- Title
- Does wing morphology affect recolonization of restored farmland by ground-dwelling beetles?
- Creator
- Gibb, Heloise; Retter, Bryony; Cunningham, Saul; Barton, Philip
- Date
- 2017
- Type
- Text; Journal article
- Identifier
- http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/HandleResolver/1959.17/181503
- Identifier
- vital:15938
- Identifier
-
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12420
- Identifier
- ISBN:1061-2971 (ISSN)
- Abstract
- Revegetation of previously cleared land is widely used to increase habitat area and connectivity of remnant vegetation for biodiversity conservation. Whether new habitat attracts or supports fauna depends on the dispersal traits of those fauna as well as the structure and composition of the surrounding landscape. Here, we examined wing morphology as a key dispersal trait for beetles in a revegetated landscape and asked, first, how it was related to phylogeny (family), trophic position, and body size. Second, we asked if wing morphology of recolonizing (or persisting) beetles varied with habitat characteristics at multiple scales, from microhabitat to landscape context. Third, we examined how common winged and wingless species responded to habitat at multiple scales. We measured the wing morphology of ground-dwelling beetles from a restoration chronosequence, including paddocks, “young” revegetation (8–11 years old), “old” revegetation (14–19 years old), and fenced remnant vegetation. We found that body size and family membership were significant predictors of winglessness, with wingless species of carabids and curculionids being larger than their winged counterparts. We found no difference in the number of sites occupied by winged and wingless species, and no relationship between the wing morphology traits represented in different locations and habitat characteristics or landscape context. Furthermore, the most abundant species of both winged and wingless ground-dwelling beetles had relatively little affinity to any habitat successional stage. Thus, despite intrinsic differences in wing morphology among species of ground-dwelling beetle, we found no evidence that flight-related dispersal limitations influenced recolonization (or persistence) in this landscape. © 2016 Society for Ecological Restoration
- Publisher
- Blackwell Publishing Inc.
- Relation
- Restoration Ecology Vol. 25, no. 2 (2017), p. 234-242
- Rights
- All metadata describing materials held in, or linked to, the repository is freely available under a CC0 licence
- Rights
- Copyright © 2016 Society for Ecological Restoration
- Subject
- 31 Biological Sciences; 41 Environmental Sciences; Dispersal; Landscape; Planting; Restoration; Revegetation; Trait
- Reviewed
- Funder
- This work was supported through a CSIRO Office of the Chief Executive Postdoctoral Fellowship to H.G.
- Hits: 689
- Visitors: 666
- Downloads: 0