An evidence-based checklist for improving scoping review quality
- Authors: Cooper, Simon J. , Cant, Robyn , Kelly, Michelle , Levett-Jones, Tracy , McKenna, Lisa
- Date: 2021
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Clinical Nursing Research Vol. 30, no. 3 (2021), p. 230-240
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: A scoping review aims to systematically explore and map the research available from a wide range of sources. The objective of this study was to produce a scoping review checklist to guide future scoping studies to enable rigorous review and critique of phenomena of interest. The methods used included a review of literature, expert consensus group meetings, a modified Delphi survey and, finally, verification against recent scoping study examples. Results showed that the checklist was able to identify key elements of scoping reviews. The 22-item Scoping Review Checklist (SRC), which includes two optional stakeholder consultation items, has been developed using rigorous recommended approaches. The checklist can be used to guide the conduct and critique of scoping studies. **Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 5 including Federation University Australia affiliate “Simon Cooper and Robyn Cant” is provided in this record**
Nursing degree students’ clinical placement experiences in Australia: A survey design
- Authors: Luders, Elise , Cooper, Simon J. , Cant, Robyn , Waters, Donna , Tower, Marion
- Date: 2021
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Nurse Education in Practice Vol. 54, no. (2021), p.
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Aim: This study aimed to evaluate Australian nursing students’ views of placements at seven tertiary education institutions with the use of the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET). Background: Clinical placements are a core element of healthcare education programs around the world (Chuan and Barnett, 2012) with undergraduate nursing students required to complete a prescribed number of hours as part of their degree. The quality of nursing clinical placements varies with a range of positive and negative learning experiences. Design: A survey design was used with a contemporary survey tool– the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET). Using Qualtrics software (Qualtrics, 2005) the on-line survey was distributed to approximately 6265 undergraduate nursing students at six Australian universities and one Technical and Further Education (TAFE) college where Bachelor of Nursing degree students were enrolled. Three Australian States were covered. Sites were selected where a project team member was employed. Methods: A total of 1263 nursing students completed the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET) − 19 items (rated 1–5), one global rating (rated 1–10) − following placement in three Australian States (July 2019−February 2020). Most - 618 (48.9%) completed a placement in acute care with placements positively rated overall. Results: The total PET mean score was 78.3% with 29.8% being ‘extremely satisfied’ (10 out of 10 – Item 20). However, 11.0% were dissatisfied with global ratings of four or less, whilst ratings between States differed significantly (p = <0.001). One third of respondents answered a free text statement relating to placement experiences, with significantly more comments from older students (p = <0.001) and from those with ratings in the lower range (p = <0.001). Three core themes emerged: 1. Staff Attitudes to Students, 2. Environment and 3. Lifestyle. Conclusions: Whilst students’ clinical experiences in Australia tend to be positive a minority reported exposure to negative staff attitudes, in unsafe environments, with lifestyle detriments. Further work is required to understand and enhance student experiences. © 2021. **Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 5 including Federation University Australia affiliate “Elise Luders, Simon Cooper, Robyn Cant" is provided in this record**
The impact of web-based and face-to-face simulation education programs on nurses' response to patient deterioration : a multi-site interrupted time series study
- Authors: Kinsman, Leigh , Cooper, Simon J. , Cant, Robyn , Kim, Jeong-Ah , Chung, Catherine
- Date: 2021
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Nurse Education Today Vol. 102, no. (2021), p.
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: Nurses' response to patient deterioration in acute hospital wards is a priority issue. Simulation education programs improve nurses' knowledge and confidence, but the translation into better care is largely unknown for both web based (WB) and face to face (F2F) simulation programs. Aim: To measure the impact of simulation education on nurses' response to patient deterioration in acute medical ward settings, and to compare the impact of WB and F2F versions. Design: An interrupted time series, non-randomised trial across four medical wards in Victoria, Australia. Wards were allocated to either web-based or face-to-face versions of the same simulation program, FIRST2ACT. Interrupted time series measurement for six fortnights both before and after the intervention were used to measure and compare responses to deterioration. Responses to patient deterioration were extracted from medical records and grouped into outcomes for escalation (e.g. initiation of clinical review), assessment and observation (e.g. increased recording of vital signs, conscious state and pain scores) and clinical interventions (e.g. oxygen administration). Results: 126 nurses (89%) participated across the four wards. 946 patient records (506 in the F2F; 440 in the WB group) were included in analyses. There were significant and sustained improvements between pre and post samples in outcomes for escalation (13.0% to 28.8%; p = 0.000) and assessment and observation (conscious state recorded increased from 91.1% to 100%; p = 0.000, and pain score recorded increased from 97.8% to 99.8%; p = 0.000). There were no differences between the web-based and face-to-face groups except in appropriate oxygen application which increased by 7.7% in the F2F group and decreased by 11.8% in the WB group (p = 0.046). Conclusions: There was a significant improvement in nurses' response to patient deterioration following both versions of simulation, indicating that both have a role to play in supporting nurses' response to patient deterioration. © 2021. *Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 5 including Federation University Australia affiliate “Simon Cooper, Robyn Cant, Jeong-Ah Kim, Catherine Chung” is provided in this record**
- Description: Background: Nurses' response to patient deterioration in acute hospital wards is a priority issue. Simulation education programs improve nurses' knowledge and confidence, but the translation into better care is largely unknown for both web based (WB) and face to face (F2F) simulation programs. Aim: To measure the impact of simulation education on nurses' response to patient deterioration in acute medical ward settings, and to compare the impact of WB and F2F versions. Design: An interrupted time series, non-randomised trial across four medical wards in Victoria, Australia. Wards were allocated to either web-based or face-to-face versions of the same simulation program, FIRST2ACT. Interrupted time series measurement for six fortnights both before and after the intervention were used to measure and compare responses to deterioration. Responses to patient deterioration were extracted from medical records and grouped into outcomes for escalation (e.g. initiation of clinical review), assessment and observation (e.g. increased recording of vital signs, conscious state and pain scores) and clinical interventions (e.g. oxygen administration). Results: 126 nurses (89%) participated across the four wards. 946 patient records (506 in the F2F; 440 in the WB group) were included in analyses. There were significant and sustained improvements between pre and post samples in outcomes for escalation (13.0% to 28.8%; p = 0.000) and assessment and observation (conscious state recorded increased from 91.1% to 100%; p = 0.000, and pain score recorded increased from 97.8% to 99.8%; p = 0.000). There were no differences between the web-based and face-to-face groups except in appropriate oxygen application which increased by 7.7% in the F2F group and decreased by 11.8% in the WB group (p = 0.046). Conclusions: There was a significant improvement in nurses' response to patient deterioration following both versions of simulation, indicating that both have a role to play in supporting nurses' response to patient deterioration. © 2021. *Please note that there are multiple authors for this article therefore only the name of the first 5 including Federation University Australia affiliate “Simon Cooper” is provided in this record**
Hospital nurses? Simulation-based education regarding patient safety : a scoping review
- Authors: Cant, Robyn , Cooper, Simon J. , Lam, Louisa
- Date: 2020
- Type: Text , Journal article , Review
- Relation: Clinical Simulation in Nursing Vol. 44, no. (Jul 2020), p. 19-34
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
The impact of emerging simulation-based technologies on the management of deteriorating patients : aiming for a gold standard educational evaluation
- Authors: Cooper, Simon J. , Cant, Robyn , Chung, Catherine , First Act Impact Team
- Date: 2020
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Clinical Simulation in Nursing Vol. 45, no. (2020), p. 50-59
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: Measuring the impact of patient safety interventions is challenging. This article aims to illustrate a “gold standard” model of program evaluation incorporating examples from two patient deterioration programs. Methods: Australian nurses were trained in primary responses to emergencies in four hospitals using either face-to-face (F2F) or screen-based simulation versions of a simulation program. Evaluation outcomes were measured using Kirkpatrick's evaluation hierarchy covering participant ‘reaction’, ‘learning’, ‘behaviour’ change and ‘results’—based on 1,564 pre–post intervention vital signs chart reviews. Results: Seventy-four nurses participated. Reaction—participant confidence/competence ratings and Learning improved significantly in both modalities (p <.001). Behaviour—oxygen delivery systems were used more appropriately after training in the F2F group (p =.037). Applicable recording of oxygen saturation (SpO2) improved significantly (p ≤.008) in both modalities. Results—at least a two-fold increase in the overall initiation of a clinical review after training, in both modalities (p <.001; effect: d = 0.41 F2F and d = 0.35 screen-based simulation). Conclusions: Kirkpatrick's evaluation model enables a suitable template for gold standard education evaluations. © 2020 International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning
- Description: Funding details: State Government of Victoria, 31362
The nominal group technique : generating consensus in nursing research
- Authors: Cooper, Simon J. , Cant, Robyn , Luders, Elise , Waters, Donna , Henderson, Amanda , Hood, Kerry , Reid-Searl, Kerry , Ryan, Colleen , Tower, Marion , Willetts, Georgina
- Date: 2020
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Journal of Nursing Education Vol. 59, no. 2 (Feb 2020), p. 65-+
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: The purpose of this article is to describe the Nominal Group Technique and its application as a consensus-generating approach in nursing research. The approach incorporates face-to-face meetings to explore opinions, generate ideas, and determine priorities. The nominal group technique process, which is based on a study designed to develop a nursing student clinical placement (clinical practicum) evaluation tool, is described. Advantages of the approach include creative face-to-face discussions with minimal resource demands. The nominal group technique is beneficial and can be used to achieve consensus in nursing research, but a lack of anonymity may preclude the process in some investigations.
Bibliometric Scan of the 100 Most Cited Nursing Simulation Articles
- Authors: Cant, Robyn , Cooper, Simon J.
- Date: 2019
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Clinical Simulation in Nursing Vol. 36, no. (2019), p. 1-7
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: Bibliometrics involves statistical analyses of publication data, particularly citation analysis, to determine popularity/impact of articles and authors. Methods: Citation analysis was conducted on the "top 100'' cited nursing simulation articles in the Scopus database in April 2019. Results: The median number of article citations was 84 (mean = 100.4; range, 53-557). Citations were steadily accumulated after publication; the majority between year four and year seven. Two-thirds of the articles were led by authors from the United States. Conclusions: This report on bibliometric mapping helps to graphically illustrate the evolution of simulation articles in the field of nursing.
Clinical placements in contemporary nursing education: Where is the evidence?
- Authors: McKenna, Lisa , Cant, Robyn , Bogossian, Fiona , Cooper, Simon J. , Levett-Jones, Tracy , Seaton, Philippa
- Date: 2019
- Type: Text , Journal article , Editorial
- Relation: Nurse Education Today Vol. 83, no. (2019), p.
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Clinical practice is fundamental to the learning of undergraduate and entry-level nursing students. It provides the milieu whereby students apply classroom theory and simulated practice to the real world of nursing and become socialised into the profession. In contemporary nursing education, there is often competition among tertiary education providers to locate quality, appropriate placements; substantial costs may be incurred to access suitable placements.
What's in a name? Clarifying the nomenclature of virtual simulation
- Authors: Cant, Robyn , Cooper, Simon J. , Sussex, Roland , Bogossian, Fiona
- Date: 2019
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Clinical Simulation in Nursing Vol. 27, no. (2019), p. 26-30
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Clinical simulation is an essential component of health professional education. Digital technologies can provide students with near-reality, interactive virtual simulation learning experiences on static and mobile appliances. Clarification is needed, however, regarding the various types of virtual simulation and the different program components. We drew on published literature to define virtual simulation modalities and to offer definitive terminology to clarify the nomenclature and composition of virtual simulation. Reporting should include description of ‘Fidelity’ ‘Immersion’ and ‘Patient’ to add clarity and utility to research in the field.
Rating teams’ non-technical skills in the emergency department : A qualitative study of nurses’ experience
- Authors: Porter, Joanne , Cant, Robyn , Cooper, Simon J.
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: International Emergency Nursing Vol. 38, no. (2018), p. 15-20
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Introduction: Non-technical skills (NTS) teamwork training can enhance clinicians’ understanding of roles and improve communication. We evaluated a quality improvement project rating teams’ NTS performance to determine the value of formal rating and debriefing processes. Methods: In two Australian emergency departments the NTS of resuscitation teams were rated by senior nurses and medical staff. Key measures were leadership, teamwork, and task management using a valid instrument: Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM™). Emergency nurses were asked to attend a focus group from which key themes around the quality improvement process were identified. Results: Main themes were: ‘Team composition’ (allocation of resuscitation team roles), ‘Resuscitation leadership’ (including both nursing and medical leadership roles) and ‘TEAM™ ratings promote reflective practice’ (providing staff a platform to discuss team effectiveness). Objective ratings were seen as enabling staff to provide feedback to other team members. Reflection on practice and debriefing were thought to improve communication, help define roles and responsibilities, and clarify leadership roles. Conclusion: Use of a non-technical skills rating scheme such as TEAM™ after team-based clinical resuscitation events was seen by emergency department nurses as feasible and a useful process for examining and improving multi-disciplinary practice, while improving team performance. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
The educational impact of web-based and face-to-face patient deterioration simulation programs : An interventional trial
- Authors: Chung, Catherine , Cooper, Simon J. , Cant, Robyn , Connell, Cliff , McKay, Angela , Kinsman, Leigh , Gazula, Swapnali , Boyle, Jayne , Cameron, Amanda , Cash, Penelope , Evans, Lisa , Kim, Jeong-Ah , Masud, Rana , McInnes, Denise , Norman, Lisa , Penz, Erika , Rotter, Thomas , Tanti, Erin , Breakspear, Tom
- Date: 2018
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Nurse Education Today Vol. 64, no. (2018), p. 93-98
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: There are international concerns relating to the management of patient deterioration. The “failure to rescue” literature identifies that nursing staff miss cues of deterioration and often fail to call for assistance. Simulation-based educational approaches may improve nurses’ recognition and management of patient deterioration. Objectives: To investigate the educational impact of the First2Act web-based (WB) and face-to-face (F2F) simulation programs. Design & Setting: A mixed methods interventional cohort trial with nursing staff from four Australian hospitals. Participants: Nursing staff working in four public and private hospital medical wards in the State of Victoria. Methods: In 2016, ward nursing staff (n = 74) from a public and private hospital completed three F2F laboratory-based team simulations with a patient actor in teams of three. 56 nursing staff from another public and private hospital individually completed a three-scenario WB simulation program (First2ActWeb) [A 91% participation rate]. Validated tools were used to measure knowledge (multi-choice questionnaire), competence (check-list of actions) and confidence (self-rated) before and after the intervention. Results: Both WB and F2F participants’ knowledge, competence and confidence increased significantly after training (p ≤0.001). Skill performance for the WB group increased significantly from 61% to 74% (p ≤ 0.05) and correlated significantly with post-test knowledge (p = 0.014). No change was seen in the F2F groups’ performance scores. Course evaluations were positive with median ratings of 4/5 (WB) and 5/5 (F2F). The F2F program received significantly more positive evaluations than the WB program (p < 0.05), particularly with regard to quality of feedback. Conclusion: WB and F2F simulation are effective education strategies with both programs demonstrating positive learning outcomes. WB programs increase ease of access to training whilst F2F enable the development of tactile hands on skills and teamwork. A combined blended learning education strategy is recommended to enhance competence and patient safety. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
Deteriorating patients : Global reach and impact of an e-simulation program
- Authors: Cooper, Simon J. , Hopmans, Ruben , Cant, Robyn , Bogossian, Fiona , Giannis, Anita , King, Rosemary
- Date: 2017
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Clinical Simulation in Nursing Vol. 13, no. 11 (2017), p. 562-572
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background E-simulation may enable a feasible education solution to the management of deteriorating patients. Method The study involves a pre–post quasi-experimental evaluation of global data on educational outcomes from an e-simulation program. Results Qualified nurses (n = 1,229) and final year nursing students (n = 1,742) were among 5,511 participants from 20 countries who completed the program. Both groups’ knowledge and performance improved significantly (p = <.001) with no difference between groups. Regression analysis revealed predictors of performance were education level, knowledge, experience, and being female. Participants positively evaluated the program and mode of delivery. Conclusion E-simulation may enhance students’ preparation for practice and improve qualified nurses’ management of deteriorating patients. © 2017 International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning
The impact of walk-in centres and GP co-operatives on emergency department presentations : A systematic review of the literature
- Authors: Crawford, Jessica , Cooper, Simon J. , Cant, Robyn , DeSouza, Ruth
- Date: 2017
- Type: Text , Journal article , Review
- Relation: International Emergency Nursing Vol. 34, no. (2017), p. 36-42
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background Internationally, non-urgent presentations are increasing the pressure on Emergency Department (ED) staff and resources. This systematic review aims to identify the impact of alternative emergency care pathways on ED presentations – specifically GP cooperatives and walk-in clinics. Methods Based on a structured PICO enquiry with either walk-in clinic or GP cooperative as the intervention, a search was made for peer-reviewed publications in English, between 2000 and 2014. Medline plus, OVID, PubMed, and Google Scholar were searched. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) guidelines were used to assess study quality and data was extracted using an adapted JBI Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (QARI). Subsequent reporting followed the PRISMA guideline. Results Eleven high quality quantitative studies met the inclusion criteria. Walk-in clinics do have the potential to reduce non-urgent emergency department presentations, however evidence of this effect is low. GP cooperatives offer an alternative care stream for patients presenting to the ED and do significantly reduce local ED attendances. Community members need to be made aware of these options in order to make informed treatment choices. Conclusion GP cooperatives in particular do have the potential to reduce ED workload. Further research is required to uncover recent trends and patient outcomes for walk-in clinics and GP cooperatives. © 2017 Elsevier Ltd
Use of simulation-based learning in undergraduate nurse education : An umbrella systematic review
- Authors: Cant, Robyn , Cooper, Simon J.
- Date: 2017
- Type: Text , Journal article , Review
- Relation: Nurse Education Today Vol. 49, no. (2017), p. 63-71
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Objective To conduct a systematic review to appraise and review evidence on the impact of simulation-based education for undergraduate/pre-licensure nursing students, using existing reviews of literature. Design An umbrella review (review of reviews). Data Sources Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHLPlus), PubMed, and Google Scholar. Study Selection Reviews of literature conducted between 2010 and 2015 regarding simulation-based education for pre-licensure nursing students. Data Extraction The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for conduct of an umbrella review was used to inform the review process. Results of Data Synthesis Twenty-five systematic reviews of literature were included, of which 14 were recent (2013–2015). Most described the level of evidence of component studies as a mix of experimental and quasi-experimental designs. The reviews measured around 14 different main outcome variables, thus limiting the number of primary studies that each individual review could pool to appraise. Many reviews agreed on the key learning outcome of knowledge acquisition, although no overall quantitative effect was derived. Three of four high-quality reviews found that simulation supported psychomotor development; a fourth found too few high quality studies to make a statistical comparison. Simulation statistically improved self-efficacy in pretest-posttest studies, and in experimental designs self-efficacy was superior to that of other teaching methods; lower level research designs limiting further comparison. The reviews commonly reported strong student satisfaction with simulation education and some reported improved confidence and/or critical thinking. Conclusion This umbrella review took a global view of 25 reviews of simulation research in nursing education, comprising over 700 primary studies. To discern overall outcomes across reviews, statistical comparison of quantitative results (effect size) must be the key comparator. Simulation-based education contributes to students’ learning in a number of ways when integrated into pre-licensure nursing curricula. Overall, use of a constellation of instruments and a lack of high quality study designs mean that there are still some gaps in evidence of effects that need to be addressed. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd
Improving the non-technical skills of hospital medical emergency teams : The Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM™)
- Authors: Cant, Robyn , Porter, Joanne , Cooper, Simon J. , Roberts, Kate , Wilson, Ian , Gartside, Christopher
- Date: 2016
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: EMA - Emergency Medicine Australasia Vol. 28, no. 6 (2016), p. 641-646
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Objectives: This prospective descriptive study aimed to test the validity and feasibility of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM™) for assessing real-world medical emergency teams' non-technical skills. Second, the present study aimed to explore the instrument's contribution to practice regarding teamwork and learning outcomes. Methods: Registered nurses (RNs) and medical staff (n = 104) in two hospital EDs in rural Victoria, Australia, participated. Over a 10 month period, the (TEAM™) instrument was completed by multiple clinicians at medical emergency episodes. Results: In 80 real-world medical emergency team resuscitation episodes (283 clinician assessments), non-technical skills ratings averaged 89% per episode (39 of a possible 44 points). Twenty-one episodes were rated in the lowest quartile (i.e. ≤37 points out of 44). Ratings differed by discipline, with significantly higher scores given by medical raters (mean: 41.1 ± 4.4) than RNs (38.7 ± 5.4) (P = 0.001). This difference occurred in the Leadership domain. The tool was reliable with Cronbach's alpha 0.78, high uni-dimensional validity and mean inter-item correlation of 0.45. Concurrent validity was confirmed by strong correlation between TEAM™ score and the awarded Global Rating (P < 0.001), with 38.4% of shared variance. RNs praised the instrument as it initiated staff reflection and debriefing discussions around performance improvement. Conclusion: Non-technical skills of medical emergency teams are known to often be suboptimal; however, average ratings of 89% were achieved in this real-world study. TEAM™ is a valid, reliable and easy to use tool, for both training and clinical settings, with benefits for team performance when used as an assessment and/or debriefing tool. © 2016 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine
Measuring teamwork performance: Validity testing of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) with clinical resuscitation teams
- Authors: Cooper, Simon J. , Cant, Robyn , Connell, Cliff , Sims, Lyndall , Porter, Joanne , Symmons, Mark , Nestel, Debra , Liaw, Sok Ying
- Date: 2016
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Resuscitation Vol. 101, no. (2016), p. 97-101
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: AimTo test the resuscitation non-technical Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) for feasibility, validity and reliability, in two Australian Emergency Departments (ED). BackgroundNon-technical (teamwork) skills have been identified as inadequate and as such have a significant impact on patient safety. Valid and reliable teamwork assessment tools are an important element of performance assessment and debriefing processes. MethodsA quasi experimental design based on observational ratings of resuscitation non-technical skills in two metropolitan ED. Senior nursing staff rated 106 adult resuscitation team events over a ten month period where three or more resuscitation team members attended. Resuscitation events, team performance and validity and reliability data was collected for the TEAM. ResultsMost rated events were for full cardiac resuscitation (43%) with 3–15 team members present for an average of 45min. The TEAM was found to be feasible and quickly completed with minimal or no training. Discriminant validity was good as was internal consistency with a Cronbach alpha of 0.94. Uni-dimensional and concurrent validity also reached acceptable standards, 0.94 and >0.63 (p=<0.001), respectively, and a single ‘teamwork’ construct was identified. Non-technical skills overall were good but leadership was rated notably lower than task and teamwork performance indicating a need for leadership training. ConclusionThe TEAM is a feasible, valid and reliable non-technical assessment measure in simulated and real clinical settings. Emergency teams need to develop leadership skills through training and reflective debriefing.
A trial of e-simulation of sudden patient deterioration (FIRST2ACT WEB
- Authors: Bogossian, Fiona , Cooper, Simon J. , Cant, Robyn , Porter, Joanne , Forbes, Helen , McKenna, Lisa , Kinsman, Leigh , Endacott, Ruth , Devries, Brett , Philips, Nicole , Bucknall, Tracey , Young, Susan , Kain, Victoria
- Date: 2015
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Nurse Education Today Vol. 35, no. 10 (2015), p. e36-e42
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background: High-fidelity simulation pedagogy is of increasing importance in health professional education; however, face-to-face simulation programs are resource intensive and impractical to implement across large numbers of students. Objectives: To investigate undergraduate nursing students' theoretical and applied learning in response to the e-simulation program-FIRST2ACT WEBTM, and explore predictors of virtual clinical performance. Design and setting: Multi-center trial of FIRST2ACT WEBTM accessible to students in five Australian universities and colleges, across 8 campuses. Participants: A population of 489 final-year nursing students in programs of study leading to license to practice. Methods: Participants proceeded through three phases: (i) pre-simulation-briefing and assessment of clinical knowledge and experience; (ii) e-simulation-three interactive e-simulation clinical scenarios which included video recordings of patients with deteriorating conditions, interactive clinical tasks, pop up responses to tasks, and timed performance; and (iii) post-simulation feedback and evaluation.Descriptive statistics were followed by bivariate analysis to detect any associations, which were further tested using standard regression analysis. Results: Of 409 students who commenced the program (83% response rate), 367 undergraduate nursing students completed the web-based program in its entirety, yielding a completion rate of 89.7%; 38.1% of students achieved passing clinical performance across three scenarios, and the proportion achieving passing clinical knowledge increased from 78.15% pre-simulation to 91.6% post-simulation.Knowledge was the main independent predictor of clinical performance in responding to a virtual deteriorating patient R2=0.090, F(7, 352)=4.962, p<0.001. Discussion: The use of web-based technology allows simulation activities to be accessible to a large number of participants and completion rates indicate that 'Net Generation' nursing students were highly engaged with this mode of learning. Conclusion: The web-based e-simulation program FIRST2ACTTM effectively enhanced knowledge, virtual clinical performance, and self-assessed knowledge, skills, confidence, and competence in final-year nursing students. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd.
Doing the right thing at the right time: Assessing responses to patient deterioration in electronic simulation scenarios using course-of-action analysis.
- Authors: Cooper, Simon J. , Cant, Robyn , Bogossian, Fiona , Bucknall, Tracey , Hopmans, Ruben
- Date: 2015
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing Vol. 33, no. 5 (2015), p. 199-207
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: International studies indicate that the recognition and management of deteriorating patients in hospitals are poor and that patient assessment is often inadequate. Face-to-face simulation programs have been shown to have an impact on educational and clinical outcomes; however, little is known about performance in contemporary healthcare e-simulation approaches. Using data from an open-access Web-based patient deterioration program (FIRSTACTWeb), the performance of 367 Australian nursing students in identification of treatment priorities and clinical actions was analyzed using a military model of Course of Action Simulation Analysis. Participants' performance in the whole program demonstrated a significant improvement in knowledge and skills (P ≤ .001) with high levels of participant satisfaction. Course of Action Simulation Analysis modeling identified three key participant groupings within which only 18% took the "best course of action" (the right actions and timing), with most (70%) completing the right actions but in the wrong order. The remaining 12% produced incomplete assessments and actions in an incorrect sequence. Contemporary approaches such as e-simulation do enhance educational outcomes. Measurement of performance when combined with Course of Action Simulation Analysis becomes a useful tool in the description of outcomes, an understanding of decision making, and the prediction of future events.
E-simulation:pre-registration nursing students' evaluation of an on-line patient deterioration program
- Authors: Cant, Robyn , Young, Susan , Cooper, Simon J. , Porter, Joanne
- Date: 2015
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing Vol. 33, no. 3 (2015), p. 108-114
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: This study explores preregistration nursing students’ views of a Web-based simulation program: FIRST2 ACTWeb (Feedback Incorporating Review and Simulation Techniques to Act on Clinical Trends-Web). The multimedia program incorporating three videoed scenarios portrayed by a standardized patient (human actor) aims to improve students’ recognition and management of hospital patient deterioration. Participants were 367 final-year nursing students from three universities who completed an online evaluation survey and 19 students from two universities who attended one of five focus groups. Two researchers conducted a thematic analysis of the transcribed narratives. Three core themes identified were as follows: “ease of program use,” “experience of e-Simulation,” and “satisfaction with the learning experience.” The Web-based clinical learning environment was endorsed as functional, feasible, and easy to use and was reported to have high fidelity and realism. Feedback in both focus groups and surveys showed high satisfaction with the learning experience. Overall, evaluation suggested that the Web-based simulation program successfully integrated elements essential for blended learning. Although Web-based educational applications are resource intensive to develop, positive appraisal of program quality, plus program accessibility and repeatability, appears to provide important educational benefits. Further research is needed to determine the transferability of these learning experiences into real-world practice.
Patient deterioration education: Evaluation of face-to-face simulation and e-simulation approaches
- Authors: Cooper, Simon J. , Cant, Robyn , Bogossian, Fiona , Kinsman, Leigh , Bucknall, Tracey
- Date: 2015
- Type: Text , Journal article
- Relation: Clinical Simulation in Nursing Vol. 11, no. 2 (2015), p. 97-105
- Full Text: false
- Reviewed:
- Description: Background Simulation-based education is one strategy that may be used to teach nursing students to recognize and manage patient deterioration. Method Final-year preregistration nursing students (n = 97) completed three face-to-face laboratory-based team simulations with a simulated patient (actor) and 330 students individually completed a three-scenario Web-based simulation program: FIRST2ACTWeb™. Results Both groups achieved moderate performance scores (means: face to face, 49%; e-simulation, 69%). Course evaluations were positive, skill gain showing a greater effect size in the face-to-face program than for e-simulation, and higher satisfaction and more positive appraisal. Conclusion Face-to-face simulation and e-simulation are effective educational strategies with e-simulation offering greater feasibility. Either strategy is likely to add value to the learning experience.