Identifying complementary and alternative medicine recommendations for anxiety treatment and care : a systematic review and critical assessment of comprehensive clinical practice guidelines
- Zhao, Fei-Yi, Kennedy, Gerard, Xu, Peijie, Conduit, Russell, Wang, Yan-Mei, Zhang, Wen-Jing, Wang, Hui-Ru, Yue, Li-Ping, Huang, Yu-Ling, Wang, Yin, Xu, Yan, Fu, Qiang-Qiang, Zheng, Zhen
- Authors: Zhao, Fei-Yi , Kennedy, Gerard , Xu, Peijie , Conduit, Russell , Wang, Yan-Mei , Zhang, Wen-Jing , Wang, Hui-Ru , Yue, Li-Ping , Huang, Yu-Ling , Wang, Yin , Xu, Yan , Fu, Qiang-Qiang , Zheng, Zhen
- Date: 2023
- Type: Text , Journal article , Review
- Relation: Frontiers in Psychiatry Vol. 14, no. (2023), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are used to guide decision-making, especially regarding complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies that are unfamiliar to orthodox healthcare providers. This systematic review aimed to critically review and summarise CAM recommendations associated with anxiety management included in the existing CPGs. Methods: Seven databases, websites of six international guidelines developing institutions, and the National Centre for Complementary and Integrative Health website were systematically searched. Their reporting and methodological quality were evaluated using the Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in Healthcare checklist and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (2nd version) instrument, respectively. Results: Ten CPGs were included, with reporting rates between 51.4 and 88.6%. Seven of these were of moderate to high methodological quality. Seventeen CAM modalities were implicated, involving phytotherapeutics, mind–body practice, art therapy, and homeopathy. Applied relaxation was included in 70% CPGs, which varied in degree of support for its use in the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder. There were few recommendations for other therapies/products. Light therapy was not recommended for use in generalised anxiety disorder, and St John’s wort and mindfulness were not recommended for use in social anxiety disorder in individual guidelines. Recommendations for the applicability of other therapies/products for treating a specific anxiety disorder were commonly graded as “unclear, unambiguous, or uncertain”. No CAM recommendations were provided for separation anxiety disorder, specific phobia or selective mutism. Conclusion: Available guidelines are limited in providing logically explained graded CAM recommendations for anxiety treatment and care. A lack of high-quality evidence and multidisciplinary consultation during the guideline development are two major reasons. High quality and reliable clinical evidence and the engagement of a range of interdisciplinary stakeholders are needed for future CPG development and updating. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022373694, identifier CRD42022373694. Copyright © 2023 Zhao, Kennedy, Xu, Conduit, Wang, Zhang, Wang, Yue, Huang, Wang, Xu, Fu and Zheng.
- Authors: Zhao, Fei-Yi , Kennedy, Gerard , Xu, Peijie , Conduit, Russell , Wang, Yan-Mei , Zhang, Wen-Jing , Wang, Hui-Ru , Yue, Li-Ping , Huang, Yu-Ling , Wang, Yin , Xu, Yan , Fu, Qiang-Qiang , Zheng, Zhen
- Date: 2023
- Type: Text , Journal article , Review
- Relation: Frontiers in Psychiatry Vol. 14, no. (2023), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are used to guide decision-making, especially regarding complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies that are unfamiliar to orthodox healthcare providers. This systematic review aimed to critically review and summarise CAM recommendations associated with anxiety management included in the existing CPGs. Methods: Seven databases, websites of six international guidelines developing institutions, and the National Centre for Complementary and Integrative Health website were systematically searched. Their reporting and methodological quality were evaluated using the Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in Healthcare checklist and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (2nd version) instrument, respectively. Results: Ten CPGs were included, with reporting rates between 51.4 and 88.6%. Seven of these were of moderate to high methodological quality. Seventeen CAM modalities were implicated, involving phytotherapeutics, mind–body practice, art therapy, and homeopathy. Applied relaxation was included in 70% CPGs, which varied in degree of support for its use in the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder. There were few recommendations for other therapies/products. Light therapy was not recommended for use in generalised anxiety disorder, and St John’s wort and mindfulness were not recommended for use in social anxiety disorder in individual guidelines. Recommendations for the applicability of other therapies/products for treating a specific anxiety disorder were commonly graded as “unclear, unambiguous, or uncertain”. No CAM recommendations were provided for separation anxiety disorder, specific phobia or selective mutism. Conclusion: Available guidelines are limited in providing logically explained graded CAM recommendations for anxiety treatment and care. A lack of high-quality evidence and multidisciplinary consultation during the guideline development are two major reasons. High quality and reliable clinical evidence and the engagement of a range of interdisciplinary stakeholders are needed for future CPG development and updating. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022373694, identifier CRD42022373694. Copyright © 2023 Zhao, Kennedy, Xu, Conduit, Wang, Zhang, Wang, Yue, Huang, Wang, Xu, Fu and Zheng.
Managing depression with complementary and alternative medicine therapies: a scientometric analysis and visualization of research activities
- Zhao, Fei-Yi, Xu, Peijie, Zheng, Zhen, Conduit, Russell, Xu, Yan, Yue, Li-Ping, Wang, Hui-Ru, Wang, Yan-Mei, Li, Yuan-Xin, Li, Chun-Yan, Zhang, Wen-Jing, Fu, Qiang-Qiang, Kennedy, Gerard
- Authors: Zhao, Fei-Yi , Xu, Peijie , Zheng, Zhen , Conduit, Russell , Xu, Yan , Yue, Li-Ping , Wang, Hui-Ru , Wang, Yan-Mei , Li, Yuan-Xin , Li, Chun-Yan , Zhang, Wen-Jing , Fu, Qiang-Qiang , Kennedy, Gerard
- Date: 2023
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Frontiers in Psychiatry Vol. 14, no. (2023), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) interventions may prove to be an attractive option for the treatment of depression. The aim of this scientometric analysis is to determine the global scientific output of research regarding managing depression with CAM and identify the hotspots and frontiers within this theme. Methods: Publications regarding the utilization of CAM for treating depression were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection from 1993 to 2022, and analyzed and visualized by Bibliometrix R-package, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace. Results: A total of 1,710 publications were acquired. The number of annual publications showed an overall rapid upward trend, with the figure peaking at 179 in 2021. The USA was the leading research center. Totally 2,323 distinct institutions involving 7,638 scholars contributed to the research theme. However, most of the cooperation was limited to within the same country, institution or research team. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine was the most productive periodical. The CAM therapies of most interest to researchers were acupuncture and body–mind techniques, such as yoga, meditation and mindfulness. Systematic review and meta-analysis are commonly used methods. “Inflammation,” “rating scale” and “psychological stress” were identified as the most studied trend topics recently. Conclusion: Managing depression with evidence-based CAM treatment is gaining attention globally. Body–mind techniques and acupuncture are growing research hotspots or emerging trending topics. Future studies are predicted to potentially investigate the possible mechanisms of action underlying CAM treatments in reducing depression in terms of modulation of psychological stress and inflammation levels. Cross-countries/institutes/team research collaborations should be encouraged and further enhanced. Copyright © 2023 Zhao, Xu, Zheng, Conduit, Xu, Yue, Wang, Wang, Li, Li, Zhang, Fu and Kennedy.
- Authors: Zhao, Fei-Yi , Xu, Peijie , Zheng, Zhen , Conduit, Russell , Xu, Yan , Yue, Li-Ping , Wang, Hui-Ru , Wang, Yan-Mei , Li, Yuan-Xin , Li, Chun-Yan , Zhang, Wen-Jing , Fu, Qiang-Qiang , Kennedy, Gerard
- Date: 2023
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Frontiers in Psychiatry Vol. 14, no. (2023), p.
- Full Text:
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) interventions may prove to be an attractive option for the treatment of depression. The aim of this scientometric analysis is to determine the global scientific output of research regarding managing depression with CAM and identify the hotspots and frontiers within this theme. Methods: Publications regarding the utilization of CAM for treating depression were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection from 1993 to 2022, and analyzed and visualized by Bibliometrix R-package, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace. Results: A total of 1,710 publications were acquired. The number of annual publications showed an overall rapid upward trend, with the figure peaking at 179 in 2021. The USA was the leading research center. Totally 2,323 distinct institutions involving 7,638 scholars contributed to the research theme. However, most of the cooperation was limited to within the same country, institution or research team. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine was the most productive periodical. The CAM therapies of most interest to researchers were acupuncture and body–mind techniques, such as yoga, meditation and mindfulness. Systematic review and meta-analysis are commonly used methods. “Inflammation,” “rating scale” and “psychological stress” were identified as the most studied trend topics recently. Conclusion: Managing depression with evidence-based CAM treatment is gaining attention globally. Body–mind techniques and acupuncture are growing research hotspots or emerging trending topics. Future studies are predicted to potentially investigate the possible mechanisms of action underlying CAM treatments in reducing depression in terms of modulation of psychological stress and inflammation levels. Cross-countries/institutes/team research collaborations should be encouraged and further enhanced. Copyright © 2023 Zhao, Xu, Zheng, Conduit, Xu, Yue, Wang, Wang, Li, Li, Zhang, Fu and Kennedy.
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »