- Title
- Evaluation of the bifactor structure of the dispositional hope scale
- Creator
- Gomez, Rapson; McLaren, Suzanne; Sharp, Mersey; Smith, Cara; Hearn, Kate; Turner, Leah
- Date
- 2015
- Type
- Text; Journal article
- Identifier
- http://researchonline.federation.edu.au/vital/access/HandleResolver/1959.17/77079
- Identifier
- vital:7674
- Identifier
-
https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2014.938158
- Identifier
- ISSN:0022-3891
- Abstract
- The Dispositional Hope Scale (DHS; Snyder et al., 1991) is composed of items assessing an individual's perception of his or her agency and pathways. This study examined support for the bifactor structure and relation of the factors in this model with depressive symptoms. It also examined cross-gender measurement invariance for the bifactor model. A community sample of 413 women and 257 men completed the DHS. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated more support for the bifactor model than the 1- and 2-factor models. Results also indicated full measurement invariance across gender for the bifactor and the 2-factor models. The general and the specific agency factors, but not the specific pathways factor, correlated with depressive symptoms. The better support for the bifactor model suggests that ideally hope has to be measured and examined by factors reflecting high covariance for agency and pathways, and also factors reflecting unique variances for agency and pathways. The support for full cross-gender measurement invariance indicated that there are no differences in measurement and scaling properties for the DHS across ratings provided by women and men, and therefore the DHS ratings can be scored in the same way for women and men.
- Relation
- Journal of Personality Assessment Vol. 97, no. 2 (2015), p. 191-9
- Rights
- Copyright Taylor & Francis
- Rights
- This metadata is freely available under a CCO license
- Reviewed
- Hits: 1998
- Visitors: 1795
- Downloads: 0
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format |
|---|