are two walks of length ≤ k from u to v. The smallest positive integer p such that the composition rp (u) = u is called the order of u. If the order of u is 1 then u is called a selfrepeat. It is known that if G is an almost Moore digraph of diameter k ≥ 3 then G contains exactly k selfrepeats or none. In this paper, we propose an exact formula for the number of all vertex orders in an almost Moore digraph G containing selfrepeats, based on the vertex orders of the out-neighbours of any selfrepeat vertex. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.**Description:**C1

Graphs of order two less than the Moore bound

- Miller, Mirka, Simanjuntak, Rinovia

**Authors:**Miller, Mirka , Simanjuntak, Rinovia**Date:**2008**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Discrete Mathematics Vol. 308, no. 13 (2008), p. 2810-2821**Full Text:**false**Reviewed:****Description:**The Moore bound for a directed graph of maximum out-degree d and diameter k is Md,k=1+d+d2++dk. It is known that digraphs of order Md,k (Moore digraphs) do not exist for d>1 and k>1. Similarly, the Moore bound for an undirected graph of maximum degree d and diameter k is . Undirected Moore graphs only exist in a small number of cases. Mixed (or partially directed) Moore graphs generalize both undirected and directed Moore graphs. In this paper, we shall show that all known mixed Moore graphs of diameter k=2 are unique and that mixed Moore graphs of diameter k3 do not exist.**Description:**C1

HSAGA and its application for the construction of near-Moore digraphs

- Tang, Jianmin, Miller, Mirka, Lin, Yuqing

**Authors:**Tang, Jianmin , Miller, Mirka , Lin, Yuqing**Date:**2008**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Journal of Discrete Algorithms Vol. 6, no. 1 (2008), p. 73-84**Full Text:**false**Reviewed:****Description:**The degree/diameter problem is to determine the largest graphs or digraphs of given maximum degree and given diameter. This paper deals with directed graphs. General upper bounds, called Moore bounds, exist for the largest possible order of such digraphs of maximum degree d and given diameter k. It is known that simulated annealing and genetic algorithm are effective techniques to identify global optimal solutions. This paper describes our attempt to build a Hybrid Simulated Annealing and Genetic Algorithm (HSAGA) that can be used to construct large digraphs. We present our new results obtained by HSAGA, as well as several related open problems. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.**Description:**C1

Moore bound for mixed networks

- Nguyen, Minh Hoang, Miller, Mirka

**Authors:**Nguyen, Minh Hoang , Miller, Mirka**Date:**2008**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Discrete Mathematics Vol. 308, no. 23 (Dec 2008), p. 5499-5503**Full Text:**false**Reviewed:****Description:**Mixed graphs contain both undirected as well as directed links between vertices and therefore are an interesting model for interconnection communication networks. In this paper, we establish the Moore bound for mixed graphs, which generalizes both the directed and the undirected Moore bound. Crown Copyright (C) 2007 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

New constructions of A-magic graphs using labeling matrices

- Sugeng, Kiki Ariyanti, Miller, Mirka

**Authors:**Sugeng, Kiki Ariyanti , Miller, Mirka**Date:**2008**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Journal of combinatorial mathematics and combinatorial computing Vol. 65, no. (May 2008), p. 147-151**Full Text:**false**Reviewed:**

On antimagic labelings of disjoint union of complete s-partite graphs

- Dafik, Miller, Mirka, Ryan, Joe, Baca, Martin

**Authors:**Dafik , Miller, Mirka , Ryan, Joe , Baca, Martin**Date:**2008**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Journal of combinatorial mathematics and combinatorial computing Vol. 65, no. (May 2008 2008), p. 41-49**Full Text:****Reviewed:****Description:**By an (a, d)-edge-antimagic total labeling of a graph G(V, E) we mean a bijective function f from V(G) u E(G) onto the set. { 1, 2, ... ,ǀV(C)ǀ+IE(G)I} such that the set of all the edge-weights, w(uv) ,.... f(u) + f(uv) + f(v), uv C E (G), is {a, a+ d, a+ 2d, . . . , a + (lE(G)I-1)d}, for two integers a > 0 and d

**Authors:**Dafik , Miller, Mirka , Ryan, Joe , Baca, Martin**Date:**2008**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Journal of combinatorial mathematics and combinatorial computing Vol. 65, no. (May 2008 2008), p. 41-49**Full Text:****Reviewed:****Description:**By an (a, d)-edge-antimagic total labeling of a graph G(V, E) we mean a bijective function f from V(G) u E(G) onto the set. { 1, 2, ... ,ǀV(C)ǀ+IE(G)I} such that the set of all the edge-weights, w(uv) ,.... f(u) + f(uv) + f(v), uv C E (G), is {a, a+ d, a+ 2d, . . . , a + (lE(G)I-1)d}, for two integers a > 0 and d

On consecutive edge magic total labeling of graphs

- Sugeng, Kiki Ariyanti, Miller, Mirka

**Authors:**Sugeng, Kiki Ariyanti , Miller, Mirka**Date:**2008**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Journal of Discrete Algorithms Vol. 6, no. 1 (2008), p. 59-65**Full Text:**false**Reviewed:****Description:**Let G = (V, E) be a finite (non-empty) graph, where V and E are the sets of vertices and edges of G. An edge magic total labeling is a bijection**Description:**C1

On graphs of maximum degree 3 and defect 4

- Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo, Miller, Mirka

**Authors:**Pineda-Villavicencio, Guillermo , Miller, Mirka**Date:**2008**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Journal of combinatorial mathematics and combinatorial computing Vol. 65, no. (May 2008), p. 25-31**Full Text:**false**Reviewed:****Description:**It is well known that apart from the Petersen graph there are no Moore graphs of degree 3. As a cubic graph must have an even number of vertices, there are no graphs of maximum degree 3 and

On the connectivity of (k, g)-cages of even girth

- Lin, Yuqing, Balbuena, Camino, Marcote, Xavier, Miller, Mirka

**Authors:**Lin, Yuqing , Balbuena, Camino , Marcote, Xavier , Miller, Mirka**Date:**2008**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Discrete Mathematics Vol. 308, no. 15 (2008), p. 3249-3256**Full Text:**false**Reviewed:****Description:**A (k,g)-cage is a k-regular graph with girth g and with the least possible number of vertices. In this paper we give a brief overview of the current results on the connectivity of (k,g)-cages and we improve the current known best lower bound on the vertex connectivity of (k,g)-cages for g even. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.**Description:**C1

- Iliopoulos, Costas, Miller, Mirka

**Authors:**Iliopoulos, Costas , Miller, Mirka**Date:**2008**Type:**Text , Journal article**Relation:**Journal of Discrete Algorithms Vol. 6, no. 1 (2008), p. 1-2**Full Text:**false**Reviewed:****Description:**C1

Are you sure you would like to clear your session, including search history and login status?