- Title
- Factor structure of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale Short Forms
- Creator
- Gomez, Rapson
- Date
- 2016
- Type
- Text; Journal article
- Identifier
- http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/HandleResolver/1959.17/100513
- Identifier
- vital:10556
- Identifier
-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.086
- Identifier
- ISSN:0191-8869
- Abstract
- The study used frequentist confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and Bayesian CFA (BCFA) (one-factor, two-factor, and bifactor models) for Peters, Sunderland, Andrews, Rapee, and Mattick's (2012) short form Social Anxiety Interaction Scale (SAIS) and Fergus, Valentiner, McGrath, Gier-Lonsway, and Kim's (2012) short form Social Phobia Scale (SPS) Short Forms. Participants (N = 200) were adults from the general community who completed the full version of SIAS and SPS measures. For the different models tested, CFA provided moderate support for the two-factor model for Peters et al.'s Short Forms. BCFA showed good support for the two-factor and bifactor models for Peters et al.'s Short Forms, with the bifactor model showing better fit. This bifactor model showed high internal consistency reliability and had a high amount of explained common variance for its general factor. The SIAS and SPS specific factors of the bifactor model showed almost negligible internal consistency reliabilities and explained common variances. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
- Publisher
- Elsevier Ltd
- Relation
- Personality and Individual Differences Vol. 96, no. (2016), p. 83-87
- Rights
- Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
- Rights
- This metadata is freely available under a CCO license
- Subject
- 1701 Psychology; 1702 Cognitive Science; Bifactor model; Factor structure; Fergus et al.'s SIAS and SPS Short Forms; Peters et al.'s SIAS and SPS Short Forms
- Reviewed
- Hits: 1061
- Visitors: 991
- Downloads: 1
Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format |
---|