Description:
Trustworthiness in an online environment is essential because individuals and organizations can easily be misled by false and malicious information receiving from untrustworthy users. Though existing methods assess users' trustworthiness by exploiting Twitter account properties, their efficacy is inadequate because of Twitter's restriction on profile and tweet size, the existence of missing or insufficient profiles, and ease to create fake accounts or relationships to pretend as trustworthy. In this paper, we present a holistic approach by exploiting ideas perceived from real-world organizations for trust estimation along with available Twitter information. Users' trustworthiness is determined by considering their credentials, recommendation from referees and the quality of the information in their Twitter accounts and tweets. We establish the feasibility of our approach analytically and further devise a multi-objective cost function for the A
Description:
Trustworthiness in an online environment is essential because individuals and organizations can easily be misled by false and malicious information receiving from untrustworthy users. Though existing methods assess users' trustworthiness by exploiting Twitter account properties, their efficacy is inadequate because of Twitter's restriction on profile and tweet size, the existence of missing or insufficient profiles, and ease to create fake accounts or relationships to pretend as trustworthy. In this paper, we present a holistic approach by exploiting ideas perceived from real-world organizations for trust estimation along with available Twitter information. Users' trustworthiness is determined by considering their credentials, recommendation from referees and the quality of the information in their Twitter accounts and tweets. We establish the feasibility of our approach analytically and further devise a multi-objective cost function for the A
Description:
The challenging but intriguing problem of modeling opinion formation dynamics in online social networks (OSNs) has attracted many researchers in recent years because the inherent complexities present in human opinion update process are yet to be clearly understood. Although the existing works adopt the distance-based homophily principle to model the neighbors' influences on the formation of an agent's opinion, they ignore several other key factors that govern the update process. Explicitly, we consider two essential aspects of the real-world opinion formation process that were not explored previously. First, we consider the predisposition of agents that leads to selective exposure to information when presented with different opinion sources. Second, we explicitly consider an agent's past interaction experience with others and how opinions encountered in the past interactions influence future opinion update process of that agent. Although the confidence level of an agent on the expressed opinion was previously used to distinguish an expert, we propose the concept of the relative credibility of the opinion sources for such distinction. For this, we take into account an agent's perceived credibility about others and the relative nature of human judgment when exposed to many opinion sources with different credibility. In addition, for the first time, the credibility of sources external to an OSN is considered in the opinion formation model proposed in this paper. We validate our model by analyzing its performance in capturing the real-world opinion formation dynamics using traces collected from an OSN, specifically Twitter. On the other hand, through simulation, various scenarios are created to observe the steady-state outcomes of the dynamics under various influences of our model parameters and network characteristics. Finally, different compelling and practical applications with social and economic values can be built based on our model.
Description:
To operate enterprise activities, a large number of queries need to be processed every day through an enterprise system. Consequently, such a system frequently faces hugely overloaded information and incurs high delay in producing query responses for big data. This is because, traditional queries are normally treated with equal importance. With the advent of big data and its use in enterprise systems and the growth of process complexity, the traditional approach of query processing is no more suitable as it does not consider semantic information and captures all data irrespective of their relevance to a business organization, which eventually increases the computational time in both big data collection and analysis. The significance level of a query can make a trade-off between query response delay and the extent of data collection and analysis. This motivates us to concentrate on determining the significance level of a query considering its importance to an enterprise system. To our knowledge, no such approach is available in the literature. To bridge this research gap, this paper, for the first time, proposes an approach to determine the significance level of a query to prioritize them with the relevance to a business organization. As business processes play key roles in any enterprise system and all business processes are not equally important, this is done by determining the semantic similarity between a query and the processes of a business organization and the importance of a business process to that organization. With a case study on an enterprise system of a retail company, the results produced by our proposed approach have shown that significance level is higher for more important queries compared to the less important ones.
Description:
Online social network (OSN) is one of the major platforms where our opinions are formed now-a-days and increasing so. Opinion formation dynamics captures the ways public opinions are formed, mainly from two different sources, (i) neighbours' opinions, (ii) external opinions from sources other than the neighbours. In this paper, we formulate an opinion formation model by considering two very important factors, that were ignored or a very little explored in the literature. First, we model the convincing power of the opinions encountered from the two sources. Second, we incorporate the experience of users' previous interactions with the two opinion sources. The problem is formulated as an agent based model where each member of an OSN is represented with an agent and their relationships with a graph. Finally through simulation, we create various scenarios, and apply our model to observe the steady state outcomes of the dynamics. This helps us to study the nature of the public opinions under various influences of our model parameters.
Description:
European Simulation and Modelling Conference 2016, ESM 2016