- Title
- Pain management of adult sedated and ventilated patients in the intensive care units : a survey with free text responses
- Creator
- Hamadeh, Samira; Lambert, Gavin; Willetts, Georgina; Garvey, Loretta
- Date
- 2024
- Type
- Text; Journal article
- Identifier
- http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/HandleResolver/1959.17/204817
- Identifier
- vital:20100
- Identifier
-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103770
- Identifier
- ISSN:0964-3397 (ISSN)
- Abstract
- Background: Pain management of sedated and ventilated patients in intensive care units lacks consistency. Objectives: To investigate nurses’ training, governance, practices, knowledge and attitudes relating to pain management in consideration of published guidelines and explore nurses’ perspectives. Methods: A survey design, using an online questionnaire with free text responses, was employed. Quantitative and qualitative data from nurses working across different hospitals were collated and saved on Qualtrics platform. Quantitative data were analysed non-parametrically and narrative responses thematically. CROSS and SRQR reporting guidelines were adhered to. Outcome measures: Demographics, training, governance, clinical practice, knowledge, and attitudes. Results/findings: 108 nurses participated with ninety-two completed surveys analysed. Analgesia was used to complete nursing tasks regardless of comfort needs (n = 49, 53.3 %). Changes in vital signs prompted opioid administration (n = 48, 52.1 %). Choice of analgesia depended on doctor's preference (n = 63, 68.5 %). Non-opioid therapy was administered before opioids (n = 42, 45.7 %). Sedatives were used to alleviate agitation(n = 50,54.3 %). No statistically significant difference in nurses’ knowledge existed between hospitals. Weak positive relationship: r = [0.081], p = [0.441] between “knowledge scores” and “years of ICU experience” and weak negative relationship r = [-0.119], p = [0.260] between “knowledge scores” and “hours of clinical practice” was detected. Lack of training, resources, policies, high patient acuity and casual employment were acknowledged barriers to pain management. Two overarching themes emerged from narrative responses: “Pain assessment, where is it?” And “Priorities of critical illness.” Conclusion: The study uncovered pain management situation and examined nurses’ demographics, training, governance, practices, knowledge and attitudes. Narrative responses highlighted barriers to pain management. Implications for clinical practice: Health organisations should provide education, institute governance and develop policies to inform pain management. Nurses’ role encompasses updating knowledge, adhering to interventions and overcoming biases. This subsequently manifests as improvement in patient outcomes. © 2024 The Author(s)
- Publisher
- Churchill Livingstone
- Relation
- Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Vol. 84, no. (2024), p.
- Rights
- All metadata describing materials held in, or linked to, the repository is freely available under a CC0 licence
- Rights
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Rights
- Copyright © 2024 The Author(s)
- Rights
- Open Access
- Subject
- 4205 Nursing; Attitudes; Guidelines; Intensive care unit; Knowledge; Pain management; Practices; Ventilated patients
- Full Text
- Reviewed
- Hits: 19
- Visitors: 17
- Downloads: 0
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details Download | SOURCE1 | Published version | 503 KB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details Download |