Will 'other effective area-based conservation measures' increase recognition and support for ICCAs?
- Jonas, Harry, Lee, Emma, Jonas, Holly, Matallana-Tobon, Clara, Wright, Kim, Nelson, Fred, Enns, Eli
- Authors: Jonas, Harry , Lee, Emma , Jonas, Holly , Matallana-Tobon, Clara , Wright, Kim , Nelson, Fred , Enns, Eli
- Date: 2017
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Parks Vol. 23, no. 2 (2017), p. 63-78
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: This paper reflects on IUCN's ongoing progress to develop technical guidance on 'other effective area-based conservation measures' (OECMs) and begins to explore under what conditions OECMs - as a new form of recognition - might make a positive contribution to territories and areas conserved by Indigenous peoples and local communities (abbreviated to 'ICCAs'). It argues that while the protected areas framework is a potentially useful means by which to recognise the biodiversity contributions of some ICCAs, it is not universally appropriate. In this context, and subject to important caveats, OECM-related frameworks offer an important opportunity to increase recognition and support for ICCAs. The paper concludes with two practical recommendations: first for the development of supplementary guidance on OECMs and ICCAs; and second, for further discussion by a wide range of interested parties on whether 'OECMs' should be referred to as 'conserved areas'.
- Authors: Jonas, Harry , Lee, Emma , Jonas, Holly , Matallana-Tobon, Clara , Wright, Kim , Nelson, Fred , Enns, Eli
- Date: 2017
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Parks Vol. 23, no. 2 (2017), p. 63-78
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: This paper reflects on IUCN's ongoing progress to develop technical guidance on 'other effective area-based conservation measures' (OECMs) and begins to explore under what conditions OECMs - as a new form of recognition - might make a positive contribution to territories and areas conserved by Indigenous peoples and local communities (abbreviated to 'ICCAs'). It argues that while the protected areas framework is a potentially useful means by which to recognise the biodiversity contributions of some ICCAs, it is not universally appropriate. In this context, and subject to important caveats, OECM-related frameworks offer an important opportunity to increase recognition and support for ICCAs. The paper concludes with two practical recommendations: first for the development of supplementary guidance on OECMs and ICCAs; and second, for further discussion by a wide range of interested parties on whether 'OECMs' should be referred to as 'conserved areas'.
Equitable and effective area‐based conservation : towards the conserved areas paradigm
- Jonas, Harry, Ahmadia, Gabby, Bingham, Heather, Briggs, Johnny, Butchart, Stuart, Cariño, Joji, Chassot, Olivier, Chaudhary, Sunita, Darling, Emily, Degemmis, Alfred, Dudley, Nigel, Fa, Julia, Fitzsimons, James, Garnett, Stephen, Geldmann, Jonas, Golden Kroner, Rachel, Gurney, Georgina, Harrington, Alexandra, Himes‐cornell, Amber, Hockings, Marc, Jonas, Holly, Jupiter, Stacy, Kingston, Naomi, Lee, Emma, Lieberman, Susan, Mangubhai, Sangeeta, Marnewick, Daniel, Matallana‐tobón, Clara, Maxwell, Sean, Nelson, Fred, Parrish, Jeffrey, Ranaivoson, Ravaka, Rao, Madhu, Santamaría, Marcela, Venter, Oscar, Visconti, Piero, Waithaka, James, Painemilla, Kristen, Watson, James, von Weizsäcker, Christine
- Authors: Jonas, Harry , Ahmadia, Gabby , Bingham, Heather , Briggs, Johnny , Butchart, Stuart , Cariño, Joji , Chassot, Olivier , Chaudhary, Sunita , Darling, Emily , Degemmis, Alfred , Dudley, Nigel , Fa, Julia , Fitzsimons, James , Garnett, Stephen , Geldmann, Jonas , Golden Kroner, Rachel , Gurney, Georgina , Harrington, Alexandra , Himes‐cornell, Amber , Hockings, Marc , Jonas, Holly , Jupiter, Stacy , Kingston, Naomi , Lee, Emma , Lieberman, Susan , Mangubhai, Sangeeta , Marnewick, Daniel , Matallana‐tobón, Clara , Maxwell, Sean , Nelson, Fred , Parrish, Jeffrey , Ranaivoson, Ravaka , Rao, Madhu , Santamaría, Marcela , Venter, Oscar , Visconti, Piero , Waithaka, James , Painemilla, Kristen , Watson, James , von Weizsäcker, Christine
- Date: 2021
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Parks Vol. 27, no. 1 (2021), p. 71-84
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: In 2018, the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) adopted a decision on protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs). It contains the definition of an OECM and related scientific and technical advice that has broadened the scope of governance authorities and areas that can be engaged and recognised in global conservation efforts. The voluntary guidance on OECMs and protected areas, also included in the decision, promotes the use of diverse, effective and equitable governance models, the integration of protected areas and OECMs into wider landscapes and seascapes, and mainstreaming of biodiversity conservation across sectors. Taken as a whole, the advice and voluntary guidance provides further clarity about the CBD Parties’ understanding of what constitutes equitable and effective area-based conservation measures within and beyond protected areas and provides standardised criteria with which to measure and report areas’ attributes and performance. This policy perspective suggests that this CBD decision represents further evidence of the evolution from the ‘new paradigm for protected areas’ to a broader ‘conserved areas paradigm’ that embodies good governance, equity and effective conservation outcomes and is inclusive of a diversity of contributions to conservation within and beyond protected areas. © 2021, IUCN - International Union for the Conservation of Nature. All rights reserved.
- Authors: Jonas, Harry , Ahmadia, Gabby , Bingham, Heather , Briggs, Johnny , Butchart, Stuart , Cariño, Joji , Chassot, Olivier , Chaudhary, Sunita , Darling, Emily , Degemmis, Alfred , Dudley, Nigel , Fa, Julia , Fitzsimons, James , Garnett, Stephen , Geldmann, Jonas , Golden Kroner, Rachel , Gurney, Georgina , Harrington, Alexandra , Himes‐cornell, Amber , Hockings, Marc , Jonas, Holly , Jupiter, Stacy , Kingston, Naomi , Lee, Emma , Lieberman, Susan , Mangubhai, Sangeeta , Marnewick, Daniel , Matallana‐tobón, Clara , Maxwell, Sean , Nelson, Fred , Parrish, Jeffrey , Ranaivoson, Ravaka , Rao, Madhu , Santamaría, Marcela , Venter, Oscar , Visconti, Piero , Waithaka, James , Painemilla, Kristen , Watson, James , von Weizsäcker, Christine
- Date: 2021
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Parks Vol. 27, no. 1 (2021), p. 71-84
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: In 2018, the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) adopted a decision on protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs). It contains the definition of an OECM and related scientific and technical advice that has broadened the scope of governance authorities and areas that can be engaged and recognised in global conservation efforts. The voluntary guidance on OECMs and protected areas, also included in the decision, promotes the use of diverse, effective and equitable governance models, the integration of protected areas and OECMs into wider landscapes and seascapes, and mainstreaming of biodiversity conservation across sectors. Taken as a whole, the advice and voluntary guidance provides further clarity about the CBD Parties’ understanding of what constitutes equitable and effective area-based conservation measures within and beyond protected areas and provides standardised criteria with which to measure and report areas’ attributes and performance. This policy perspective suggests that this CBD decision represents further evidence of the evolution from the ‘new paradigm for protected areas’ to a broader ‘conserved areas paradigm’ that embodies good governance, equity and effective conservation outcomes and is inclusive of a diversity of contributions to conservation within and beyond protected areas. © 2021, IUCN - International Union for the Conservation of Nature. All rights reserved.
Management effectiveness of wetland-protected areas
- McInnes, Rob, Gell, Peter, Finlayson, C.
- Authors: McInnes, Rob , Gell, Peter , Finlayson, C.
- Date: 2023
- Type: Text , Book chapter
- Relation: Ramsar Wetlands: Values, Assessment, Management Chapter 14 p. 357-376
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: The effective management of wetlands requires a sound policy foundation that recognises the full range of states through which a wetland may pass, the drivers of change and their periodicity, and the trajectory of present change relative to past conditions. A management plan should suit the local requirements, and be as large or complex as is required for any specific site. While the format and presentation of a management plan can vary, the process comprises six steps to implement actions to achieve the management goals, namely: Why are we here? What have we got? What are the important features? What are the important influences? What do we want? What must we do? Based on general requirements for effectiveness tracking in protected areas, a specific Ramsar Site Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool (R-METT) has been formally adopted by the Ramsar Convention. This is designed to be simple and rapid to assist site managers and to facilitate wide uptake of the approach. The evaluation questions in R-METT were designed to be easily answered by the management authority without any additional research or intense and costly data collection. © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »